We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
UKPC / DCB Legal - vehicle owner/ driver left site
Comments
-
If you are admitting to being the driver, why do you think you need to reference PoFA? You only need the PoFA reference if the driver's identity is unknown.furac40 said:
Par #2 and #4 say different things. One admits the driver is the keeper and the other references the PoFA.3 -
Just wondering in view of paras re POC not being clear if the following should be deletd from para 3?:-".........who remained on site throughout their visit."3
-
Thank you for your help, anything else to consider before submitting the defence please.
0 -
I think it's OK. The OP has to say something in para 3 and we all know the case will be discontinued later anyway!1505grandad said:Just wondering in view of paras re POC not being clear if the following should be deletd from para 3?:-".........who remained on site throughout their visit."PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD3 -
That is not the (correct) template defence. If you use the correct template you will see that liability is denied in paragraph #1 so you don't need it again in paragraph #2. Paragraph 4# cannot apply as you have admitted being the driver and the PPC do not need to "transfer liability to the keeper" as they have addressed the claim to the keeper/driver.3
-
Just received a letter from DCBL stating that they intend to proceed with the claim.The recommended action on other threads was to await MCOL to update that CCBC sent the DQ, download N180 from the internet and submit it to Court and Claimant. Are you still endorsing this action?Can you recommend a few related WS so I can work ahead.0
-
Await your N180 from the CCBC - it won't be instant - maybe 3-4 weeks. Check your MCOL history from time to time to check its dispatch to you.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street2 -
furac40 said:Just received a letter from DCBL stating that they intend to proceed with the claim.The recommended action on other threads was to await MCOL to update that CCBC sent the DQ, download N180 from the internet and submit it to Court and Claimant. Are you still endorsing this action?Can you recommend a few related WS so I can work ahead.
What does your MCOL status page show? There are two recommended WSs currently but do check that they suit your particular circumstances and do not just blindly copy them; remember the WS is in support of and provides evidence for YOUR defence.
1 -
Can you please have a look at my draft WS and let me know your tghouth.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards