We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
UC by 2024
Comments
-
The savings over £16k are disregarded for a year.atlantis187 said:If someone has savings over 16k at the point of migration from tax credits will they get transitional protection and how long will this last for if no other changes get made to the UC claim for several years after?0 -
As Andrew says, Capital over £16,000 will be ignored for 12 months. Transitional protection will apply to the calculation of the UC amount at the point of transfer. If there is still more than £16,000 after 12 months UC entitlement will end.atlantis187 said:If someone has savings over 16k at the point of migration from tax credits will they get transitional protection and how long will this last for if no other changes get made to the UC claim for several years after?Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.0 -
@andrewmp was suggesting exactly that,..calcotti said:No one has suggested that the process is as indicated inn your opening paragraph.
Again, my reply was towards @andrewmp rather than yourselfcalcotti said:
I have made no indication of how many students might be involved. Bearing in mind that new Tax Credit claims have not been possible (except in limited circumstances) for over three years I agree with you that the numbers are likely to be small.
As to events that would end transitional protection, I was looking specifically at those for whom, without specific disregards giving transitional protection, on migration day would not qualify for UC at all.
The savings disregard is quite detailed about how it would last for a maximum twelve months and what could cause it to end sooner.
The paragraph about students has no detail on when it will end but it's quite specific on when it applies. The condition that would otherwise cause benefits to terminate for someone in full time education is not to apply while they are continuing to undertake that course.
The important part being "while they continue to undertake that course" I would interpret that as once they are no longer taking that course the condition would apply.
I of course could be completely wrong
0 -
The condition that would normally disqualify them (assuming they are not responsible for one or more children nor have LCW) would be that they are receiving education. Once they are no longer undertaking the course - no longer receiving education - then they no longer need the protection of that exclusion being waived, it's irrelevant to them.kaMelo said:
@andrewmp was suggesting exactly that,..calcotti said:No one has suggested that the process is as indicated inn your opening paragraph.
Again, my reply was towards @andrewmp rather than yourselfcalcotti said:
I have made no indication of how many students might be involved. Bearing in mind that new Tax Credit claims have not been possible (except in limited circumstances) for over three years I agree with you that the numbers are likely to be small.
As to events that would end transitional protection, I was looking specifically at those for whom, without specific disregards giving transitional protection, on migration day would not qualify for UC at all.
The savings disregard is quite detailed about how it would last for a maximum twelve months and what could cause it to end sooner.
The paragraph about students has no detail on when it will end but it's quite specific on when it applies. The condition that would otherwise cause benefits to terminate for someone in full time education is not to apply while they are continuing to undertake that course.
The important part being "while they continue to undertake that course" I would interpret that as once they are no longer taking that course the condition would apply.
I of course could be completely wrong
Protection in other areas that might also apply to the same claimant, e.g. benefits amounts and savings disregards, should surely still stand on their own merit and continue as appropriate.0 -
The student rule means that instead of being disqualified from claiming UC the student is a qualifying person for the purpose of claiming UC.kaMelo said: ..As to events that would end transitional protection, I was looking specifically at those for whom, without specific disregards giving transitional protection, on migration day would not qualify for UC at all...
The paragraph about students has no detail on when it will end but it's quite specific on when it applies. The condition that would otherwise cause benefits to terminate for someone in full time education is not to apply while they are continuing to undertake that course.
The important part being "while they continue to undertake that course" I would interpret that as once they are no longer taking that course the condition would apply.
I of course could be completely wrong
Regulation 60 only deals with the student status and limits the qualifying purpose to completion of that course (which would exclude people who go straight on to study a further course immediately after the first).
The rules around the application of the transitional element are separate. I think you are incorrect to interpret regulations 60 as covering the transitional protection.Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.1 -
It's going to stop some graduates from going into teaching too, which is a shame when there is a teacher shortage.0
-
andrewmp said:It's going to stop some graduates from going into teaching too, which is a shame when there is a teacher shortage.School Direct (salaried) is an employment-based route for high quality graduates, typically with at least three years’ experience of transferable work history.
0 -
Hardly anyone does a salaried route.OhWow said:andrewmp said:It's going to stop some graduates from going into teaching too, which is a shame when there is a teacher shortage.School Direct (salaried) is an employment-based route for high quality graduates, typically with at least three years’ experience of transferable work history.0 -
Any news on how the migration is going?0
-
Some migration notices to start the process have been issued in the two trial areas of Medway and Bolton.Pdman said:Any news on how the migration is going?
LA Welfare Direct 6/2022 - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards