UK PC Claims received

Bazarius

Ignore it .  It has no effect on the judgment set aside . What does it say in the redacted bit ? 

At least you tried to use the “ slip rule” there’s no point paying for it to be amended . The judge will probably get angry with the court manager for not doing their job properly . 

LionsShare

Coupon-mad said:

LionsShare said:

A Google search gives the following:

Judicial review claim form: N461

Nononono!

They just mean N244 like you did before. Another application. It would cost £119 though (tick 'without a hearing).

I see.
Aaarghh! 

LionsShare

Bazarius said:

Ignore it .  It has no effect on the judgment set aside . What does it say in the redacted bit ? 

At least you tried to use the “ slip rule” there’s no point paying for it to be amended . The judge will probably get angry with the court manager for not doing their job properly . 

Just means I won't get my costs which were actually awarded in the hearing but no mention of that on the Order. The redacted bit is just a list of all the other claim numbers needing to be consolidated. I have heard nothing further about that either.

Coupon-mad

Probably worth £119 to get the order put right and the costs order restored but I'd send this N244 stating in the covering email that you asked under the 'slip rule' because these are court-made errors in the Order.  As such you don't see why you should have to formally apply again, having already paid the court service £xxx so far for x N244s and you would kindly ask the Court Manager to ring you on NUMBER to either take payment (which you will then reserve the right to later lodge a complaint about, given the errors are the Court's mistakes and mindful that the Overriding Objective is 'justice at low cost') or to confirm no fee is needed.

LionsShare

Thanks @Coupon-mad. Will do.