We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Are we expecting BOE to remain at 4.75% on 8th February 2025?

Options
1135136138140141144

Comments

  • lojo1000 said:


    Actually, i should add i am not a financial advisor, i do not know your financial situation and therefore do not take my advice.
    Clearly. No financial advisor would be so readily conflating gold and bitcoin into the same risk category.
    Maybe you are a trader as opposed to investor?


    To solve inequality and failing productivity, cap leverage allowed to be used in property transactions. This lowers the ROI on housing, reduces monetary demand for housing, reduces house prices bringing them more into line with wage growth as opposed to debt expansion.

    Reduce stamp duty on new builds and increase stamp duty on pre-existing property.

    No-one should have control of setting interest rates since it only adds to uncertainty. Let the markets price yields, credit and labour.
  • lojo1000 said:

    I class Bitcoin ... as low risk

    i am not a financial advisor ... do not take my advice
    I can confidently say that few, if any, people here were at risk of doing that. :D

    Every generation blames the one before...
    Mike + The Mechanics - The Living Years
  • lojo1000 said:
    Why do you advocate a cut and also argue for stability?  Why not leave rates where they are now for stability?
    It aint just the man on the street borrows money, kinda affect businesses as well as paying back the national debt.   Couple this with employers NI Contributions, all the very best in the years ahead.   This will force start-ups into other jurisdications where these challenges are lesser.
  • RelievedSheff
    RelievedSheff Posts: 12,691 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Inflation up to 2.6%. It's hard to see any reason why rates should be lowered tomorrow!
  • lojo1000 said:
    Why do you advocate a cut and also argue for stability?  Why not leave rates where they are now for stability?
    It aint just the man on the street borrows money, kinda affect businesses as well as paying back the national debt.   Couple this with employers NI Contributions, all the very best in the years ahead.   This will force start-ups into other jurisdications where these challenges are lesser.
    Are you saying that you think they should cut rates to increase demand from consumers and business and make govt debt cheaper?

    And what level do you think rates should be and should they be held there or moved up and down?
    To solve inequality and failing productivity, cap leverage allowed to be used in property transactions. This lowers the ROI on housing, reduces monetary demand for housing, reduces house prices bringing them more into line with wage growth as opposed to debt expansion.

    Reduce stamp duty on new builds and increase stamp duty on pre-existing property.

    No-one should have control of setting interest rates since it only adds to uncertainty. Let the markets price yields, credit and labour.
  • Inflation up to 2.6%. It's hard to see any reason why rates should be lowered tomorrow!
    For sure the trend is down and MoM inflation is very low.

    Markets have 2 cuts priced in for 2025.

    The error the BoE is making is promising cuts when productivity is zero. Most of the new money will go into non-productive assets.

    At this stage no major govt is planning on giving money to working classes and hence general inflation will likely continue to fall whilst asset inflation increases. 

    So if they keep cutting, asset prices will continue to rise and make the country even less productive.



    To solve inequality and failing productivity, cap leverage allowed to be used in property transactions. This lowers the ROI on housing, reduces monetary demand for housing, reduces house prices bringing them more into line with wage growth as opposed to debt expansion.

    Reduce stamp duty on new builds and increase stamp duty on pre-existing property.

    No-one should have control of setting interest rates since it only adds to uncertainty. Let the markets price yields, credit and labour.
  • lojo1000 said:
    lojo1000 said:
    Why do you advocate a cut and also argue for stability?  Why not leave rates where they are now for stability?
    It aint just the man on the street borrows money, kinda affect businesses as well as paying back the national debt.   Couple this with employers NI Contributions, all the very best in the years ahead.   This will force start-ups into other jurisdications where these challenges are lesser.
    Are you saying that you think they should cut rates to increase demand from consumers and business and make govt debt cheaper?

    And what level do you think rates should be and should they be held there or moved up and down?
    3% / 3.25% - Done :)   Give people/businesses certainty and give growth a chance
  • lojo1000 said:
    I think they will hold rates in December.
    I think they will cut in anticipation of problems from U.S tariffs, but will be forced to raise again at some point next year, there is likely to be market volatility which will push mortgage rates up anyway in my opinion.
    Interesting, often the quick thought is that tariffs raise prices and hence are inflationary. But, of course, it could lead to job losses, lack of confidence and have a deflationary impact.

