We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Court date tomorrow: any final tips, tricks and advice?
Comments
-
100% 95Rollers
We are only talking about the parking industry here. An industry which is not regulated yet makes up figures as they go along.
It is NOT a RIGHT as there is no legal authority
The new code BANS such charges and that will be the law. When it goes to Parliament, how many MP's will agree with the ban, I would say all of them. Mr O'Brien clearly has his agenda and that will stay
When it goes to court what will a Judge do ? Agree to a fake charge which is double recovery from an un-regulated industry or ..... what government is now saying ... IT'S BANNED ?
The latter will probably be the case
0 -
So why bring it up then?!?AnotherForumite said:The a move has been debated to death, so I won’t get into it again.The point I was making is that the draft code will not change anything in law (a contract is a contract), except where the operator is seeking DVLA data.
The FACT it is on track for being eradicated is evidence in itself that it was NEVER just or fit for purpose so definitely adding this to the plethora of evidence including multiple previous judgments/ strike outs that it is an Abuse of Process. So much that the UK Govt had to step in like they did on clampers. Which funnily enough became PPCs.
Facts and Stats don't lie. Your parking using the court as "tool" and I will use truth.
The only "motorists" and "landowners" who said otherwise were found out to be fraudulent survey entries from the parking industry itself!!!! Like you say "done to death".0 -
I repeat, the new code will not apply to anyone that does not require DVLA data.patient_dream said:100% 95Rollers
We are only talking about the parking industry here. An industry which is not regulated yet makes up figures as they go along.
It is NOT a RIGHT as there is no legal authority
The new code BANS such charges and that will be the law. When it goes to Parliament, how many MP's will agree with the ban, I would say all of them. Mr O'Brien clearly has his agenda and that will stay
When it goes to court what will a Judge do ? Agree to a fake charge which is double recovery from an un-regulated industry or ..... what government is now saying ... IT'S BANNED ?
The latter will probably be the case0 -
I guess you are talking about the extra paragraph added to signs after the BPA code of practice said they could add the fake. The ones in small letters ?AnotherForumite said:The above has been debated to death, so I won’t get into it again.The point I was making is that the draft code will not change anything in law (a contract is a contract), except where the operator is seeking DVLA data.
So are you saying that those operators who retain data and do not apply to the DVLA have some sort of Exemption
That really opens up a can of worms1 -
Maybe then you should show everyone where it says thatAnotherForumite said:
I repeat, the new code will not apply to anyone that does require DVLA data.patient_dream said:100% 95Rollers
We are only talking about the parking industry here. An industry which is not regulated yet makes up figures as they go along.
It is NOT a RIGHT as there is no legal authority
The new code BANS such charges and that will be the law. When it goes to Parliament, how many MP's will agree with the ban, I would say all of them. Mr O'Brien clearly has his agenda and that will stay
When it goes to court what will a Judge do ? Agree to a fake charge which is double recovery from an un-regulated industry or ..... what government is now saying ... IT'S BANNED ?
The latter will probably be the case1 -
I repeat, I think you're wrong - the new code applies to all Notices of Parking Charge, howsoever derived. If I'm wrong, please identify the section of the new CoP / Parking Bill / guidance notes which supports your belief.AnotherForumite said:
I repeat, the new code will not apply to anyone that does not require DVLA data.patient_dream said:100% 95Rollers
We are only talking about the parking industry here. An industry which is not regulated yet makes up figures as they go along.
It is NOT a RIGHT as there is no legal authority
The new code BANS such charges and that will be the law. When it goes to Parliament, how many MP's will agree with the ban, I would say all of them. Mr O'Brien clearly has his agenda and that will stay
When it goes to court what will a Judge do ? Agree to a fake charge which is double recovery from an un-regulated industry or ..... what government is now saying ... IT'S BANNED ?
The latter will probably be the case
PS - I think you meant what I've edited above, and that is what I've replied to. Otherwise your sentence makes no sense.Jenni x3 -
None of this was on the publicly made available taped recordings of the BPA and IPC AOS meetings? held in the last weekAnotherForumite said:
I repeat, the new code will not apply to anyone that does require DVLA data.patient_dream said:100% 95Rollers
We are only talking about the parking industry here. An industry which is not regulated yet makes up figures as they go along.
It is NOT a RIGHT as there is no legal authority
The new code BANS such charges and that will be the law. When it goes to Parliament, how many MP's will agree with the ban, I would say all of them. Mr O'Brien clearly has his agenda and that will stay
When it goes to court what will a Judge do ? Agree to a fake charge which is double recovery from an un-regulated industry or ..... what government is now saying ... IT'S BANNED ?
The latter will probably be the case2 -
Agreed. The simple fact is that ALL MP's will vote this bill through on behalf of their constituents and motorists and to stop their email boxes being filled with complaints about the fake chargesBrownTrout said:
None of this was on the publicly made available taped recordings of the BPA and IPC AOS meetings? held in the last weekAnotherForumite said:
I repeat, the new code will not apply to anyone that does require DVLA data.patient_dream said:100% 95Rollers
We are only talking about the parking industry here. An industry which is not regulated yet makes up figures as they go along.
It is NOT a RIGHT as there is no legal authority
The new code BANS such charges and that will be the law. When it goes to Parliament, how many MP's will agree with the ban, I would say all of them. Mr O'Brien clearly has his agenda and that will stay
When it goes to court what will a Judge do ? Agree to a fake charge which is double recovery from an un-regulated industry or ..... what government is now saying ... IT'S BANNED ?
The latter will probably be the case1 -
Good luck to the advocate trying to explain the nuance between a case where data was acquired via the DVLA and one where it was not, and why (if AF is correct) one attracts debt collection charges and the other doesn't. Especially when many turn up having little clue about their main brief!Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street3 -
Which I don't believe they are.Umkomaas said:Good luck to the advocate trying to explain the nuance between a case where data was acquired via the DVLA and one where it was not, and why (if AF is correct) one attracts debt collection charges and the other doesn't. Especially when many turn up having little clue about their main brief!
Jenni x0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards



