Stansted McDonalds County Court Claim

patient_dream

mcdeesparkingfine said:

Just to (hopefully) draw a line under this, court order received throwing out the claim as the amended POC are not capable of demonstrating a contract between the claimant and driver plus a bunch of other criticisms. They allowed 7 days for parties to apply to have this order set aside, and as far as I can see no application has been submitted so looks like it is all over. Thank you so much to all who helped!

The point is, how can DCBL ever describe this MET parking scam ay Stansted

Even if DCBL; DID REQUEST A SET ASIDE, what difference would it make, DCBL would get spanked in court anyway. They are famous for discontinuations and wasting the courts time, it has not gone un-noticed

MET need to use their brains and turn this double scam car park into ONE

And the BPA ?    what have they done to stop this MET scam site at Stansted
NOTHING ..... as usual

Le_Kirk

Coupon-mad said:

mcdeesparkingfine said:

sure, this is it <SNIP>

I have added a screenshot of the paragraphs referred to in that Order and I wonder if @Le_Kirk can add these two together at the bottom of the 'judgment's' link.

Will do but it might be a couple of days this time as I have just changed to a new PC and am still busy putting it as I like it (thanks Microsoft and Windows 11) and transferring files from old to new system!

Le_Kirk

It is done using same link Judgments

Coupon-mad

Perfect, thanks.