    We don't know what will happen and what decisions will be made by all the vested interests. 

    I think the global economy stagnates unless there is a strong infusion of debt from somewhere/everywhere. With yields rising in Japan, US and now across Europe, that does not seem likely.

    Not sure what Bailey, et al do in the meantime but I know it will have no material impact on the longer term. They should retire the MPC.
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/stock-market-today-dow-drops-1123-points-and-bond-yields-soar-as-markets-adjust-rate-outlook-after-fed-meeting/ar-AA1w74i6
  • lojo1000
    lojo1000 Posts: 288 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    lojo1000 said:
    lojo1000 said:
    Why do you advocate a cut and also argue for stability?  Why not leave rates where they are now for stability?
    It aint just the man on the street borrows money, kinda affect businesses as well as paying back the national debt.   Couple this with employers NI Contributions, all the very best in the years ahead.   This will force start-ups into other jurisdications where these challenges are lesser.
    Are you saying that you think they should cut rates to increase demand from consumers and business and make govt debt cheaper?

    And what level do you think rates should be and should they be held there or moved up and down?
    3% / 3.25% - Done :)   Give people/businesses certainty and give growth a chance
    Why not 2% and done?
    To solve inequality and failing productivity, cap leverage allowed to be used in property transactions. This lowers the ROI on housing, reduces monetary demand for housing, reduces house prices bringing them more into line with wage growth as opposed to debt expansion.

    Reduce stamp duty on new builds and increase stamp duty on pre-existing property.

    No-one should have control of setting interest rates since it only adds to uncertainty. Let the markets price yields, credit and labour.
  • lojo1000
    lojo1000 Posts: 288 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    lojo1000 said:
    I think they will hold rates in December.
    I think they will cut in anticipation of problems from U.S tariffs, but will be forced to raise again at some point next year, there is likely to be market volatility which will push mortgage rates up anyway in my opinion.
    Interesting, often the quick thought is that tariffs raise prices and hence are inflationary. But, of course, it could lead to job losses, lack of confidence and have a deflationary impact.

    We don't know what will happen and what decisions will be made by all the vested interests. 

    I think the global economy stagnates unless there is a strong infusion of debt from somewhere/everywhere. With yields rising in Japan, US and now across Europe, that does not seem likely.

    Not sure what Bailey, et al do in the meantime but I know it will have no material impact on the longer term. They should retire the MPC.
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/stock-market-today-dow-drops-1123-points-and-bond-yields-soar-as-markets-adjust-rate-outlook-after-fed-meeting/ar-AA1w74i6
    So the Fed cut 25bps as expected but gave a hawkish statement - unexpected - and cut their forecast of future cuts from 100bps to 50bps in 2025.

    I expect the BoE will follow with similar rhetoric though UK has considerable growth concerns making the situation in the UK more dire.

    As i've been banging on about for a long time now, cutting rates with record low unemployment just creates speculative demand - CBs may now be admitting this. Just look at the positive real wage growth to see there is not enough labour slack to cut rates.

    I think the Fed is now seeing this clear enough they can no longer ignore it.

    This change in the path by the Fed however will add to the deflationary factors.

    "If the Fed is no longer going to support the speculative asset bubble then risk has just increased......cut risk".

    Subject to what the Trump govt does, I expect growth to begin to fall in 2025. Trump will try and cut taxes whilst promoting his cost cutting (DOGE) agenda. I see the deficit continuing to rise and yields also rising due to concerns over the deficit meaning further contraction.

    In 2025 the Fed will need to increase the easing path again as growth and inflation slows. But the same result will occur (unless they wait for unemployment to get over 6-7%) and asset prices will rise even faster as markets know the Fed will need to cut even faster now - and potentially go back to QE.
    To solve inequality and failing productivity, cap leverage allowed to be used in property transactions. This lowers the ROI on housing, reduces monetary demand for housing, reduces house prices bringing them more into line with wage growth as opposed to debt expansion.

    Reduce stamp duty on new builds and increase stamp duty on pre-existing property.

    No-one should have control of setting interest rates since it only adds to uncertainty. Let the markets price yields, credit and labour.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.