We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Advantage of having smart meters
Options
Comments
-
wild666 said:Dolor said:wild666 said:Keep_pedalling said:wild666 said:jrawle said:wittynamegoeshere said:All meters have a lifespan, they always have had. The components inside wear over time and they lose accuracy. I remember getting our old cogs and gears one replaced with one with a digital display back in 2000-odd. This is just exactly what has always happened. It just so happens that the latest meters do a bit more than older ones.As I said in my comment, I would have no objection to a new meter being a smart meter when the time came for it to be replaced anyway. What I object to is meters being replaced before it's necessary, due to waste, and the potential for unnecessary damage to be done to my property.I also dislike the deceitful letters the big suppliers send out saying my meter is "obsolete" and must be replaced as soon as possible. Clearly twaddle, motivated by targets for smart meter installation set by the government. It's little better than the situation at the start of privatisation when salesmen would call and say you had to switch supplier as the old one had "run out of gas". Lies, plain and simple.
He turns everything off at the socket, even before I started to do so.0 -
wild666 said:wittynamegoeshere said:jrawle said:There was a similar thread a couple of weeks ago, and I posted my view there:I have so far resisted having a smart meter not because I have something to hide or am a conspiracy theorist, but because I don't like having things messed with unnecessarily. My meters work perfectly well at the moment. I have seen several accounts of people who have had gas leaks following a meter exchange. It seems that just about every job I have done at home by a tradesman is substandard, or results in damage being done to my property. If my meters genuinely wear out and need replacement, I would be happy for the replacement to be a smart meter, but not for them to be changed just for the sake of it. There is also an environmental impact of having a meter changed before the end of its life.I also do not like the way the adverts give the impression that smart meters magically save energy, with small print such as "consumer action required" the only disclaimer. Non scientifically minded people may well believe this, and actually do less to save energy once they have smart meters.I do not believe automatic meter reading will cut excessive credit balances, either. This has little to do with estimated readings, and anyone who gives their supplier a regular reading well knows. It is more to do with suppliers deliberately running up a credit to make a few extra pennies out of each customer.All meters have a lifespan, they always have had. The components inside wear over time and they lose accuracy. I remember getting our old cogs and gears one replaced with one with a digital display back in 2000-odd. This is just exactly what has always happened. It just so happens that the latest meters do a bit more than older ones.They definitely do save energy, evidenced by the huge number of threads on here where people are trying to work out what is costing them however much per hour or whatever - people are alerted to this consumption by their meter. They work out what's needlessly costing them money and switch it off. In the old days they wouldn't have known any of this.0
-
schiff said:wild666 said:wittynamegoeshere said:jrawle said:There was a similar thread a couple of weeks ago, and I posted my view there:I have so far resisted having a smart meter not because I have something to hide or am a conspiracy theorist, but because I don't like having things messed with unnecessarily. My meters work perfectly well at the moment. I have seen several accounts of people who have had gas leaks following a meter exchange. It seems that just about every job I have done at home by a tradesman is substandard, or results in damage being done to my property. If my meters genuinely wear out and need replacement, I would be happy for the replacement to be a smart meter, but not for them to be changed just for the sake of it. There is also an environmental impact of having a meter changed before the end of its life.I also do not like the way the adverts give the impression that smart meters magically save energy, with small print such as "consumer action required" the only disclaimer. Non scientifically minded people may well believe this, and actually do less to save energy once they have smart meters.I do not believe automatic meter reading will cut excessive credit balances, either. This has little to do with estimated readings, and anyone who gives their supplier a regular reading well knows. It is more to do with suppliers deliberately running up a credit to make a few extra pennies out of each customer.All meters have a lifespan, they always have had. The components inside wear over time and they lose accuracy. I remember getting our old cogs and gears one replaced with one with a digital display back in 2000-odd. This is just exactly what has always happened. It just so happens that the latest meters do a bit more than older ones.They definitely do save energy, evidenced by the huge number of threads on here where people are trying to work out what is costing them however much per hour or whatever - people are alerted to this consumption by their meter. They work out what's needlessly costing them money and switch it off. In the old days they wouldn't have known any of this.Someone please tell me what money is1
-
schiff said:wild666 said:wittynamegoeshere said:jrawle said:There was a similar thread a couple of weeks ago, and I posted my view there:I have so far resisted having a smart meter not because I have something to hide or am a conspiracy theorist, but because I don't like having things messed with unnecessarily. My meters work perfectly well at the moment. I have seen several accounts of people who have had gas leaks following a meter exchange. It seems that just about every job I have done at home by a tradesman is substandard, or results in damage being done to my property. If my meters genuinely wear out and need replacement, I would be happy for the replacement to be a smart meter, but not for them to be changed just for the sake of it. There is also an environmental impact of having a meter changed before the end of its life.I also do not like the way the adverts give the impression that smart meters magically save energy, with small print such as "consumer action required" the only disclaimer. Non scientifically minded people may well believe this, and actually do less to save energy once they have smart meters.I do not believe automatic meter reading will cut excessive credit balances, either. This has little to do with estimated readings, and anyone who gives their supplier a regular reading well knows. It is more to do with suppliers deliberately running up a credit to make a few extra pennies out of each customer.All meters have a lifespan, they always have had. The components inside wear over time and they lose accuracy. I remember getting our old cogs and gears one replaced with one with a digital display back in 2000-odd. This is just exactly what has always happened. It just so happens that the latest meters do a bit more than older ones.They definitely do save energy, evidenced by the huge number of threads on here where people are trying to work out what is costing them however much per hour or whatever - people are alerted to this consumption by their meter. They work out what's needlessly costing them money and switch it off. In the old days they wouldn't have known any of this.
Was this via a quick visual review/inspection of all your sockets or as a result of getting a smart meter?
Fundamentally it is about overall approach to power usage, consumption, even low levels, should be evident irrespective of the type of meter that is installed.
1 -
BikingBud said:schiff said:wild666 said:wittynamegoeshere said:jrawle said:There was a similar thread a couple of weeks ago, and I posted my view there:I have so far resisted having a smart meter not because I have something to hide or am a conspiracy theorist, but because I don't like having things messed with unnecessarily. My meters work perfectly well at the moment. I have seen several accounts of people who have had gas leaks following a meter exchange. It seems that just about every job I have done at home by a tradesman is substandard, or results in damage being done to my property. If my meters genuinely wear out and need replacement, I would be happy for the replacement to be a smart meter, but not for them to be changed just for the sake of it. There is also an environmental impact of having a meter changed before the end of its life.I also do not like the way the adverts give the impression that smart meters magically save energy, with small print such as "consumer action required" the only disclaimer. Non scientifically minded people may well believe this, and actually do less to save energy once they have smart meters.I do not believe automatic meter reading will cut excessive credit balances, either. This has little to do with estimated readings, and anyone who gives their supplier a regular reading well knows. It is more to do with suppliers deliberately running up a credit to make a few extra pennies out of each customer.All meters have a lifespan, they always have had. The components inside wear over time and they lose accuracy. I remember getting our old cogs and gears one replaced with one with a digital display back in 2000-odd. This is just exactly what has always happened. It just so happens that the latest meters do a bit more than older ones.They definitely do save energy, evidenced by the huge number of threads on here where people are trying to work out what is costing them however much per hour or whatever - people are alerted to this consumption by their meter. They work out what's needlessly costing them money and switch it off. In the old days they wouldn't have known any of this.
Was this via a quick visual review/inspection of all your sockets or as a result of getting a smart meter?
Fundamentally it is about overall approach to power usage, consumption, even low levels, should be evident irrespective of the type of meter that is installed.0 -
wild666 said:schiff said:wild666 said:wittynamegoeshere said:jrawle said:There was a similar thread a couple of weeks ago, and I posted my view there:I have so far resisted having a smart meter not because I have something to hide or am a conspiracy theorist, but because I don't like having things messed with unnecessarily. My meters work perfectly well at the moment. I have seen several accounts of people who have had gas leaks following a meter exchange. It seems that just about every job I have done at home by a tradesman is substandard, or results in damage being done to my property. If my meters genuinely wear out and need replacement, I would be happy for the replacement to be a smart meter, but not for them to be changed just for the sake of it. There is also an environmental impact of having a meter changed before the end of its life.I also do not like the way the adverts give the impression that smart meters magically save energy, with small print such as "consumer action required" the only disclaimer. Non scientifically minded people may well believe this, and actually do less to save energy once they have smart meters.I do not believe automatic meter reading will cut excessive credit balances, either. This has little to do with estimated readings, and anyone who gives their supplier a regular reading well knows. It is more to do with suppliers deliberately running up a credit to make a few extra pennies out of each customer.All meters have a lifespan, they always have had. The components inside wear over time and they lose accuracy. I remember getting our old cogs and gears one replaced with one with a digital display back in 2000-odd. This is just exactly what has always happened. It just so happens that the latest meters do a bit more than older ones.They definitely do save energy, evidenced by the huge number of threads on here where people are trying to work out what is costing them however much per hour or whatever - people are alerted to this consumption by their meter. They work out what's needlessly costing them money and switch it off. In the old days they wouldn't have known any of this.
1 -
littlemoney said:wild666 said:I think the red rocker switch should be enough as many homes sockets were positioned neat the ground in older homes. I recently had my flat rewired and had the sockets raised to just over 1 meter from the ground to stop me having to crouch over things to turn stuff on and off. My grandparents actually pulled the plug out of the socket.If that's true, the socket is faulty and you should get it looked at.The switch on a switched socket should be capable of turning off the appliance and removing the plug should have no additional effect.N. Hampshire, he/him. Octopus Intelligent Go elec & Tracker gas / Vodafone BB / iD mobile. Ripple Kirk Hill member.
2.72kWp PV facing SSW installed Jan 2012. 11 x 247w panels, 3.6kw inverter. 34 MWh generated, long-term average 2.6 Os.Not exactly back from my break, but dipping in and out of the forum.Ofgem cap table, Ofgem cap explainer. Economy 7 cap explainer. Gas vs E7 vs peak elec heating costs, Best kettle!4 -
No advantage of smart meter until you are forced to have one to get cheaper tarriff. I read my meters once a week, record in a spreadsheet with formula for weekly costs. I could record daily costs shouId I wish. Electricity and gas appliances are only used when needed. It's common sense, switch off when not in use and don't use standby. You don't need a smart meter to save money. I believe the smart meter uses electricity for its display so it costs money to run.
1 -
littlemoney said:I believe the smart meter uses electricity for its display so it costs money to run.0
-
littlemoney said:No advantage of smart meter until you are forced to have one to get cheaper tarriff. I read my meters once a week, record in a spreadsheet with formula for weekly costs. I could record daily costs shouId I wish. Electricity and gas appliances are only used when needed. It's common sense, switch off when not in use and don't use standby. You don't need a smart meter to save money. I believe the smart meter uses electricity for its display so it costs money to run.Someone please tell me what money is1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards