We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PIP appeal
Comments
-
Citizens advice will not help with this stage, which i advised on your other thread. https://advicelocal.uk/Why are you continuing to mix both PIP and LCW/LCWRA together. They are different benefits with different criteria.For the moving around part of mobility PIP they look at your ability to stand and walk. For LCWRA it's mobilising, which includes your ability to use a self propel wheelchair, this isn't considered with PIP.
2 -
Read the statement and they've basically repeated what the assessment said and seem to think I go to the Trafford Centre all the time so can walk around and be around people! I can't remember saying this and there was covid in 2020/2021. I've not been to the Trafford Centre for at least 4 years.
They say I can drive fine and if I had gout I wouldn't be able to. I've said in the form, the tribunal evidence and at the hearing that I drive only when I can and that with gout or eye flare up I do not drive.
They've said "We preferred the evidence of the HCP as it was more consistent". I've said that the report was full of lies and said I can do things which I didn't even mention. And everything it said I can do was during the good days, none of it said I can't do an activity because of my medical conditions.
I don't say i'm affected all the time but combined they are over 50%.
Though WCA and PIP have different criteria, a week earlier the WCA tribunal gave me 6 points for being able to walk up to 200 metres whereas this PIP tribunal gave 0 points for being able to walk over 200 metres. Same evidence. I can either walk under/over 200 metres or not. The PIP form was part of the DWPs WCA evidence and the tribunal asked many questions from it.0 -
Citizens advice will not help with this stage, which i advised on your other thread. https://advicelocal.uk/0
-
tifo said:
Though WCA and PIP have different criteria, a week earlier the WCA tribunal gave me 6 points for being able to walk up to 200 metres whereas this PIP tribunal gave 0 points for being able to walk over 200 metres. Same evidence. I can either walk under/over 200 metres or not. The PIP form was part of the DWPs WCA evidence and the tribunal asked many questions from it.I don't think it matters either way because even if you had scored points in the moving around part it would have only been 4 points, which wouldn't have been enough for a mobility award.I'm sorry but in my opinion you concentrated on the wrong things for each Tribunal and mixed up to the benefits, which didn't help you.1 -
tifo said:
Though WCA and PIP have different criteria, a week earlier the WCA tribunal gave me 6 points for being able to walk up to 200 metres whereas this PIP tribunal gave 0 points for being able to walk over 200 metres. Same evidence. I can either walk under/over 200 metres or not. The PIP form was part of the DWPs WCA evidence and the tribunal asked many questions from it.
It doesn’t matter about the combination, its the individual conditions do you have gout the majority of the time? Does you eye condition stop you from walking?I don't say i'm affected all the time but combined they are over 50%.
Sadly these are the things they look at, if they can discredit the activity more than they can support a scoring descriptor, then its zero points.
Proud to have dealt with our debtsStarting debt 2005 £65.7K.
Current debt ZERO.DEBT FREE1 -
peteuk said:tifo said:
Though WCA and PIP have different criteria, a week earlier the WCA tribunal gave me 6 points for being able to walk up to 200 metres whereas this PIP tribunal gave 0 points for being able to walk over 200 metres. Same evidence. I can either walk under/over 200 metres or not. The PIP form was part of the DWPs WCA evidence and the tribunal asked many questions from it.
It doesn’t matter about the combination, its the individual conditions do you have gout the majority of the time? Does you eye condition stop you from walking?I don't say i'm affected all the time but combined they are over 50%.
Sadly these are the things they look at, if they can discredit the activity more than they can support a scoring descriptor, then its zero points.
The eye conditions don't stop me walking but they do affect my daily activities.0 -
What i've got here is a tribunal panel that's quoted the medical report, which itself did not follow guidelines such as considering bad days also, or looking at my evidence submitted or even getting medical records from my GP, it only talks about what I can do on the good days and there's assumptions about walking. It only looked at my PIP form and says so. I've detailed it in this thread.
The text in the statement of reasons which says I can do this and that is all taken from the medical report which is about the good days. If my conditions affect me, say, 51% of the time then 49% of the time i'm ok. The medical report and thus the statement of reasons concentrated on the 49%.
The statement of reasons clearly says they believe the HCP and not me and at the hearing the judge said she doesn't trust my evidence even though it was hospital letters, GP fitnotes, information about my conditions and when from, and lots of photos of when my conditions were affecting me so they can see what happened. Therefore I think I didn't get a fair hearing. None of my evidence or statements make things up, i clearly explained my conditions and how they affect my daily living and provided evidence.0 -
poppy12345 said:I'm sorry but in my opinion you concentrated on the wrong things for each Tribunal and mixed up to the benefits, which didn't help you.0
-
tifo said:What i've got here is a tribunal panel that's quoted the medical report, which itself did not follow guidelines such as considering bad days also, or looking at my evidence submitted or even getting medical records from my GP…
That they took the HCP report into account in preference to your evidence might be an error in law which could possibly be challenged.Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.0 -
Have you identified a material error in law in the FT Tribunal's statement of reasons ?
Alice Holt Forest situated some 4 miles south of Farnham forms the most northerly gateway to the South Downs National Park.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards