We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Amazon Direct, Section 75
Comments
-
What what do you think S75 gives you, compared to say chargebacks?PRDMKT said:
Amazon is £56 cheaper than apple direct. I am not worried rather skeptical and like to have the protection just in case.born_again said:If you want real protection buy direct from Apple. Avoiding any protentional issues.
Why exactly are you citing S75 & exactly what are you worried about.
Thanks for your response but it doesn't really answer my question
S75 is not a cover all insurance policy.
For £56 I would go to a Apple store & buy one in person, for the fact you can walk away from a store with one. Sometimes saving a few quid is not always worth when things go wrong.Life in the slow lane0 -
S75 would still apply to transactions on the sister Amazon websites like Amazon US.DullGreyGuy said:
Assuming its from Amazon UK... if it was Amazon US, Amazon EU etc then technically you'd have the same problem though if a bank spotted it may be more 50/50PRDMKT said:
But this isn't a marketplace purchase, it's direct from Amazon, so presumably the s75 applies?HillStreetBlues said:
I know it's a typo (should be no) but does change the meaning for anyone reading.DullGreyGuy said:There isnt a grey area with Marketplace purchases, its straightforward that you have a middleman in the equation and so S75 protection.
S75 however just replicates your rights to your bank... useful for overseas transactions where dealing with a foreign legal system is difficult or if a company goes bust or to ground but not sure what significant benefit you'd get with it -v- dealing with a large multinational like Amazon. S75 doesnt give you any additional rights.0 -
Not sister websites... buying on Amazon.co.uk but the merchant being Amazon US eg https://www.amazon.co.uk/ROSLE-Cooking-Utensils-stainless-Silver/dp/B0002F7O9S/Deleted_User said:
S75 would still apply to transactions on the sister Amazon websites like Amazon US.DullGreyGuy said:
Assuming its from Amazon UK... if it was Amazon US, Amazon EU etc then technically you'd have the same problem though if a bank spotted it may be more 50/50PRDMKT said:
But this isn't a marketplace purchase, it's direct from Amazon, so presumably the s75 applies?HillStreetBlues said:
I know it's a typo (should be no) but does change the meaning for anyone reading.DullGreyGuy said:There isnt a grey area with Marketplace purchases, its straightforward that you have a middleman in the equation and so S75 protection.
S75 however just replicates your rights to your bank... useful for overseas transactions where dealing with a foreign legal system is difficult or if a company goes bust or to ground but not sure what significant benefit you'd get with it -v- dealing with a large multinational like Amazon. S75 doesnt give you any additional rights.
You would technically be paying the UK entity but the supplier would be the US entity and whilst they are part of the same Group they are not the same entity and so technically would mean an extra entity is involved than the 3 required by S750 -
I like to have a nuclear option always and knowing that the bank is ultimately joint liable is certainly a calming factor.born_again said:
What what do you think S75 gives you, compared to say chargebacks?PRDMKT said:
Amazon is £56 cheaper than apple direct. I am not worried rather skeptical and like to have the protection just in case.born_again said:If you want real protection buy direct from Apple. Avoiding any protentional issues.
Why exactly are you citing S75 & exactly what are you worried about.
Thanks for your response but it doesn't really answer my question
S75 is not a cover all insurance policy.
For £56 I would go to a Apple store & buy one in person, for the fact you can walk away from a store with one. Sometimes saving a few quid is not always worth when things go wrong.0 -
How's it a nuclear option? Banks pay the money from their own pocket and defend claims fairly robustlyPRDMKT said:
I like to have a nuclear option always and knowing that the bank is ultimately joint liable is certainly a calming factor.born_again said:
What what do you think S75 gives you, compared to say chargebacks?PRDMKT said:
Amazon is £56 cheaper than apple direct. I am not worried rather skeptical and like to have the protection just in case.born_again said:If you want real protection buy direct from Apple. Avoiding any protentional issues.
Why exactly are you citing S75 & exactly what are you worried about.
Thanks for your response but it doesn't really answer my question
S75 is not a cover all insurance policy.
For £56 I would go to a Apple store & buy one in person, for the fact you can walk away from a store with one. Sometimes saving a few quid is not always worth when things go wrong.1 -
DullGreyGuy said:

You would technically be paying the UK entity but the supplier would be the US entity and whilst they are part of the same Group they are not the same entity and so technically would mean an extra entity is involved than the 3 required by S75
It does depend on what happens when you check out
In this case you would get S75 protection as Amazon Export Sales LLC is who takes payment, (that name will appear on the CC) and is the supplier.
Let's Be Careful Out There0 -
Not paying £100 for a set of bowls to find out but in previous transactions with Amazon.co.uk the payment has been to Amazon UK when the seller has been Amazon EU (can't recall buying from Amazon US)HillStreetBlues said:DullGreyGuy said:
You would technically be paying the UK entity but the supplier would be the US entity and whilst they are part of the same Group they are not the same entity and so technically would mean an extra entity is involved than the 3 required by S75
It does depend on what happens when you check out
In this case you would get S75 protection as Amazon Export Sales LLC is who takes payment, (that name will appear on the CC) and is the supplier.0 -
I agree with thatDullGreyGuy said:Not paying £100 for a set of bowls to find out
Let's Be Careful Out There0 -
Are you sure it is supplied by Amazon?I just went onto Amazon.co.uk and in the search box typed Appie iphone 14 pro max 1tbSome results came back. I chose one of the phones.Whilst the pages doesn't specifically say supplied by Amazon, it does have a hyperlink titled: "Visit the apple store".Also the price is exactly the same as if you went straignt to the UK apple store.My guess is that the UK apple store are advertising on Amazon. But I could be wrong.0
-
It shows as out of stock on the first link, hence no supplierlr1277 said:Whilst the pages doesn't specifically say supplied by Amazon, it does have a hyperlink titled: "Visit the apple store".Also the price is exactly the same as if you went straignt to the UK apple store.My guess is that the UK apple store are advertising on Amazon. But I could be wrong.
If you go to the second link, which is cheaper, it shows the supplier is Amazon
The "Apple Store" is Amazon's Apple Store. If you search for any big brand on Amazon you will get a link to the XXX Store under the item name; if its a smaller brand it simply has brand:XXX instead1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
