We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Completion Money Lost From Mortgage Lender

dteezle
Posts: 16 Forumite

Looking for advice on what to do and who is liable.
My mum was due to complete on a house on Monday 15th April. This has still not occurred as of today Wednesday 17th April. As you would gather this is a huge issue causing immense stress to her and her partner, they are currently hopeless and are being told by their solicitor are racking up costs including interest and compensation from the upward chain and that they are liable for all the costs!
They were porting their mortgage across as well as reducing the size of their mortgage. Their lender essentially treats this as ending one product and starting a new one.
They are second in the chain, their house has been sold on Monday and the solicitors have this money (as well as the redemption from the mortgage redemption from this).
Now the hold up is the new mortgage money has not been received by the solicitor and therefore they cannot complete on their purchase.
The lender has said funds were issued 2pm on Monday and as far as their concerned the mortgage is active, as of yesterday they said they traced the money and as far as they were concerned it was with the solicitor's bank.
The solicitor initially blamed their mortgage broker, due to using an outdated "branch" number for an older branch for the solicitor that was closed.
Exchange happened on the 27th March, yet the solicitor on Friday 12th April at 5pm contacted my mum asking to speak to the broker urgently. We think they noticed the error then. Surely the solicitor should have requested funds as soon as exchange occurs?
The solicitor also admitted to noticing an error in the detail and updating these with the lender in the morning of Monday 15th April. However the lender is still still insisting that the funds have been sent to the correct location. They have given my mum a reference number but that's all the proof they say they can provide.
The solicitor's bank is saying the funds are not received and the reference number is not enough to prove the funds are sent and they need physical proof like a screen shot or similar. Lender is saying they can't provide.
Surely the solicitor is liable in this situation, they clearly left it to late to sort the transfer regardless of whether the broker initially put the incorrect details.
The problem is they have their sale funds and know the solicitor can just deduct the costs from this.
Please help with any advice on how to get the banks to find the funds and what rights my mum has.
My mum was due to complete on a house on Monday 15th April. This has still not occurred as of today Wednesday 17th April. As you would gather this is a huge issue causing immense stress to her and her partner, they are currently hopeless and are being told by their solicitor are racking up costs including interest and compensation from the upward chain and that they are liable for all the costs!
They were porting their mortgage across as well as reducing the size of their mortgage. Their lender essentially treats this as ending one product and starting a new one.
They are second in the chain, their house has been sold on Monday and the solicitors have this money (as well as the redemption from the mortgage redemption from this).
Now the hold up is the new mortgage money has not been received by the solicitor and therefore they cannot complete on their purchase.
The lender has said funds were issued 2pm on Monday and as far as their concerned the mortgage is active, as of yesterday they said they traced the money and as far as they were concerned it was with the solicitor's bank.
The solicitor initially blamed their mortgage broker, due to using an outdated "branch" number for an older branch for the solicitor that was closed.
Exchange happened on the 27th March, yet the solicitor on Friday 12th April at 5pm contacted my mum asking to speak to the broker urgently. We think they noticed the error then. Surely the solicitor should have requested funds as soon as exchange occurs?
The solicitor also admitted to noticing an error in the detail and updating these with the lender in the morning of Monday 15th April. However the lender is still still insisting that the funds have been sent to the correct location. They have given my mum a reference number but that's all the proof they say they can provide.
The solicitor's bank is saying the funds are not received and the reference number is not enough to prove the funds are sent and they need physical proof like a screen shot or similar. Lender is saying they can't provide.
Surely the solicitor is liable in this situation, they clearly left it to late to sort the transfer regardless of whether the broker initially put the incorrect details.
The problem is they have their sale funds and know the solicitor can just deduct the costs from this.
Please help with any advice on how to get the banks to find the funds and what rights my mum has.
0
Comments
-
dteezle said:Surely the solicitor should have requested funds as soon as exchange occurs?1
-
On the face of it it sounds like the solicitor's error, so their liability. Raise a formal complaint using the published complaints procedure.
2 -
user1977 said:dteezle said:Surely the solicitor should have requested funds as soon as exchange occurs?0
-
Funds tend to arrive for completion and from what you say above, the funds were sent for completion to occur on 15th so not a solicitor error. What does the receiving bank branch say? There are really only two things that could happen, either the funds are with the receiving bank or the monies have been returned / on the way back to the lender. In our last but one move our funds got ‘lost’ in the system for a couple of hours.2
-
dteezle said:user1977 said:dteezle said:Surely the solicitor should have requested funds as soon as exchange occurs?1
-
Funds aren't allowed to sit with solicitors for more than a few days. However with a chain I'd expect them to be received in advance of the afternoon of completion.2
-
user1977 said:dteezle said:user1977 said:dteezle said:Surely the solicitor should have requested funds as soon as exchange occurs?0
-
The solicitor's bank details would have been on the funds request they sent to the lender. When they submitted this is not relevant as you say that funds were released on time, just to the wrong account. The pertinent question is whether the solicitor put the correct bank details on the funds request?
However, regardless as to whether it is the lender or the solicitor in error, the lender needs to speak with their bank to establish when the funds will be returned. If the account they were sent to is closed then this should happen automatically.3 -
If the bank sent it to the wrong bank details then it will bounce back and at that point they can send the money again. Solicitors can only hold the money for 24-48 hours so they can't have it on exchange.
Something similar happened to my friend, the money was sent but the solicitor had a banking error and the money wasn't recieved and it was returned to the bank. Their completion was about 3 days delayed over the bank holiday weekend.
Money isn't lost, so if the solicitor definitely doesn't have it, it's likely on its way back to the bank assuming the details they sent it to are incorrect.
Who is responsible for the compensation to the other parties all comes down to the issue and who caused it. It's not going to be you though.3 -
dteezle said:user1977 said:dteezle said:user1977 said:dteezle said:Surely the solicitor should have requested funds as soon as exchange occurs?2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 243K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.5K Life & Family
- 256K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards