We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
DCB legal going to court for parking
Comments
-
The OP has already accessed MCOL and found what is stored (as shown above).
I've also personally seen defences people put in using MCOL which were a similar length.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
B789 said:The OP on this thread could request a copy of their defence from CCBC/MCOL and we can then see definitively what it actually is.
He showed us the filed Defence in his post on 9 June at 3:40PM.1 -
Lwalker89 said:Thank you for the replies, i did use the defence template on here, although a maximum amount of characters on the court website restricted me so I didn't use the full wording.
If it is different from what the CCBC/MCOL have told me, I will get back to them and request that they change their guidance notes to inform on the precise character count for defences.0 -
B789 said:Well, if I'm correct based on information provided by CCBC/MCOL, the only part of that defence received by the CCBC will literally be:DEFENCE 1. The parking charges referred to in
this claim did not arise from any agreement
of terms. The charge and the claim was an une
xpected shock. The Defendant denies that the
Claimant is entitled to relief in the sum cla
imed, or at all. It is denied that any conduc
t by the driver was a breach of any prominent
term and it is denied that this Claimant (un
derstood to have a bare licence as managers)
has standing to sue or form contracts in thei
r own name. Liability is denied, whether or n
ot the Claimant is claiming 'keeper liability
', which is unclear from the Particulars. The
facts as known to the Defendant: 2. The Defe
ndant was the registered keeper of the vehicl
e in question. The Claim relates to an allege
d debt arising from the driver's alleged brea
ch of contract, which is denied. It is furthe
r denied that there was any agreement to pay
the Claimant a £100 'parking charge notice' (
PCN). 3. The defendant denies being made awar
e of any such contract and therefore denies t
hat any contract agreement was entered betwee
n the two parties. ii. The lack of an entranc24 lines of 45 characters, unformatted.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards