Court case won v KBT Cornwall trading as Armtrac Security Services and represented by bwlegal

Umkomaas

Great result. Red meat for the forum regulars! 🥩 

Le_Kirk

Frappy5 said:

 I was also awarded total costs of £387.50.
A shout out to !!!!!! and bwlegal for their totally unreasonable behaviour throughout. They are both morally bankrupt. 

If they keep that up, they will be financially bankrupt as well.  Brilliant news, well done to you!

95Rollers

Umkomaas said:

Great result. Red meat for the forum regulars! 🥩 

You mean the same forum regulars who BW are slagging off on their website as "non-qualified armchair lawyers" who apparently dish out poor advice in Roh*n K's desperate gaslighting propaganda on BWs website !?  What sort of Dogs**t firm does he run when his qualified experts and clients are repeatedly being spanked these amateurs!? They might as well give back their degrees!

The bulk of the money his firm collects is through aggressive, intimidating, gaslighting and threatening letters which the government will hopefully be banning soon!  He and his colleagues are an embarrassment to the legal industry!!

Well done on a great result and getting a great judge. I bet BW won't be putting this in their news section. 

Make sure you leave BW ( https://www.trustpilot.com/review/bwlegal.co.uk ) + Armtrac ( https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.armtracservices.co.uk )  reviews on Google and Trustpilot mentioning the site name as this will help others as it will come up high in search engine results. 

Well done  👏  Justice ⚖ 

patient_dream

95Rollers said:

Umkomaas said:

Great result. Red meat for the forum regulars! 🥩 

I bet BW won't be putting this in their news section. 

Doubt it but does not matter really, all MSE threads go onto google so everybody can see the spankings of BWLegal and all the other daft legals

Frappy5

Castle said:

Frappy5 said:

Today I won my dispute with bwlegal (representing KBT Cornwall t/as Armtrac Security Services - !!!!!!) where I was taken to court for the non-display of a car parking ticket in August 2020 at Swanpool car park, Falmouth in Cornwall. The case was decided at a telephone hearing this morning hosted by the County Court at Worcester. I made 5 points in my defence - the judge never got past my first point before deciding against the claimant and striking out the case. Not only was 'unreasonable behaviour' cited against bwlegal (they never turned up and were represented by an adjudicator), but I I was also awarded total costs of £387.50.
A shout out to !!!!!! and bwlegal for their totally unreasonable behaviour throughout. They are both morally bankrupt. 

What was/is an adjudicator and are they even allowed to participate in court proceedings?

bwlegal didn't turn up at the telephone hearing, they must have paid someone who was introduced as an 'adjudicator' to represent them. The judge asked them early on if they had the power to act on behalf of the client. 

KeithP

Or was he perhaps introduced as an advocate?

Frappy5

Frappy5, could you divulge details of the curcumstances as I am currently awaiting adjudication by the IAS for a "non-display" situation last month at Swanpool - I used JustPark & the app messed up the (correctly entered) VRM - although I had paid the tariff & Armtrac's own "evidence" proves that I paid! Any info much appreciated, cheers!

I purchased a ticket and it fell off the windscreen. Photographic evidence I took proved I had displayed the ticket, but it fell face down. The judge ruled that it was not in dispute that I purchased a ticket, and I had evidence that it was displayed and asked why would KBT Cornwall t/as Armtrac Security Services and bwlegal pursue this. It sounds like you have a similar situation albeit digitally. If Armtrac's 'evidence' in your case supports the fact you paid, it is clear to any reasonable person that it would not be in the public interest to penalise a person who paid the required fee, has evidence of doing so and has done nothing to the detriment of public interest.   

Frappy5

KeithP said:

Or was he perhaps introduced as an advocate?

Possibly - I was pretty nervous at the start so probably didn't register...

Coupon-mad

Yep, roboclaim firms hire a legal gun - an advocate. Well done!

patient_dream

Well done .... the "rent by the hour" legal did not turn up, what a laugh

By the way you said .. "The judge asked them early on if they had the power to act on behalf of the client."  who was he talking to ?

Just another day in the office of a robo claimer.... BWLegal.
They failed their client Armtrac Security Services ?  GOOD ?

Another thread which can be seen on google search   

These legals seem to have no idea the damage they do to themselves by getting involved in the great parking scam for monopoly money