We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Unfair Dismissal medical reasons
Comments
-
They need at least to believe you are going to go to court in order to settle. A letter that bad that is clearly lying about having consulted a legal firm will not convince them of that.danjackson2021 said:
I think all that is true of the big company they don’t want all that which is why they prefer to settleSadieO said:
I'm not sure that's true. You might have zero money, but if you get into debt you have less than zero! And there's more to lose than just money. Fighting a difficult battle uses up your time, gives you stress etc. You might think they have "nothing to lose" but their quality of life could get a lot worse.danjackson2021 said:when someone has nothing they have nothing to lose😁0 -
Op have you obtained any accountable advice on this matter - yes or no?
0 -
I worked for a pretty big organisation and we very rarely settled and if we did it was because we had an unwinnable case (only happened once in a 16+ year career in HR). We took the view that if we got a reputation for settling it would increase the number of ‘chancers’ lodging claims against us. We’d rather spend £1000s on solicitors and barristers - plus we’d put cost orders against those with weak cases. So don’t make assumptions about ‘big companies’ and their appetite for a legal fight.danjackson2021 said:
I think all that is true of the big company they don’t want all that which is why they prefer to settleSadieO said:
I'm not sure that's true. You might have zero money, but if you get into debt you have less than zero! And there's more to lose than just money. Fighting a difficult battle uses up your time, gives you stress etc. You might think they have "nothing to lose" but their quality of life could get a lot worse.danjackson2021 said:when someone has nothing they have nothing to lose😁9 -
Also, I imagine the stress/time/money aspect would affect an individual significantly more than a big company. especially if they are big enough to have a legal department/person in house. They will just do this as part of their day to day job without any personal costs.polgara said:
I worked for a pretty big organisation and we very rarely settled and if we did it was because we had an unwinnable case (only happened once in a 16+ year career in HR). We took the view that if we got a reputation for settling it would increase the number of ‘chancers’ lodging claims against us. We’d rather spend £1000s on solicitors and barristers - plus we’d put cost orders against those with weak cases. So don’t make assumptions about ‘big companies’ and their appetite for a legal fight.danjackson2021 said:
I think all that is true of the big company they don’t want all that which is why they prefer to settleSadieO said:
I'm not sure that's true. You might have zero money, but if you get into debt you have less than zero! And there's more to lose than just money. Fighting a difficult battle uses up your time, gives you stress etc. You might think they have "nothing to lose" but their quality of life could get a lot worse.danjackson2021 said:when someone has nothing they have nothing to lose😁2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards