We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Bad situation - need to divorce/unwell unable to work
Options
Comments
-
beckyben89 said:tightauldgit said:Your rights are that should you divorce you would be entitled to a fair share of the marital assets - probably 50% as a starting point. If you are divorcing solely to get quick access to funds then bear in mind that it may take some time to go through the courts and get a financial settlement. You may be able to make a settlement offer to your husband for less than you would otherwise be entitled to in exchange for a quick settlement.
You won't be able to sell the house without your husband agreeing to the sale presuming he's on the deeds.
I am sure he will agree to sell house. I am willing to wait a year for it to sell. I wouldn't settle for less than 50%. I cannot work again in my condition, where he can.
It seems you may have posted some other threads with more background on this which I'm unaware of. Is your inability to work due to the condition a medical diagnosis or a decision you have made yourself as I think that a medical diagnosis saying you are unable to work would help in a claim for spousal maintenance.
As others have asked, where would you expect to live after the house is sold?0 -
wilfred30 said:If you sell the house, where will you live?
1 -
OP you have to look at it from all angles logically.
Be calm and don't rush into things as divorce, selling assets etc all take time.
Also on the forum, you posted, and people are giving you suggestions trying to assist, take what is helpful and leave the rest no need to get upset/angry.1 -
A finacial settlement is based on splitting assets (all assets, not just those in joint names, so would includeanything such as pensions either of you have in your sole names) in a way which is fair taking into accountall circumsntaces. This includes your repective finacial needs and your respective incomes and earning capacities.
SO if you have disabilities which mean you can no longer work, or have limited earning cacity, and/or that your disability may mean you require a particualr type of property or an adapted property, those are things which might mean it was fair for you to have more than 50%. Factors such as your respective ages and how long you were married / together for will also be relavant.All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards