GBP Management DCB LEGAL court claim 2025

poshMosh

Coupon-mad said:

If there was no NTK reply thusly:


ZZPS,

Stop misleading me about my right to appeal and legal liability.

Due to PoFA 2012 if driver details are not provided within 28 days of the initial correspondence the keeper can be held liable. ONLY if the parking operator has served a compliant NTK by day 56.

You and your client are also in clear breach of the BPA CoP paragraph 24.4.  No NTK. No reminder or liability notices. I believe ZZPS did the back office work in this case so this is your own fault.

You dropped the ball on the required notices.  Threatograms don't cut it.  Jog on.  You lot couldn't progress a p**s up in a brewery.

Yours faithfully

I definitely haven't received the NTK via post. I'll respond with as suggested:
---------------------
Dear Sir/Madam,

Due to PoFA 2012,  if driver details are not provided within 28 days of the initial correspondence the keeper can be held liable only if the parking operator has served a compliant NTK by day 56, which in this case has not been served.

You and your client are also in clear breach of the BPA CoP paragraph 24.4. - no reminder or liability notices. 

Yours Faithfully,
--------------------------

Finally, I've had the QDR Solutions email asking me to complete the "security questions". Oddly, nothing about the context or reasons why I'm getting the email other than "important documents are waiting for you". I plan to ignore this.

Grizebeck

Oh its just their standard drivel 

Coupon-mad

poshMosh said:

Coupon-mad said:

If there was no NTK reply thusly:


ZZPS,

Stop misleading me about my right to appeal and legal liability.

Due to PoFA 2012 if driver details are not provided within 28 days of the initial correspondence the keeper can be held liable. ONLY if the parking operator has served a compliant NTK by day 56.

You and your client are also in clear breach of the BPA CoP paragraph 24.4.  No NTK. No reminder or liability notices. I believe ZZPS did the back office work in this case so this is your own fault.

You dropped the ball on the required notices.  Threatograms don't cut it.  Jog on.  You lot couldn't progress a p**s up in a brewery.

Yours faithfully

I definitely haven't received the NTK via post. I'll respond with as suggested:
---------------------
Dear Sir/Madam,

Due to PoFA 2012,  if driver details are not provided within 28 days of the initial correspondence the keeper can be held liable only if the parking operator has served a compliant NTK by day 56, which in this case has not been served.

You and your client are also in clear breach of the BPA CoP paragraph 24.4. - no reminder or liability notices. 

Yours Faithfully,
--------------------------

I was VERY serious about my wording. It's deliberate so ZZPS know they haven't hooked a credulous victim. Yours is far too polite.

mackenzie2576

Hi Interesting to know what the verdict was did they cancel the ticket or did you end up paying? Thanks

Grizebeck

mackenzie2576 said:

Hi Interesting to know what the verdict was did they cancel the ticket or did you end up paying? Thanks

start your own thread, why would they end up paying when they were taking advice from here

Coupon-mad

mackenzie2576 said:

Hi Interesting to know what the verdict was did they cancel the ticket or did you end up paying? Thanks

Of course they didn't pay. Nobody does unless a rare Judge orders them to.

poshMosh

Hi All - So I've received the debt collection from DCBL 2 weeks ago. As per the guidance, ignoring this until a formal claim is submitted.

poshMosh

Hi All - it's been a while but after few more debt collection letters, I now have received the court claim form from GBP Management. I've attached the pictures within.

Oddly, It mentions I was the driver of the vehicle appealed as the keeper.

In terms of next steps, I should log onto MCOL on the 02/09 (5 days after the Issue date) and advise "I disagree with the claim". I can then use the defence template within the 28 days of the issue date. 

I appreciate everyone helping on this so far. Thank you

Gr1pr

Aos on Tuesday or later 

Your deadline date is then 4pm,  33 days later than the issue date,  which is 28 days after the service date 

Use the template defence by coupon mad,  adapt paragraph 3 to address the POC,  same as all the other recent dcb legal cases 

Please edit your out of date thread title to something more suitable like 

GBP Management,  DCB LEGAL court claim 2025

Coupon-mad

poshMosh said:

Here is the Ticket:

poshMosh said:

Hi All, 

So I've the following response from the company in question and wanted your help to draft a response to it. I've had a search on the forum where they are advising the PoFA 2012 means keep is liable? Your help on this is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Good afternoon,

 

Thank you for your email.

 

Please be advised, if driver details are not provided due to PoFA 2012.

 

The Keeper will remain liable for the charge.

 

Please also note, we have not sent any direct contact to the keeper of the vehicle at this time, our client has only placed a ticket on the vehicle on the day of the contravention.

 

Please provide driver details within seven days.

Fruitcake said:

Ignore it and wait for the NTK whilst of course still pursuing Plan A, complaints from the keeper to the landowner and the keeper's MP.

Umkomaas said:

poshMosh said:

I've just had the first correspondence come through including several texts to get in touch with ZZPS (24th June which is 81 days after the incident date): 

Should I reply back to my original email to obtain POPLA code? 

1. Did you appeal to GB management? If so ..

2. Did you receive a rejection letter? If so ..

3. Did it contain your POPLA Verification Code?

If 2 and/or 3 above are negative, then you must firstly complain to GB Mgt demanding a POPLA code, with 7 day deadline, otherwise, you tell them that you will complain further to the BPA. 

Ignore ZZPS - debt collectors (see NEWBIES FAQ Announcement, fourth post). 

poshMosh said:

Thanks for the response. Couple of answers to your points:

1. I appealed and they rejected
2. Rejection letter stated driver details are to be provided due to PoFa 2012 
3. Not yet - my plan is to reply back to the email asking for the POPLA verification code and also complain formally.


Coupon-mad said:

If there was no NTK reply thusly:

ZZPS,

Stop misleading me about my right to appeal and legal liability.

Due to PoFA 2012 if driver details are not provided within 28 days of the initial correspondence the keeper can be held liable. ONLY if the parking operator has served a compliant NTK by day 56.

You and your client are also in clear breach of the BPA CoP paragraph 24.4.  No NTK. No reminder or liability notices. I believe ZZPS did the back office work in this case so this is your own fault.

You dropped the ball on the required notices.  Threatograms don't cut it.  Jog on.  

Yours faithfully

I definitely haven't received the NTK via post. I'll respond with as suggested:
---------------------
Dear Sir/Madam,

Due to PoFA 2012,  if driver details are not provided within 28 days of the initial correspondence the keeper can be held liable only if the parking operator has served a compliant NTK by day 56, which in this case has not been served.

You and your client are also in clear breach of the BPA CoP paragraph 24.4. - no reminder or liability notices. 

Yours Faithfully,
--------------------------

Show us the rejection letter. Or was it merely that trashy email above pretending you have to name the driver?

Did they ever post a Notice to Keeper? Show us both sides of that, too. But I think they didn't even send one?

They aren't very good at this are they!

ZZPS calling the shots, no NTK at all despite the driver not being identified, then ZZPS repeatedly lying to you about the POFA and liability, refusing to issue a POPLA Code, then suing the keeper knowing full well no POFA paperwork was ever served!

I will be so happy if and when ZZPS & DCB group end up banned in the end.