Parking court claim

UncleThomasCobley

Coupon-mad said:

Yes that'll do.

Sign & date it and email it to the CNBC on a working day next week, after reading the first 12 steps in the first post of the Template defence thread, because to keep us sane, we try to avoid questions about the next form/stage...thanks!

See you at Witness Statement stage in 2024.

With CEL v Chan, it should never reach that stage. 

Goodprof

Should I order a new transcript of CEL v Chan, because what I have found here after printing and scanning it's hard to read.

This is the best I can do.

Goodprof

Not relevant, have found it online foc

Le_Kirk

Searching the forum should find it included in defence by @hharry100 or the NEWBIE or the template defence thread but hey ho, you've found it.

Goodprof

Do not be surprised to receive an early copy of the Claimant's Directions Questionnaire and the usual intimidating template letter saying they 'intend to proceed'. Nothing of interest there. Just file it.

Should I do anything if I haven’t received it? I had to send the CDQ by 8 of jan and have done it, but received nothing from the other party. 

Coupon-mad

Goodprof said:

Do not be surprised to receive an early copy of the Claimant's Directions Questionnaire and the usual intimidating template letter saying they 'intend to proceed'. Nothing of interest there. Just file it.

Should I do anything if I haven’t received it? I had to send the CDQ by 8 of jan and have done it, but received nothing from the other party. 

What does your MCOL history say?

Goodprof

Coupon-mad said:

Goodprof said:

Do not be surprised to receive an early copy of the Claimant's Directions Questionnaire and the usual intimidating template letter saying they 'intend to proceed'. Nothing of interest there. Just file it.

Should I do anything if I haven’t received it? I had to send the CDQ by 8 of jan and have done it, but received nothing from the other party. 

What does your MCOL history say?

- Case stay lifted on 22/12/2023
- DQ sent to you on 22/12/2023
- DQ filed by claimant on 22/12/2023

Coupon-mad

So you have both done your DQs, only they couldn't be bothered to serve a copy to you.  The court won't care.  Sit tight.

Goodprof

So I've got some updates now. The hearing will be in July and I need to send copies of all the documents to the court and to the other side. I also have received those from the other side. 

First of all

"The Claimant, without intending any discourtesy to the court, hereby gives notice that it will not be attending the final hearing."

They obviously attached my appeal to them with a bulshit information I gave them at the schools owners suggestion. Should I mention him as a witness?

And also from their defence:

The Defendant is using a generic defence which can be found on the internet and it is highly doubtful that the Defendant would understand the complexities of all the references of the Civil Procedure Rules etc

All the way I am feeling that I am in sh*t

LDast

Goodprof said:

"The Claimant, without intending any discourtesy to the court, hereby gives notice that it will not be attending the final hearing."

The Defendant is using a generic defence which can be found on the internet and it is highly doubtful that the Defendant would understand the complexities of all the references of the Civil Procedure Rules etc

All the way I am feeling that I am in sh*t

The Claimant always say that they won't be attending. They will however send a "rent-a-rep" from some local firm who will have little to no idea about the claim.

Regarding the slanderous claim about the 'generic internet defence' and the witnesses assumption that the claimant  is some sort of bumbling yokel who is unable to understand it all, that is up to you whether you want to respond to that claim. Personally, if they'd put that in a WS to a claim I was defending, I'd be submitting a SWS asking the court to have the claimants WS struck out for that slanderous assumption which is tantamount to unreasonable behaviour. Their witness has no idea who you or I are and what level of education we have achieved and whether we are able to understand the legal process or not.