We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Over 40s being prevented from transfering LISAs to a new provider
Options

NICKGINSBERG
Posts: 1 Newbie
At the age of 39 when the LISAs were first introduced we signed up immediately, myself a S&S LISA, and my wife who was a bit more risk adverse a cash LISA. 5 years down the line, she has now decided that a S&S LISA would be more suitable, but have come up against a very large brick wall, with every provider including Moneybox, Nutmeg, H&L, AJ Bell and Foresters are excluding us on the basis of our age. The will happily accept transfers from LISAs for people aged under 40, but have informed us that a business decision is stopping them from allowing over 40s access to markets and causing us material inconvenience as we are losing out on financial returns. I cannot see how the financial ombudsman can sit back an allow providers to discriminate against people because of their age? Is this something others have come across? Do we need Martin to champion our cause?
0
Comments
-
I cannot see how the financial ombudsman can sit back an allow providers to discriminate against people because of their age?Technically, a LISA is all about age discrimination.
However, I suspect there is some confusion going on here with what they are saying and what you are saying. HL, for example, do allow you to invest beyond age 40. However, their FAQ says they cannot currently accept transfers from other Lifetime ISAs.
When you are aged over 40, I believe you have to either contribute to the existing provider or transfer the existing one first before you can then add to the new one.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
This comes up fairly regularly on here, and in one of the more recent threads, the subject of whether or not it could legitimately be construed as unlawful discrimination was raised:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6290953/lisa-after-40/p1
The scheme itself (as with many others) has age-related terms, which weakens the discrimination argument for me when applied to specific products, as ISA providers are already permitted to elect not to accept transfers, so there is an argument that it's legitimate for a provider to only accept transfers if the consumer was eligible to open a new account.
However, that's not to say that the ombudsman would see it that way, but the ombudsman service only responds reactively to individual cases and it's the regulator (FCA) that has the oversight about how regulated companies operate.
That thread highlighted some recent press attention but I'm not aware of it being on the MSE radar - however unfair it might be, it is a fairly niche problem not affecting huge numbers (relative to more significant industry issues)....1 -
dunstonh said:When you are aged over 40, I believe you have to either contribute to the existing provider or transfer the existing one first before you can then add to the new one.
Edit: actually, one was claimed (with IFA assistance) in one of the previous threads at https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/78661075/#Comment_786610751 -
eskbanker said:dunstonh said:When you are aged over 40, I believe you have to either contribute to the existing provider or transfer the existing one first before you can then add to the new one.
Edit: actually, one was claimed (with IFA assistance) in one of the previous threads at https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/78661075/#Comment_78661075
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1 -
dunstonh said:I can confirm Transact do it. However, they are an intermediary platform. No DIY.
1 -
Would it be possible for an IFA to setup a transfer and regular contribution into a Transact LISA account invested in a multi asset fund on a transactional rather than ongoing basis?Yes.If so even after paying a setup fee that might be better for someone than getting stuck with a Cash LISA for nearly 20 years.It's a cheap transaction for an IFA if you catch them during a quiet point or if there happens to be a IFA that deals with the whole family. If you ask them at a busy time and there is no family IFA then it may be harder to find one.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.4 -
eskbanker said:This comes up fairly regularly on here, and in one of the more recent threads, the subject of whether or not it could legitimately be construed as unlawful discrimination was raised:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6290953/lisa-after-40/p1
The scheme itself (as with many others) has age-related terms, which weakens the discrimination argument for me when applied to specific products, as ISA providers are already permitted to elect not to accept transfers, so there is an argument that it's legitimate for a provider to only accept transfers if the consumer was eligible to open a new account.
However, that's not to say that the ombudsman would see it that way, but the ombudsman service only responds reactively to individual cases and it's the regulator (FCA) that has the oversight about how regulated companies operate.
That thread highlighted some recent press attention but I'm not aware of it being on the MSE radar - however unfair it might be, it is a fairly niche problem not affecting huge numbers (relative to more significant industry issues)....0 -
Thrugelmir said:eskbanker said:This comes up fairly regularly on here, and in one of the more recent threads, the subject of whether or not it could legitimately be construed as unlawful discrimination was raised:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6290953/lisa-after-40/p1
The scheme itself (as with many others) has age-related terms, which weakens the discrimination argument for me when applied to specific products, as ISA providers are already permitted to elect not to accept transfers, so there is an argument that it's legitimate for a provider to only accept transfers if the consumer was eligible to open a new account.
However, that's not to say that the ombudsman would see it that way, but the ombudsman service only responds reactively to individual cases and it's the regulator (FCA) that has the oversight about how regulated companies operate.
That thread highlighted some recent press attention but I'm not aware of it being on the MSE radar - however unfair it might be, it is a fairly niche problem not affecting huge numbers (relative to more significant industry issues)....0 -
eskbanker said:Thrugelmir said:eskbanker said:This comes up fairly regularly on here, and in one of the more recent threads, the subject of whether or not it could legitimately be construed as unlawful discrimination was raised:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6290953/lisa-after-40/p1
The scheme itself (as with many others) has age-related terms, which weakens the discrimination argument for me when applied to specific products, as ISA providers are already permitted to elect not to accept transfers, so there is an argument that it's legitimate for a provider to only accept transfers if the consumer was eligible to open a new account.
However, that's not to say that the ombudsman would see it that way, but the ombudsman service only responds reactively to individual cases and it's the regulator (FCA) that has the oversight about how regulated companies operate.
That thread highlighted some recent press attention but I'm not aware of it being on the MSE radar - however unfair it might be, it is a fairly niche problem not affecting huge numbers (relative to more significant industry issues)....0 -
Thrugelmir said:Given their relative size. Companies will simply argue that it's not economic to provide the ability to transfer. Simply not cost effective.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards