We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Mortgage Valuation Loft Conversion - Vent/Panic!
Comments
-
1. Correct paperwork is located, valuation completed and we can move forward.
2. Nothing is located and therefore the seller needs to sort either a change in the lease or regularisation of the planning or accept a greatly reduced offer for a 1 bed house (i think?)
Just to emphasise - this isn't an either/or choice.
The lease needs to show that the 2nd floor is owned by the seller.
Planning Consent won't override the lease. (And if the conversion was done over 4 years ago, Planning Consent isn't an issue.)
If the 2nd floor isn't owned by the seller, it's probably owned jointly by all the joint freeholders. So the seller will need to persuade them all to sell/transfer it to the seller (or to you).
All the joint freeholders will probably have to agree to the sale/transfer. They might all agree very easily, they might refuse to sell it, they might ask for a stupidly high price, they might be disinterested and refuse to sign the documents. They might want to ask their solicitors advice about it (and expect the seller to pay their solicitor's bill).
So it might get resolved in days, or it might take months, or it might never happen.
3 -
That's not likely to be relevant - solicitors are going to do the same amount of due diligence no matter where the money is coming from. It's entirely possible that there is in fact nothing wrong and the surveyor is ringing alarm bells unnecessarily, based on their lay interpretation of incomplete paperwork.however he was a cash buyer, so possibly it never came up?2 -
Surely that’s the point- incomplete paperwork. But it’s up to the seller to get complete paperwork, not the OP.user1977 said:
That's not likely to be relevant - solicitors are going to do the same amount of due diligence no matter where the money is coming from. It's entirely possible that there is in fact nothing wrong and the surveyor is ringing alarm bells unnecessarily, based on their lay interpretation of incomplete paperwork.however he was a cash buyer, so possibly it never came up?
No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
My point was more that the paperwork may in fact all be complete, but the surveyor appears to have only looked at the Lease. And not, say, the variation which means the loft is already included.GDB2222 said:
Surely that’s the point- incomplete paperwork. But it’s up to the seller to get complete paperwork, not the OP.user1977 said:
That's not likely to be relevant - solicitors are going to do the same amount of due diligence no matter where the money is coming from. It's entirely possible that there is in fact nothing wrong and the surveyor is ringing alarm bells unnecessarily, based on their lay interpretation of incomplete paperwork.however he was a cash buyer, so possibly it never came up?2 -
user1977 said:
My point was more that the paperwork may in fact all be complete, but the surveyor appears to have only looked at the Lease. And not, say, the variation which means the loft is already included.GDB2222 said:
Surely that’s the point- incomplete paperwork. But it’s up to the seller to get complete paperwork, not the OP.user1977 said:
That's not likely to be relevant - solicitors are going to do the same amount of due diligence no matter where the money is coming from. It's entirely possible that there is in fact nothing wrong and the surveyor is ringing alarm bells unnecessarily, based on their lay interpretation of incomplete paperwork.however he was a cash buyer, so possibly it never came up?
That’s possible, of course, but there’s no indication from the OP that there is a variation.user1977 said:
My point was more that the paperwork may in fact all be complete, but the surveyor appears to have only looked at the Lease. And not, say, the variation which means the loft is already included.GDB2222 said:
Surely that’s the point- incomplete paperwork. But it’s up to the seller to get complete paperwork, not the OP.user1977 said:
That's not likely to be relevant - solicitors are going to do the same amount of due diligence no matter where the money is coming from. It's entirely possible that there is in fact nothing wrong and the surveyor is ringing alarm bells unnecessarily, based on their lay interpretation of incomplete paperwork.however he was a cash buyer, so possibly it never came up?No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
It’s just possible that the seller knows that the title is defective, which is why it was sold last time to a cash buyer, probably at a discounted price. If so, just make sure you don’t pay full price now.

No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
I’ve replied twice and it’s not posting how strange. Yes 10k under asking price, considering the offer it was a good deal, which makes me think it wasn’t the dodgy carpets and proximity to a main road that was driving it…GDB2222 said:It’s just possible that the seller knows that the title is defective, which is why it was sold last time to a cash buyer, probably at a discounted price. If so, just make sure you don’t pay full price now.
1 -
Any reason why they haven't bothered to put the title right before selling?GDB2222 said:It’s just possible that the seller knows that the title is defective, which is why it was sold last time to a cash buyer, probably at a discounted price. If so, just make sure you don’t pay full price now.
1 -
Purely speculative, but maybe they don’t want to alert the other owners of the freehold to the problem? The cost of buying the right to use the loft space could be a large percentage of the value of the property (say 25-50%), and maybe they are hoping to find a buyer who will take a chance.Emily_Joy said:
Any reason why they haven't bothered to put the title right before selling?GDB2222 said:It’s just possible that the seller knows that the title is defective, which is why it was sold last time to a cash buyer, probably at a discounted price. If so, just make sure you don’t pay full price now.
Or, they have raised this with the other freeholders and the cost of sorting it out is very high.Or as @use@user1977 says, it could all be a mistake by the surveyor, and the paperwork could be hunky dory.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

