We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Turned down for expenses on a non-refundable hotel stay after Easyjet flights cancelled
Options
Comments
-
lisyloo said:Flipjango said:Caz3121 said:Flipjango said:Why should this be the insurance company's responsibility,
There is still lots of uncertainty in travel industry. I have future bookings but I am still choosing to pay the extra for refundable rates for accommodation and booking packages when previously I would have done diy.
so you need good insurance.
were there no other flights from any other airports available?Last time it happened to me I travelled from a different airport at a different time and charged all the extras (accom, increase in flights, parking, travel) to the insurance.
It inconvenient and we had to pay excess x 2 but that was better than missing a wedding.0 -
I sympathise but what is relevant is what the law and your contract says not what you feel morally entitled to.
I completely get your arguments and agree with them but they are not the same as what you are entitled to.
Short notice may have been an issue, but it’s worth noting for the future that your insurer may expect you to mitigate losses.
I found 5 flights from London and 4 from Birmingham on a single day and that’s without looking any further afield.
if I decided not to go I’d want evidence that I’d attempted to mitigate my losses e.g. checked all the possible flights.
my insurer was great and accepted the arrangements we chose and paid all the costs, but cheap/bad insurers will expect you to do what’s cheapest and not necessarily what you prefer or are concerned about. My personal experience would lead me to recommend getting a good insurer because they’ll be much more reasonable about that kind of thing.Do you have legal insurance on your home insurance? Does it have a legal helpline?0 -
The legal position is that when a flight is cancelled you are entitled to a refund from the airline- you say that Easyjet have refunded you for both outgoing and return flights .There is a difference between expenses and losses. As other posters have already advised you , the non- refundable missed hotel stay is called a consequential loss - You are not entitled to claim for consequential losses from your airline.You can claim for losses from your travel insurance.A valid expense claim would be if for example you had been stranded in Venice because your return flight was cancelled and there was no alternative flight available and no hotel provided by airline . In this case, if you had to pay out for an extra nights hotel stay at your own expense . In the situation you would be entitled to claim for this additional expense.To note with flight only bookings your entitlement to claim for losses would be exactly the same if another airline (e.g BA ) had cancelled your flights .1
-
I didn't think Easyjet did return tickets? Aren't they one of the airlines who do two separate tickets (outbound and inbound) just under the same booking number.
This means they can cancel one flight without the other and the protections are different to a return ticket.0 -
400ixl said:I didn't think Easyjet did return tickets? Aren't they one of the airlines who do two separate tickets (outbound and inbound) just under the same booking number.
This means they can cancel one flight without the other and the protections are different to a return ticket.0 -
IMHO, if you have a screen grab that shows your return flight was also cancelled, even if briefly, then you have a case for compensation. You, like any reasonable person would have looked at alternatives given the outward AND inbound cancellation.No one in their right mind is going to re-book an outbound flight without also getting their retrun flight sorted.NMany years ago, I had a not dissimilar case where I was informed by EJ that a flight was being cancelled due to proposed industrial action at Marseille. We re-booked on a different airline, to Marseille. The industrial action didn't happen but I won my case. I think it might have gone to CEDR though, with the back up of small claims court to follow,.I don't think CEDR exist now or handle EJ complaints. It looks as though ADR handle this.Try them. Its a slows process and you have to keep hassling them for progress. Small claims if unsucessful.
If you're new. read The FAQ and Vauban's Guide
The alleged Ringleader.........0 -
JPears said:IMHO, if you have a screen grab that shows your return flight was also cancelled, even if briefly, then you have a case for compensation. You, like any reasonable person would have looked at alternatives given the outward AND inbound cancellation.No one in their right mind is going to re-book an outbound flight without also getting their retrun flight sorted.NMany years ago, I had a not dissimilar case where I was informed by EJ that a flight was being cancelled due to proposed industrial action at Marseille. We re-booked on a different airline, to Marseille. The industrial action didn't happen but I won my case. I think it might have gone to CEDR though, with the back up of small claims court to follow,.I don't think CEDR exist now or handle EJ complaints. It looks as though ADR handle this.Try them. Its a slows process and you have to keep hassling them for progress. Small claims if unsucessful.
i don’t think consequential loss is ever covered (unless a package is booked).0 -
261/2004 Compensation for the cancelled (briefly) return flight.
If you're new. read The FAQ and Vauban's Guide
The alleged Ringleader.........1 -
Thanks.
so the question is would the Op win a case if the flight was never cancelled, but they saw it briefly on the internet before it was reinstated, but was never officially cancelled.
id say they were wrong to rely on information that was never communicated to them (and they got checkin emails), but maybe that’s harsh?0 -
id say they were wrong to rely on information that was never communicated to them (and they got checkin emails), but maybe that’s harsh?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards