We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
QDR parking fine.
Comments
-
Your comments (see 3rd post of the Newbies thread) will reiterate that the NTK is not a POFA one and the driver has never been identified, so the PCN is not enforceable against the appellant, who is only the registered keeper.
Then add that Elite Parking Ltd are not the landowner, just another 3rd party PPC.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
Thank you. They do say on their evidence "Please be advised, this Parking Charge was not issued under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012."Coupon-mad said:Your comments (see 3rd post of the Newbies thread) will reiterate that the NTK is not a POFA one and the driver has never been identified, so the PCN is not enforceable against the appellant, who is only the registered keeper.
Then add that Elite Parking Ltd are not the landowner, just another 3rd party PPC.
0 -
Does Fairlie v Fenton (1870) LR 5 Exch 169 have any merit in this? Should I mention this or just speak about said points on previous post0
-
No, they're having a laugh!Tsm96 said:Does Fairlie v Fenton (1870) LR 5 Exch 169 have any merit in this? Should I mention this or just speak about said points on previous postPRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD2 -
Thank you0
-
Won at popla. They failed to provide a picture of the original PCN to popla4
-
Hilarious incompetence!PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
Yep. Ridiculous really!0
-
Well doneTsm96 said:Won at popla. They failed to provide a picture of the original PCN to popla
Just another daft company the BPA approve1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards