CCBC Claim form, Deadline and correct defence.

bloodyccbc

Thank you all so far! 

Redx

bloodyccbc said:

If that is correct I think I am now ready to print, sign and scan. 


Thanks

You could but most people wouldn't !! I know that I wouldn't !

What you should do is attach a digital signature to your final pdf document , then email it to the ccbcaq email address , checking for the email auto receipt back , no receipt means not received ( bad for you )

Le_Kirk

bloodyccbc said:

Great, Thank you. Far better words than mine!
Another thing of concern to me now is what @Le_Kirk said.

"All this is only good if the original PCN/NTK is not POFA compliant so that they cannot hold the keeper liable"

I have no idea where the letters are that would have come from CP PLUS t/a GROUPNEXUS or DCB LEGAL to check whether that is true or not.

I see that @Coupon-mad has now assured you that CP Plus do not use POFA.  Presumably you have binned all the original documentation.  You could submit a SAR to CP Plus (Group Nexus) asking for all your data which should get you the letters.  Won't come in time for the defence but if you open the door to "no keeper liability" in your defence then you can add the evidence in your Witness Statement.

bloodyccbc

Went on a mission this morning to find any letters that I may have had regarding this. 

I found 9… CP PLUS, DRP, SCS, DCBL. 

Wow. 

Attached is the first charge notice. 

Redx

Unfortunately you blacked out the issue date , but there is no POFA warning anyway , so no keeper liability , which is why they talk about the driver

bloodyccbc

Sorry, Issue date 15/03/2017

Redx

bloodyccbc said:

Sorry, Issue date 15/03/2017

So within timescales , but not POFA compliant , no keeper warning etc

bloodyccbc

Great, so we’re good to go? 

Coupon-mad

Not unless you want to miss out useful Parking Code of Practice news story that every Defendant should now be mentioning about the added false debt recovery fees been banned by the Government today!

bloodyccbc

I just googled that and what a great piece of info to add to a defence now. 

However, I need to seek your help with where to put, use and how to abbreviate that new ruling. 

Hope I’m not asking too much of anyone.