PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Buying out siblings- is stamp duty payable?

Good afternoon everyone, 

I wanted to get your advice re- whether stamp duty is payable when a sibling is buying out their other siblings from a property (the family home).  If stamp duty is payable is it on the value of the property as a whole or just the portion from the siblings that is being purchased.

Background:
- Property value is £825,000 No mortgage
- The sibling buying out the others owns 58% of the property outright (through inheritance) and has been living in the property for over 20 years.

I really appreciate your thoughts. 

Kind regards, 
Bill

«1

Comments

  • DE_612183
    DE_612183 Posts: 3,363 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    You pay stamp Duty on the chargeable Consideration - so in this case it would be 42% of the 825 ( Split across the rates ) - so about £4800
  • DE_612183
    DE_612183 Posts: 3,363 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Thinking about it - it may be worth looking into buying as two or more separate transactions as the first 250k is free - so it they are treated as two separate transaction you may not pay anything - I don't know enough about the rules though to know if this is correct.
  • Bookworm105
    Bookworm105 Posts: 2,016 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 15 April 2024 at 2:27PM
    There is no exemption from SDLT when purchasing further shares in a property you already own.
    In your case it appears to be the only property owned by the sibling looking to buy the others out so standard rate SDLT applies/
    How much is payable depends on the numbers, as hinted at in the reply above.
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 17,248 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    DE_612183 said:
    Thinking about it - it may be worth looking into buying as two or more separate transactions as the first 250k is free - so it they are treated as two separate transaction you may not pay anything - I don't know enough about the rules though to know if this is correct.
    No, that would be a fairly obvious and wide open loophole! You need to declare transactions which are linked (and the tax is based on the aggregate figures).
  • DE_612183
    DE_612183 Posts: 3,363 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    user1977 said:
    DE_612183 said:
    Thinking about it - it may be worth looking into buying as two or more separate transactions as the first 250k is free - so it they are treated as two separate transaction you may not pay anything - I don't know enough about the rules though to know if this is correct.
    No, that would be a fairly obvious and wide open loophole! You need to declare transactions which are linked (and the tax is based on the aggregate figures).
    I thought as much - but you never know!
  • E201
    E201 Posts: 40 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 10 Posts
    OK thanks everyone for your thoughts and comments. It looks like SDLT (at 5%) is payable on the 42% of the property's value which siblings own together. 
  • DE_612183
    DE_612183 Posts: 3,363 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    E201 said:
    OK thanks everyone for your thoughts and comments. It looks like SDLT (at 5%) is payable on the 42% of the property's value which siblings own together. 
    It's only 5% on the bit above 250k
  • E201
    E201 Posts: 40 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 10 Posts
    Oh yes of course. Thanks very much!
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,112 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    edited 16 April 2024 at 9:34AM
    user1977 said:
    DE_612183 said:
    Thinking about it - it may be worth looking into buying as two or more separate transactions as the first 250k is free - so it they are treated as two separate transaction you may not pay anything - I don't know enough about the rules though to know if this is correct.
    No, that would be a fairly obvious and wide open loophole! You need to declare transactions which are linked (and the tax is based on the aggregate figures).
    Not necessarily disagreeing with you, but people often staircase on shared ownership properties, where they buy further shares of the property in stages, so I wouldn’t automatically say that it is a loophole. 
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages, student & coronavirus Boards, money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 17,248 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    silvercar said:
    user1977 said:
    DE_612183 said:
    Thinking about it - it may be worth looking into buying as two or more separate transactions as the first 250k is free - so it they are treated as two separate transaction you may not pay anything - I don't know enough about the rules though to know if this is correct.
    No, that would be a fairly obvious and wide open loophole! You need to declare transactions which are linked (and the tax is based on the aggregate figures).
    Not necessarily disagreeing with you, but people often staircase on shared ownership properties, where they buy further shares of the property in stages, so I wouldn’t automatically say that it is a loophole. 
    Yes, but those are quite specific provisions for shared ownership properties.

    You can't just split up the price in a "normal" transaction into tax-free chunks, otherwise that's what everybody would do.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.