DCBLegal (Claim Form) - Met Parking Services Ltd (Stansted) - HELP Please, transferred so far away

Coupon-mad

Irrelevant because the wording is likely non-POFA anyway, so who cares about the dates?!

raislander

sorry I don't follow, why it's irrelevant and what you mean by the wording been non-POFA? do you mean the wording in the NTK? And just to be clear, should I then attach to my email the NTK original, or shouldn't be needed. 

UncleThomasCobley

raislander said:

To be honest my intention is where possible to put this to an end they've been sending letters for months now. 

I plan to send them the email/letter by the end of the 30-day period. 

I don't understand... You want to put this to an end but you also want to extend it by another 30 days. Which is it? What is the 30 day hold going to achieve for you?

Regarding the PoFA dates, they are only relevant if the original NtK was PoFA compliant anyway. If it was, then the "deemed" delivery date was 2 working days after the date on the NtK. What actual date you received it is irrelevant.

You don't need to attach a copy of the NtK to the response.

patient_dream

UncleThomasCobley said:

You only need to request a 30 day hold if you absolutely require more time. It does not give you any advantage by delaying these spurious claims though.

So, (a)... only if absolutely really necessary. No real advantage for anything.
(b)... only if applicable.
©... You do not need to mention anything about being the driver, whether true or not. You only need to make sure that you are corresponding as the Registered Keeper (RK) and as such, you cannot be held liable for the PCN as this occurred on non-relevant land covered by airport bylaws.

Only the driver can be held liable and there is no legal obligation for you, as the RK, to identify the driver and no assumptions can be made. Therefore, MET parking should cancel the PCN.

For my interest Uncle Tom, are we certain this is Airport land

UncleThomasCobley

patient_dream said:

For my interest Uncle Tom, are we certain this is Airport land

Absolutely. I have previously searched the bylaws for Stansted and found a map that covers the area. It goes right up to the A14.

I posted a link to it some time ago (under a different username).

raislander

UncleThomasCobley said:

raislander said:

To be honest my intention is where possible to put this to an end they've been sending letters for months now. 

I plan to send them the email/letter by the end of the 30-day period. 

I don't understand... You want to put this to an end but you also want to extend it by another 30 days. Which is it? What is the 30 day hold going to achieve for you?

Regarding the PoFA dates, they are only relevant if the original NtK was PoFA compliant anyway. If it was, then the "deemed" delivery date was 2 working days after the date on the NtK. What actual date you received it is irrelevant.

You don't need to attach a copy of the NtK to the response.

My intention with this reply is indeed to end up the process and put an end to this. I just included the extension of 30 days or to hold the process for 30 days as the original letter I found had it, but also wanted to keep the statement that I don't recognize any debt with them. 

An in regards to the NtK I have no idea whether it is PoFA compliance or not. I can add a copy of it if that helps. 

I understood from your previous comment that there is even more support for my claim to cancel the PCN, based on not being liable for the PCN as this occurred on non-relevant land covered by airport bylaws. Is there any law or supporting regulation I could mention to support such statement?

patient_dream

UncleThomasCobley said:

patient_dream said:

For my interest Uncle Tom, are we certain this is Airport land

Absolutely. I have previously searched the bylaws for Stansted and found a map that covers the area. It goes right up to the A14.

I posted a link to it some time ago (under a different username).

Thanks ..... so onwards and upwards to crush CST

raislander

Coupon-mad said:

Irrelevant because the wording is likely non-POFA anyway, so who cares about the dates?!

HI Coupon-mad, I read a post from you regarding precisely Standsted Airport grounds to be non-relevant land and as such RK cannot be name liable under POFA, which I understand should also be pointed out in my reply to the LBC to CST LAW. 

Could you help me word and sustain that claim? I'm not aware of the exact schedules in POFA that would support this claim. 

If any one else feels they can help on adding the wording to the reply letter I'd appreciate that support. 

patient_dream

The famous MET parking scam site which really is a mega scam.

It's odd, MET parking have been using the "chicken out" legal DCBL ...... why CST now ?

All you have to do is read the CST GROUP THREAD which clearly MET have not read, MET and CST should read it to understand 

Wonder if MET actually has an intelligence?

The CST letter says they have sufficient evidence ro bring a claim ?  How stupid are CST ..... THERE IS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO PROVE THIS IS A SCAM SITE OPERATED BY MET PARKING......

So, you will ask for a 30 day extension, that's right

CST LAW must have better things to do than threaten people with the GREAT MET PARKING scam at Stansted
HOW STUPID

Coupon-mad

raislander said:

Coupon-mad said:

Irrelevant because the wording is likely non-POFA anyway, so who cares about the dates?!

HI Coupon-mad, I read a post from you regarding precisely Standsted Airport grounds to be non-relevant land and as such RK cannot be name liable under POFA, which I understand should also be pointed out in my reply to the LBC to CST LAW. 

Could you help me word and sustain that claim? I'm not aware of the exact schedules in POFA that would support this claim. 

If any one else feels they can help on adding the wording to the reply letter I'd appreciate that support. 

Please show us a pic of the NTK front & back, with any QR code, PCN ref & your data covered.