We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Considering moving from Barclays to Starling for current account
Comments
-
Forget your credit rating, it's a made up number.CrickJon said:Well, my application has been rejected by Starling. No idea why, no explanation. I've never had that before, my credit rating is 999.
Do they get any kind of visibility on accounts I have opened at other banks recently to take advantage of switching?
Would Monzo come to the same conclusion, or is it worth trying?
Yes they will have sight of your other bank account openings (together with any other financial transactions involving credit (eg mobile phone contracts) - they are a standard part of a credit report.0 -
No. Never been with them before and was looking to make them my main day to day account. Not sure whether to try Monzo or not.Nasqueron said:
Have you had one before and closed it recently?CrickJon said:Well, my application has been rejected by Starling. No idea why, no explanation. I've never had that before, my credit rating is 999.
Do they get any kind of visibility on accounts I have opened at other banks recently to take advantage of switching?
Would Monzo come to the same conclusion, or is it worth trying?
Credit rating is never seen by lender, the fake 999 score is for entertainment services only
A credit search may show other accounts yes, they may just not want you as a customer. Monzo is a different brand and will have their own criteria0 -
Glad to hear your wife managed to get her account open with no problems. Regarding your own account, sometimes it happens that they just reject you for a small reason. I recently did switch bonus offers with both Natwest and Ulster (which use the same system) and both rejected me because the 3rd party verification system they use said that my selfie was fine but the banks themselves said they apparently weren't (furthermore, RBS allowed me an account straight away, and the three of them are the same banking group!). If you contact Startling and politely ask why you were rejected then it might be something simple that is an easy fix. As I said before, their customer service is really good so they should be able to help you out, it seems to me that you're keen to be with Startling rather than any other bank, so it's worth a call or an email in my opinion!CrickJon said:Well, my application has been rejected by Starling. No idea why, no explanation. I've never had that before, my credit rating is 999.
Do they get any kind of visibility on accounts I have opened at other banks recently to take advantage of switching?
Would Monzo come to the same conclusion, or is it worth trying?1 -
I've asked the question to Starling.
In the end, I looked at Monzo and both myself and the wife opened personal accounts and then a joint one this afternoon. Took all of ten minutes. We have a CASS initiated for a switch from Barclays now in progress for our current account (we have other accounts with Barclays too so not burning our bridges).
Starling's loss!0 -
Again, I don't have Starling, Monzo or Revolut. But I note that Which recommends Starling because the other two, though they have some advantages, do not provide enough consumer protection0
-
Monzo is only not recommended because they haven't officially signed up for the Authorised Push Payment (APP) Scam Code, they still have FSCS protection. I guess it depends whether you are likely to fall for those sorts of scams or not. Revolut is a bit different because they don't have the same protectionsdanco said:Again, I don't have Starling, Monzo or Revolut. But I note that Which recommends Starling because the other two, though they have some advantages, do not provide enough consumer protectionSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
Yes, I agree with you. But I thought this needed to be pointed out.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.6K Spending & Discounts
- 245.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

