We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Is this a correct definition for VUSA vs VUAG?

isayhello
Posts: 455 Forumite


I have some VUSA shares with IWEB and I notice that the dividends get paid and then IWEB purchase some more shares but I have some stocks where dividends aren't paid but I do see their value increasing e.g. VVLSRU.
I found out that there is an accumulating version of VUSA which is VUAG and wondered if by purchasing this instead would I make the same gains as VUSA as well as saving on any charges from IWEB for purchasing new shares with the dividends, the same as VVLSRU, or are there always charges to pay with purchasing new shares?
The other question I had around the definition of accumulating etf's was whether new shares are purchased or not, I thought they were but came across this post and wondered how does the NAV increase if new shares aren't bought, what happens to the dividends?
"Reinvesting dividends is not quite the same as being invested in an accumulating fund, you will end up with more shares if you reinvest, whereas in an accumulating fund the NAV for each share increases, but not the number of shares you hold"
I found out that there is an accumulating version of VUSA which is VUAG and wondered if by purchasing this instead would I make the same gains as VUSA as well as saving on any charges from IWEB for purchasing new shares with the dividends, the same as VVLSRU, or are there always charges to pay with purchasing new shares?
The other question I had around the definition of accumulating etf's was whether new shares are purchased or not, I thought they were but came across this post and wondered how does the NAV increase if new shares aren't bought, what happens to the dividends?
"Reinvesting dividends is not quite the same as being invested in an accumulating fund, you will end up with more shares if you reinvest, whereas in an accumulating fund the NAV for each share increases, but not the number of shares you hold"
0
Comments
-
You would normally expect that the ETF can get a better forex rate and reinvest more efficiently than a single investor, so it usually makes sense to use an accumulating fund if you don't need the income. The cost of switching (bid-offer spread and trading fees) may make it not worth switching from one to the other. It is also worth comparing assets under management and liquidity, since newly launched ACC ETFs are sometimes more difficult to trade close to the mid-price.Acc ETFs (physically replicating ones) will be reinvesting income behind the scenes, but this won't involve issuing new ETF shares. Existing shares will instead increase in price.1
-
masonic said:Acc ETFs (physically replicating ones) will be reinvesting income behind the scenes, but this won't involve issuing new ETF shares. Existing shares will instead increase in price.0
-
masonic said:You would normally expect that the ETF can get a better forex rate and reinvest more efficiently than a single investor, so it usually makes sense to use an accumulating fund if you don't need the income. The cost of switching (bid-offer spread and trading fees) may make it not worth switching from one to the other. It is also worth comparing assets under management and liquidity, since newly launched ACC ETFs are sometimes more difficult to trade close to the mid-price.0
-
isayhello said:masonic said:Acc ETFs (physically replicating ones) will be reinvesting income behind the scenes, but this won't involve issuing new ETF shares. Existing shares will instead increase in price.The price of the shares depends on the NAV of the assets held within the ETF. That includes income that isn't distributed, but instead reinvested within the ETF.When income is paid out it reduces NAV, which is why the share price drops when a distributing ETF goes ex-dividend. Which is why more shares are needed when that dividend is subsequently reinvested.isayhello said:masonic said:You would normally expect that the ETF can get a better forex rate and reinvest more efficiently than a single investor, so it usually makes sense to use an accumulating fund if you don't need the income. The cost of switching (bid-offer spread and trading fees) may make it not worth switching from one to the other. It is also worth comparing assets under management and liquidity, since newly launched ACC ETFs are sometimes more difficult to trade close to the mid-price.
0 -
IWeb:
Dividend reinvestment purchases are charged at 2% of the dividend value, and capped at a maximum of £5 per stock.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.2K Spending & Discounts
- 243.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.6K Life & Family
- 256.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards