We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Does a converted outbuilding need an EPC, planning permission etc?
Options
Comments
-
Hi, in both your cases the LL is claiming that the occupier is a lodger not a tenant, albeit both are living in nexes separate from the house.
Deposits from lodgers do not need registering with any scheme, at least in England.
So you proactively need to write to the LL and ask for the deposit back within a timeframe you decide. If they don't act, send a letter before action.If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing1 -
It's true that the LL is treating the occupier as a tenant and acting as if this is the case, but it seems to be for their own benefit. In my own case, I have been treated as a lodger because it is more beneficial/ easy for the LL to do so as opposed to this actually being the reality. I agree that writing a letter would be a good first step, and you are armed with the information from Citizen's Advice if it needs to go further. Might even be worth giving them, and Shelter, a call for clarification.0
-
Just a quick update on this. The deposit was eventually returned in full after an email to the LL and the tenant has now moved out.As for the flat itself, the university refused to look into it. Instead they relisted it on their website and have allegedly let it to another student. It seems the council weren't interested either despite an email to say the address for CT purposes was not the same as the main house. Not much else can be done without expending unecessary energy, I think.Thank you again to everyone who has given advice. It was helpful to have some more experienced opinions to pass on, especially on the technical bits. Glad to have this saga over. All the best
2 -
no_moolah said: As for the flat itself, the university refused to look into it. Instead they relisted it on their website and have allegedly let it to another student.
What does the Student Union have to say about it ?
Her courage will change the world.
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.1 -
FreeBear said:no_moolah said: As for the flat itself, the university refused to look into it. Instead they relisted it on their website and have allegedly let it to another student.
What does the Student Union have to say about it ?
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards