We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Barclays closed my current account - warning to other expats
Comments
-
Unfortunately not, but thanks for the suggestion.ToastLady said:Revolut have opened in New Zealand now, albeit without a banking licence at the moment. Would it be possible to have your pension paid in there, and then you can whip it out to your own bank in New Zealand after currency conversion?0 -
GeordieinAotearoa said:
I do! Barclays said as much.jaypers said:Blame Brexit!Of course they would. So much more palatable than telling you they can't be bothered to keep your accounts open when it is more hassle (to them) than it is worth. A standard MO of corporations to say "we are unable to" when what they mean is "we don't want to".Somewhere there is a quote from the FCA saying that whether to provide accounts to people living overseas is a commercial decision for the individual banks, not a matter of regulation. If I can find the quote I'll copy it here (unless someone finds it before me)The first post in this thread -
1 -
That is very far from the truth: I have opened bank accounts in several different countries, usually because I was working there. My US bank account was opened simply because my employer (in West Africa) paid me from an office in the USA.km1500 said:yes it is annoying - it would presumably be equally difficult for me (living in the uk) to get a current account in another country1 -
Section62 said:GeordieinAotearoa said:
I do! Barclays said as much.jaypers said:Blame Brexit!Of course they would. So much more palatable than telling you they can't be bothered to keep your accounts open when it is more hassle (to them) than it is worth. A standard MO of corporations to say "we are unable to" when what they mean is "we don't want to".Somewhere there is a quote from the FCA saying that whether to provide accounts to people living overseas is a commercial decision for the individual banks, not a matter of regulation. If I can find the quote I'll copy it here (unless someone finds it before me)The first post in this thread -
The FCA has no say in the regulations of other countries. Banks, however, have to comply with the regulations of the countries they are offering a service in. Providing a current account to a resident of country X means that they have to have a licence, or a passporting arrangement, for country X.
1 -
friolento said:Section62 said:GeordieinAotearoa said:
I do! Barclays said as much.jaypers said:Blame Brexit!Of course they would. So much more palatable than telling you they can't be bothered to keep your accounts open when it is more hassle (to them) than it is worth. A standard MO of corporations to say "we are unable to" when what they mean is "we don't want to".Somewhere there is a quote from the FCA saying that whether to provide accounts to people living overseas is a commercial decision for the individual banks, not a matter of regulation. If I can find the quote I'll copy it here (unless someone finds it before me)The first post in this thread -
The FCA has no say in the regulations of other countries. Banks, however, have to comply with the regulations of the countries they are offering a service in. Providing a current account to a resident of country X means that they have to have a licence, or a passporting arrangement, for country X.So what banking regulations changed in New Zealand as a result of Brexit?Because if the FCA are saying there is no regulatory issue (from a UK perspective) then it could only be something New Zealand have done (or not done) which has led Barclays to close the OP's account ("due to Brexit")...or it could be that the somewhat more obvious explanation is correct - that Barclays simply don't want to provide banking facilities to people not living in the UK.3 -
I think this is the issue. The costs and fraud risks associated with overseas account holders probably make them "bad for business" in a strict sense and being a long term account holder has little value today. I had an account with Nat West for 15 years after I left the UK and eventually received a letter saying that they would be closing the account because of lack of activity. I had ample time to contact Nat West and they offered to keep the account open if I was going to use it, but I decided to close it and withdrew the balance of a few hundred pounds.Section62 said:friolento said:Section62 said:GeordieinAotearoa said:
I do! Barclays said as much.jaypers said:Blame Brexit!Of course they would. So much more palatable than telling you they can't be bothered to keep your accounts open when it is more hassle (to them) than it is worth. A standard MO of corporations to say "we are unable to" when what they mean is "we don't want to".Somewhere there is a quote from the FCA saying that whether to provide accounts to people living overseas is a commercial decision for the individual banks, not a matter of regulation. If I can find the quote I'll copy it here (unless someone finds it before me)The first post in this thread -
The FCA has no say in the regulations of other countries. Banks, however, have to comply with the regulations of the countries they are offering a service in. Providing a current account to a resident of country X means that they have to have a licence, or a passporting arrangement, for country X....or it could be that the somewhat more obvious explanation is correct - that Barclays simply don't want to provide banking facilities to people not living in the UK.
we’ve certainly gained in convenience in so many ways with internet banking and cashless payments, but many less common services have been sacrificed on the alter of efficiency.And so we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.4 -
When we were EU members that had to provide the service if you went to another EU country and it did not cost them much more to include NZ. Now that they do not have to provide the service at all, they have decided to discontinue it.Section62 said:friolento said:Section62 said:GeordieinAotearoa said:
I do! Barclays said as much.jaypers said:Blame Brexit!Of course they would. So much more palatable than telling you they can't be bothered to keep your accounts open when it is more hassle (to them) than it is worth. A standard MO of corporations to say "we are unable to" when what they mean is "we don't want to".Somewhere there is a quote from the FCA saying that whether to provide accounts to people living overseas is a commercial decision for the individual banks, not a matter of regulation. If I can find the quote I'll copy it here (unless someone finds it before me)The first post in this thread -
The FCA has no say in the regulations of other countries. Banks, however, have to comply with the regulations of the countries they are offering a service in. Providing a current account to a resident of country X means that they have to have a licence, or a passporting arrangement, for country X.So what banking regulations changed in New Zealand as a result of Brexit?Because if the FCA are saying there is no regulatory issue (from a UK perspective) then it could only be something New Zealand have done (or not done) which has led Barclays to close the OP's account ("due to Brexit")...or it could be that the somewhat more obvious explanation is correct - that Barclays simply don't want to provide banking facilities to people not living in the UK.
4 -
yes but presumably you had a local US address. ie you were not living in the UK and trying to open a US bank account ?Voyager2002 said:
That is very far from the truth: I have opened bank accounts in several different countries, usually because I was working there. My US bank account was opened simply because my employer (in West Africa) paid me from an office in the USA.km1500 said:yes it is annoying - it would presumably be equally difficult for me (living in the uk) to get a current account in another country0 -
^The second time it has been claimed banks were in some way "forced" to keep accounts open if people moved to another EU country (although not if the person remained in the UK) - but is that really the case? What was the regulation that required banks to maintain the accounts of people as they moved round Europe, but not if they stayed at home? (genuine question)GeoffTF said:
When we were EU members that had to provide the service if you went to another EU country and it did not cost them much more to include NZ. Now that they do not have to provide the service at all, they have decided to discontinue it.Section62 said:friolento said:Section62 said:GeordieinAotearoa said:
I do! Barclays said as much.jaypers said:Blame Brexit!Of course they would. So much more palatable than telling you they can't be bothered to keep your accounts open when it is more hassle (to them) than it is worth. A standard MO of corporations to say "we are unable to" when what they mean is "we don't want to".Somewhere there is a quote from the FCA saying that whether to provide accounts to people living overseas is a commercial decision for the individual banks, not a matter of regulation. If I can find the quote I'll copy it here (unless someone finds it before me)The first post in this thread -
The FCA has no say in the regulations of other countries. Banks, however, have to comply with the regulations of the countries they are offering a service in. Providing a current account to a resident of country X means that they have to have a licence, or a passporting arrangement, for country X.So what banking regulations changed in New Zealand as a result of Brexit?Because if the FCA are saying there is no regulatory issue (from a UK perspective) then it could only be something New Zealand have done (or not done) which has led Barclays to close the OP's account ("due to Brexit")...or it could be that the somewhat more obvious explanation is correct - that Barclays simply don't want to provide banking facilities to people not living in the UK.Is your assertion "it did not cost them much more to include NZ" based on some kind of evidence, or just a guess?Does anyone actually know whether Barclays were providing a service in New Zealand under NZ regulations, or whether they were providing a service in the UK which just happened to be used by people living elsewhere? ....Possibly without Barclays knowing where in the world their permanent residence is.1 -
Then why does it still offer accounts to expats or whomever in 70 countries? That was just an answer to fob you off with or from someone who doesn't really know. It's probably more to do with a customer's net worth - it wants international customers with deposits/investments with it of £100k+. It does seem that it does not want to offer accounts in New Zealand, though, so there might something specific about this country.GeordieinAotearoa said:
Barclays actually told me that it was because of Brexit. Something to do with changes in cross-border financial regulation as a result of our leaving the EU.wmb194 said:
I'm sorry, you're going to have to spell out to me how it's relevant to the OP in New Zealand and Barclays outside the EU. The article you've linked doesn't explain it to me.jaypers said:
Edit: And Barclays used to have continental Europe EU subsidiaries but post-GFC it closed most (all?) of them so of course it no longer has local banking licences.
https://international.barclays.com/#:~:text=Wherever%20you%20are%20in%20the,global%20ambitions%20for%20330%20years.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
