MB PCN, Claim Form Received, Defence in progress

KeithP

Just searching the forum or scrolling back through the thread list will find three threads about Minster Baywatch most recently updated within the last week.

raptor182

Hey folks. Please find the photos attached that some of you requested to see. I hope it helps and the Defendant is able to use your advice from what you see. 

T.I.A

KeithP

Who is the Claimant on your County Court Claim Form?

@Umkomaas pointed out earlier that often a claim is made by Minster Baywatch but any contract was between the motorist and Bransby Wilson.

Those signs you have shown us uphold that hypothesis.

Out of interest, why did you blank out the four digit site code?
It can easily seen on GoogleStreetView.

raptor182

KeithP said:

Who is the Claimant on your County Court Claim Form?

Minster Baywatch is correct 

Umkomaas

@Umkomaas pointed out earlier that often a claim is made by Minster Baywatch but any contract was between the motorist and Bransby Wilson.

There you go, milk it!

D_P_Dance

The small print on that sign is horrendous and likely to be termed unfair by a judge under the Consumer Rights Act  2015, read this and complain to your MP.

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5972164/parking-eye-signs-oxford-road-reading/p1

raptor182

D_P_Dance said:

 complain to your MP.

What needs to be said?

The ridiculous amount of money the claimant is asking for?  

The poor signage?

The unjust behaviour of MB?

raptor182

Umkomaas said:

@Umkomaas pointed out earlier that often a claim is made by Minster Baywatch but any contract was between the motorist and Bransby Wilson.

There you go, milk it!

Please elaborate!

raptor182

KeithP said:

Out of interest, why did you blank out the four digit site code?
It can easily seen on GoogleStreetView.

It was in an effort to not give away the location, but have spotted a flaw in that the signage states the location. 

From everything I've read it is constantly pointed out not to give specifics to a case. I would have thought that information would fall under that bracket. 

I apologies if I'm taking actions that aren't required. As you are all aware, not everyone that comes to this forum for help and information is as well informed as you all, myself included.  

Umkomaas

raptor182 said:

Umkomaas said:

@Umkomaas pointed out earlier that often a claim is made by Minster Baywatch but any contract was between the motorist and Bransby Wilson.

There you go, milk it!

Please elaborate!

I thought it was clear from the included quote in my post. MB is not BW, BW is not MB. The landowner contract with one (BW) cannot be enforced by a stranger (MB) to that contract. Milk it!