CAPITAL CAR PARK CONTROL / DBL LEGAL COSTA COFFEE PCNs

Coupon-mad

All good (with the above tweaks) as long as the Claimant hasn't sent further and better Particulars/evidence after your successful CCJ set aside hearing, or provided they didn't already send a load of photos and evidence with a detailed witness statement before that hearing?

If they did, then you can't say you don't know from the POC what the claim is all about.

Remove this from 2, as it's already in para one:

" but liability is denied."

Metaphysicist

Coupon-mad said:

All good (with the above tweaks) as long as the Claimant hasn't sent further and better Particulars/evidence after your successful CCJ set aside hearing, or provided they didn't already send a load of photos and evidence with a detailed witness statement before that hearing?

If they did, then you can't say you don't know from the POC what the claim is all about.

Remove this from 2, as it's already in para one:

" but liability is denied."

Hi, thanks for that! Claimant had a bunch of photos that they had with them in the hearing yes. So I take it I cannot deny liability? Remove that from the defence? Thanks for all the help everyone you guys are great! 

Metaphysicist

Umkomaas said:

Here is my defence guys. Any tips or advice appreciated!!

Some of your page numbering shows 'x of 10', others are showing 'x of 13'. Needs checking. 

What could help is if any part of the claim (or their Witness Statement or Evidence Bundle) is showing 'Terry Szmidt (T/A)'. Just search for that in any of the paperwork you have from them. 

Yes it does. Thanks 

Not clear what you're meaning. If somewhere their document(s) is saying 'Terry Szmidt' (T/A)', in which document is it?

Hi, sorry for the delayed reply. I had to shuffle through all the paperwork in order to find it. It’s in the letter of claim prior to county court claim. I have uploaded a screen shot. Does this help my defence in any way? Kind regards and appreciate your kind support. 

Metaphysicist

Here is the screenshot. 

Metaphysicist

I need to email this over by tomorrow as Wednesday is the deadline so any last minute help would be greatly appreciated. I will edit the defence and post it here one last time for approval. 

Thanks people! 

Umkomaas

Metaphysicist said:

Here is the screenshot. 

Would be better if that was showing on the actual county court claim form. Did you check that. 

As it stands, I don't think it provides a knock out punch, but you could mention in your WS that you are confused as to which entity is pursuing you because of what the LBC states. You say that you are bringing it to the attention of the Judge who may similarly be uncertain as to who the Claimant actually is, and does it point to other discrepancies in their submitted documents. 

Coupon-mad

Metaphysicist said:

Coupon-mad said:

All good (with the above tweaks) as long as the Claimant hasn't sent further and better Particulars/evidence after your successful CCJ set aside hearing, or provided they didn't already send a load of photos and evidence with a detailed witness statement before that hearing?

If they did, then you can't say you don't know from the POC what the claim is all about.

Remove this from 2, as it's already in para one:

" but liability is denied."

Hi, thanks for that! Claimant had a bunch of photos that they had with them in the hearing yes. So I take it I cannot deny liability?

That's not what I said.

I didn't say you couldn't deny liability and I wasn't talking about photos they had with them.

Please re-read what I advised.

Metaphysicist

Coupon-mad said:

Metaphysicist said:

Coupon-mad said:

All good (with the above tweaks) as long as the Claimant hasn't sent further and better Particulars/evidence after your successful CCJ set aside hearing, or provided they didn't already send a load of photos and evidence with a detailed witness statement before that hearing?

If they did, then you can't say you don't know from the POC what the claim is all about.

Remove this from 2, as it's already in para one:

" but liability is denied."

Hi, thanks for that! Claimant had a bunch of photos that they had with them in the hearing yes. So I take it I cannot deny liability?

That's not what I said.

I didn't say you couldn't deny liability and I wasn't talking about photos they had with them.

Please re-read what I advised.

Apologies for the mixup. Claimant sent me and the court in question their witness statement prior to the set aside hearing. I understand that means I am not able to deny from the POC what the claim is . 

Metaphysicist

Umkomaas said:

Metaphysicist said:

Here is the screenshot. 

Would be better if that was showing on the actual county court claim form. Did you check that. 

As it stands, I don't think it provides a knock out punch, but you could mention in your WS that you are confused as to which entity is pursuing you because of what the LBC states. You say that you are bringing it to the attention of the Judge who may similarly be uncertain as to who the Claimant actually is, and does it point to other discrepancies in their submitted documents. 

Unfortunately it’s not on any of the county court documents. I will add what you have mentioned on my defence. Thank you 

Coupon-mad

OK so you can't use the extra paras seen in the defence by Johny86 about the POC.  So just use the Template Defence itself, which doesn't include those.