We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Schengen/EU entry and 10 year passport rules
Comments
-
Getting competent CS staff who know what they're doing seems rare in any industry. Banking staff are even worse.mtc95 said:
Yes, he has just written about another similar case.la531983 said:Also contact Simon Calder, he has a proper bee in his bonnet at the moment on this issue (and rightly so).
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/passport-brexit-klm-denied-boarding-paris-b2702858.html
It's hard to believe that travel staff are still getting this wrong.
But all the confusion is so unnecessary, the EU could have simply allowed reasonable transitional arrangements rather than being petty about this issue. I have an EU passport, issued under EU rules, fair enough bring the UK into line with everyone else for new passports, but what harm would there have been in continuing to allow a few extra months over 10 years for passports issued when were still in the EU.
It's almost like they want to punish us for Brexit, even though I imagine the vast majority of people who regularly travel to the EU probably voted against Brexit and are already annoyed enough about losing their EU citizenship.0 -
Quoting Simon Calder again but he completely rejects this belief that we are being "punished" by the EU He says it is the UK government that insisted on this.
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/eu-brexit-red-tape-travel-entry-exit-system-etias-b2601368.html
See myth 2.0 -
That's all about the EES/ETIAS, which is a couple of years overdue, nothing to do with passport validity. There is no reason they couldn't have allowed a transition period for passports valid a few months over 10 years and issued while we were still in the EU. The EU set the entry criteria for EU countries/Schengen, not the UK. The UK did not insist that passports issued more than 10 years ago stopped being valid for travel to the EU.mtc95 said:Quoting Simon Calder again but he completely rejects this belief that we are being "punished" by the EU He says it is the UK government that insisted on this.
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/eu-brexit-red-tape-travel-entry-exit-system-etias-b2601368.html
See myth 2.
The article is basically a rant, banging on about "third country nationals like East Timor and Venezuela". That's an interesting choice of examples, why not countries like USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc. Basically any country not in the EU/EEA/EFTA.
Obviously East Timor and Venezuela are the first such countries that popped into his head. Wonder why?0 -
From what I have read on the EU and Netherlands Embassy websites it is not them causing the issue. It is the ground staff doing check in misinterpreting or being misinformed by their employers about passport validity.zagfles said:
That's all about the EES/ETIAS, which is a couple of years overdue, nothing to do with passport validity. There is no reason they couldn't have allowed a transition period for passports valid a few months over 10 years and issued while we were still in the EU. The EU set the entry criteria for EU countries/Schengen, not the UK. The UK did not insist that passports issued more than 10 years ago stopped being valid for travel to the EU.mtc95 said:Quoting Simon Calder again but he completely rejects this belief that we are being "punished" by the EU He says it is the UK government that insisted on this.
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/eu-brexit-red-tape-travel-entry-exit-system-etias-b2601368.html
See myth 2.
The article is basically a rant, banging on about "third country nationals like East Timor and Venezuela". That's an interesting choice of examples, why not countries like USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc. Basically any country not in the EU/EEA/EFTA.
Obviously East Timor and Venezuela are the first such countries that popped into his head. Wonder why?
As an aside the hotel kindly cancelled my booking and didn't charge me even though it was a non refundable booking. My losses are limited to my museum bookings so now only €800 -
Yes, but the point was the rules have become complex enough to confuse ground staff. They've confused enough people here. The EU were quite happy to accept passports issued over 10 years ago to enter Schengen when we were in the EU, they might not have done for third countries but they could have allowed a transition for passports issued before Brexit. It would have been a trivial concession. But they didn't.cumbrianmale said:
From what I have read on the EU and Netherlands Embassy websites it is not them causing the issue. It is the ground staff doing check in misinterpreting or being misinformed by their employers about passport validity.zagfles said:
That's all about the EES/ETIAS, which is a couple of years overdue, nothing to do with passport validity. There is no reason they couldn't have allowed a transition period for passports valid a few months over 10 years and issued while we were still in the EU. The EU set the entry criteria for EU countries/Schengen, not the UK. The UK did not insist that passports issued more than 10 years ago stopped being valid for travel to the EU.mtc95 said:Quoting Simon Calder again but he completely rejects this belief that we are being "punished" by the EU He says it is the UK government that insisted on this.
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/eu-brexit-red-tape-travel-entry-exit-system-etias-b2601368.html
See myth 2.
The article is basically a rant, banging on about "third country nationals like East Timor and Venezuela". That's an interesting choice of examples, why not countries like USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc. Basically any country not in the EU/EEA/EFTA.
Obviously East Timor and Venezuela are the first such countries that popped into his head. Wonder why?
As an aside the hotel kindly cancelled my booking and didn't charge me even though it was a non refundable booking. My losses are limited to my museum bookings so now only €80
Good news on the hotel, a lot of hotels will cancel non cancellable bookings. Still worth pursuing with the airline as it might educate them0 -
Back in 2018, when the news of this passport validity change first became known, I asked 2 European friends (1 Greek and 1 Swedish) how long their passports were valid for. Both told me 5 years and were surprised that we were allowed 10 years.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards