PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Buying out siblings- is stamp duty payable?

Options
2»

Comments

  • DE_612183
    DE_612183 Posts: 3,835 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    user1977 said:
    silvercar said:
    user1977 said:
    DE_612183 said:
    Thinking about it - it may be worth looking into buying as two or more separate transactions as the first 250k is free - so it they are treated as two separate transaction you may not pay anything - I don't know enough about the rules though to know if this is correct.
    No, that would be a fairly obvious and wide open loophole! You need to declare transactions which are linked (and the tax is based on the aggregate figures).
    Not necessarily disagreeing with you, but people often staircase on shared ownership properties, where they buy further shares of the property in stages, so I wouldn’t automatically say that it is a loophole. 
    Yes, but those are quite specific provisions for shared ownership properties.

    You can't just split up the price in a "normal" transaction into tax-free chunks, otherwise that's what everybody would do.
    not really - most transactions are one off - you never really buy 25% of a property and then another 25% a few weeks later.

    However, in this case the £4-5k Stamp is probably not far off what you'd need to pay for a solicitor and the transactions etc so not worth while - but if the property was a lot bigger I'm not sure what could be done about it - how could prove the transactions were not linked and just two separate ones?


  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,274 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Just a thought - is the property held by executors at the moment?
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 17,897 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    DE_612183 said:
    user1977 said:
    silvercar said:
    user1977 said:
    DE_612183 said:
    Thinking about it - it may be worth looking into buying as two or more separate transactions as the first 250k is free - so it they are treated as two separate transaction you may not pay anything - I don't know enough about the rules though to know if this is correct.
    No, that would be a fairly obvious and wide open loophole! You need to declare transactions which are linked (and the tax is based on the aggregate figures).
    Not necessarily disagreeing with you, but people often staircase on shared ownership properties, where they buy further shares of the property in stages, so I wouldn’t automatically say that it is a loophole. 
    Yes, but those are quite specific provisions for shared ownership properties.

    You can't just split up the price in a "normal" transaction into tax-free chunks, otherwise that's what everybody would do.
    not really - most transactions are one off - you never really buy 25% of a property and then another 25% a few weeks later.

    However, in this case the £4-5k Stamp is probably not far off what you'd need to pay for a solicitor and the transactions etc so not worth while - but if the property was a lot bigger I'm not sure what could be done about it - how could prove the transactions were not linked and just two separate ones?

    I would have thought it normally reasonably obvious from the circumstances. But in any event, we're not here to give people advice about how to get away with tax evasion...
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.