We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Nationwide's 'Fairer Share' £100 payment for eligible members
Comments
-
Exodi said:Tom_Hendo said:I've had a weird one with this, wanted to share in case anyone had the same questions.
I was eligible (Paid £700 in Jan, Feb and March each, conveniently) however I closed my account in the middle of April and now have no Nationwide account to pay into.
I called the team at Nationwide, and as I am eligible for the period they measured, they said as long as I have a current account open (New, existing or any) when they make the payment, I should still receive it into the most relevant account.
Even on the main page (https://www.nationwide.co.uk/about-us/fairer-share/) it says:
This is then expanded on in the terms and conditions (https://www.nationwide.co.uk/about-us/fairer-share/terms-and-conditions/):If you’re eligible, you can expect to receive the payment between 13 and 30 June 2023. You don’t need to do anything. So long as you still have an open current account with us, we’ll transfer it straight to you.Are there any other exclusions?
Yes, you will not be eligible to receive the payment if any of the following apply:You do not have a current account with us on the day we are due to make the payment.And also further down:"When and how will the payment be made?
...
We will not make the payment in any other way and if you do not have an open Nationwide current account when we try to make the payment, you will not be eligible to receive it (see ‘Are there any other exclusions?’ above)."If you want me to definitely see your reply, please tag me @forumuser7 Thank you.
N.B. (Amended from Forum Rules): You must investigate, and check several times, before you make any decisions or take any action based on any information you glean from any of my content, as nothing I post is advice, rather it is personal opinion and is solely for discussion purposes. I research before my posts, and I never intend to share anything that is misleading, misinforming, or out of date, but don't rely on everything you read. Some of the information changes quickly, is my own opinion or may be incorrect. Verify anything you read before acting on it to protect yourself because you are responsible for any action you consequently make... DYOR, YMMV etc.1 -
ForumUser7 said:Exodi said:Tom_Hendo said:I've had a weird one with this, wanted to share in case anyone had the same questions.
I was eligible (Paid £700 in Jan, Feb and March each, conveniently) however I closed my account in the middle of April and now have no Nationwide account to pay into.
I called the team at Nationwide, and as I am eligible for the period they measured, they said as long as I have a current account open (New, existing or any) when they make the payment, I should still receive it into the most relevant account.
Even on the main page (https://www.nationwide.co.uk/about-us/fairer-share/) it says:
This is then expanded on in the terms and conditions (https://www.nationwide.co.uk/about-us/fairer-share/terms-and-conditions/):If you’re eligible, you can expect to receive the payment between 13 and 30 June 2023. You don’t need to do anything. So long as you still have an open current account with us, we’ll transfer it straight to you.Are there any other exclusions?
Yes, you will not be eligible to receive the payment if any of the following apply:You do not have a current account with us on the day we are due to make the payment.And also further down:"When and how will the payment be made?
...
We will not make the payment in any other way and if you do not have an open Nationwide current account when we try to make the payment, you will not be eligible to receive it (see ‘Are there any other exclusions?’ above)."Know what you don't1 -
Exodi said:km1500 said:for me the problem with the way they have done it is that there are not just a few members 'on the edge' who have missed out - there are very very large number of members who have missed out and that is fundamentally unfair
Where would you set the goalposts? Half the bonus, remove the current account requirement but increase the savings/mortgage balance needed to double the amount of members eligible? What about the objections from people that are £1 short of the savings requirement?
For a bank, if you have one share you get one share of the distributed profits and it doesn't matter if you have accounts with them or if you have had the share one day or 20 years
Nationwide should do the same5 -
Exodi said:
As this is a share of profits from the past year, it's seems reasonable to share this with the demographic of members who may have materially contributed to this profit. I feel the difficulty is in where you set the goalposts. I'm not sure if you've stated your view on this (or if you'd have them?).As the excess profit has developed over the year, is it reasonable to share the funds with the demographic who just happened to be active in the last two or three months of the financial year? Particularly when those three months approximately coincided with a promotion which would have seen people who didn't use their current account in a way which would have made them eligible for the £100 suddenly becoming eligible because they decided to pursue the free £30? Is that a fair and representative measure of each member's contribution to the society?I have stated my own view on what a fair and reasonable approach might be. But I'm not banging on about that because I don't think any one of us individually has the right to say it should have been done 'x' way and no other. This is something which the membership as a whole should have had the opportunity to debate and vote on.Are you a member of the Connect forum? Were you one of the select few who were invited to take part in a survey on how this money should be distributed? ....although you probably shouldn't say if you were, as participants were told not to discuss it with anyone, not even within the Connect forum itself. Are you comfortable with that level of secrecy about decisions over the way in which Member's money is distributed? Personally I think it is totally alien to the principles of mutuality.I'd like to say more, but I can't rule out the possibility that simply mentioning the existence of that survey might be enough to get me banned from Connect, so I'm going no further than that here.3 -
km1500 said:the answer is simple - it is a mutual society owned by their members so every member should get an equal share in the same way for example as a bank distributes profits to shareholders
comparing the free Nationwide membership with a shareholder who bought a share is apples and pears3 -
They want to retain active current account holders...simples...
People will always shop around for best mortgage/saving accts and even open up ghost current account to access best savings accounts.
The holy grail is getting people to really move their current accounts and retaining the same.
So that is what they want to encourage..
Stop moaning !0 -
Band7 said:km1500 said:the answer is simple - it is a mutual society owned by their members so every member should get an equal share in the same way for example as a bank distributes profits to shareholders
Why should the person paying back their £200k mortgage over the last 5 years miss out completely because they paid £501 into their current account in February, but only £499 in March?3 -
Ciprico said:They want to retain active current account holders...simples...
People will always shop around for best mortgage/saving accts and even open up ghost current account to access best savings accounts.
The holy grail is getting people to really move their current accounts and retaining the same.
So that is what they want to encourage..
Stop moaning !5 -
Section62 said:Band7 said:km1500 said:the answer is simple - it is a mutual society owned by their members so every member should get an equal share in the same way for example as a bank distributes profits to shareholders
Why should the person paying back their £200k mortgage over the last 5 years miss out completely because they paid £501 into their current account in February, but only £499 in March?
I am just not in favour of members with nothing but long-term dormant accounts. Thus I am against that all members should get an equal share.3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards