We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Caught by Police using a handheld speed gun
Options
Comments
-
ontheroad1970 said:[Deleted User] said:ontheroad1970 said:[Deleted User] said:sand_hun said:Grumpy_chap said:Does anyone know whether, when there is a Community Speedwatch Area, manned by volunteers with a "gun", can they actually issue speeding penalties (NIP), or just warning letters?
Get yourself a dashcam with GPS feature that records your speed on the video. Then if you have any issues in future you can review the video to see if you were actually speeding, and then decide what to do.
Because GPS speed is real time, or at least as real time as the speed guns.1 -
Legally you are never going to prove anything using GPS data, it might be supportive evidence but it will not usurp a calibrated speed gun.
On a b-road where your speed varies, with corners, etc. I wouldn't rely on GPS. It will be 'fairly' accurate but no more. On a motorway, travelling more or less straight or shallow angle corners - at a continuous speed - the way GPS works, it will very accurate.
I've been in a passenger in a car - few years ago now - which got done for speeding by an older radar gun, and I know the driver was not going the speed he was done for. Motorway, GPS and cruise control set for 75mph - he got done at 92mph. His GPS and Speedo were both not wrong, and not wrong by almost 20mph. He got absolutely nowhere with his protests.
That day he was driving a low profile and angular car (Cayman), outside lane, and police were in one of their motorway spots measuring from an angle. Seen countless arguements disputing similar over the years, usually to no avail, and various 3rd party tests demonstrating flaws with that equipment - but..... To no avail.0 -
Jenni_D said:[Deleted User] said:ontheroad1970 said:[Deleted User] said:sand_hun said:Grumpy_chap said:Does anyone know whether, when there is a Community Speedwatch Area, manned by volunteers with a "gun", can they actually issue speeding penalties (NIP), or just warning letters?
Get yourself a dashcam with GPS feature that records your speed on the video. Then if you have any issues in future you can review the video to see if you were actually speeding, and then decide what to do.
Because GPS speed is real time, or at least as real time as the speed guns.
Also the gun has been calibrated and is type-approved for speed measuring. GPS satnav has not.
Does this matter in the real world? Probably not. Does this matter in the legal world? Absolutely.3 -
Car_54 said:There are no signals “bouncing back” from the satellites. The satellites transmit their own signals.
So my technical analysis may have been incorrect but the basic point was still sound.Jenni x0 -
Isn't GPS only accurate to a metre or two anyway? Accuracy will also vary according to atmospheric conditions, proximity to other terrain features etc. Given that the speed calculation is based on calculating the time between two points, any inaccuracy in the positions will affect the speed. Even if you were to assume that any inaccuracies are likely to be the same for consecutive position measurements, this does introduce an uncertainty which would prevent it from being used as good evidence in court; the random error in a GPS system must surely be greater than that of a speed gun.
0 -
Car_54 said:[Deleted User] said:Ectophile said:[Deleted User] said:sand_hun said:Grumpy_chap said:Does anyone know whether, when there is a Community Speedwatch Area, manned by volunteers with a "gun", can they actually issue speeding penalties (NIP), or just warning letters?
Get yourself a dashcam with GPS feature that records your speed on the video. Then if you have any issues in future you can review the video to see if you were actually speeding, and then decide what to do.If it ends up in court, the police will be able to produce a training record for the officer who was using the gun, and a calibration certificate for the speed gun itself.You will have a recording on a dashcam, which will come with no calibration information.Which do you think the courts will accept?
The GPS receiver uses timing information from the satellites, which have atomic clocks. That's how it determines location. There is no calibration because it's just maths, and any oscillators used are all disciplined by the signal from the satellites.
If any of it was off by even nanoseconds the position information would be way off too. Ideally you want to log the position data as well so you can demonstrate that it places the car on the road, proving that the speed calculation is accurate.0 -
ontheroad1970 said:[Deleted User] said:ontheroad1970 said:[Deleted User] said:sand_hun said:Grumpy_chap said:Does anyone know whether, when there is a Community Speedwatch Area, manned by volunteers with a "gun", can they actually issue speeding penalties (NIP), or just warning letters?
Get yourself a dashcam with GPS feature that records your speed on the video. Then if you have any issues in future you can review the video to see if you were actually speeding, and then decide what to do.
Because GPS speed is real time, or at least as real time as the speed guns.
The value displayed is for the last second. Most GNSS modules update position once per second by default, but many can do it faster if required.
But it's irrelevant anyway. If it shows you doing 10 MPH lower for a few seconds before and after the alleged incident there is no way that the car could have accelerated that much and then slowed down again within one second.0 -
Jenni_D said:[Deleted User] said:ontheroad1970 said:[Deleted User] said:sand_hun said:Grumpy_chap said:Does anyone know whether, when there is a Community Speedwatch Area, manned by volunteers with a "gun", can they actually issue speeding penalties (NIP), or just warning letters?
Get yourself a dashcam with GPS feature that records your speed on the video. Then if you have any issues in future you can review the video to see if you were actually speeding, and then decide what to do.
Because GPS speed is real time, or at least as real time as the speed guns.
Also the gun has been calibrated and is type-approved for speed measuring. GPS satnav has not.
Does this matter in the real world? Probably not. Does this matter in the legal world? Absolutely.
The delay from the satellites is how GPS works. The signal is sent continuously so the actual delay doesn't matter, and does not mean that the location information is not instantaneous for when it is reported once a second. Speed is for the second before it is reported.
None of which matters because the speed gun is known to be janky so they always get several seconds of measurements with it. The display only updates every second or so as multiple measurements are averaged.
You will have GPS data for minutes before and after the measurement period and can show that your vehicle didn't exceed the limit at any time.0 -
tobygarrod939 said:Legally you are never going to prove anything using GPS data, it might be supportive evidence but it will not usurp a calibrated speed gun.
On a b-road where your speed varies, with corners, etc. I wouldn't rely on GPS. It will be 'fairly' accurate but no more. On a motorway, travelling more or less straight or shallow angle corners - at a continuous speed - the way GPS works, it will very accurate.
I've been in a passenger in a car - few years ago now - which got done for speeding by an older radar gun, and I know the driver was not going the speed he was done for. Motorway, GPS and cruise control set for 75mph - he got done at 92mph. His GPS and Speedo were both not wrong, and not wrong by almost 20mph. He got absolutely nowhere with his protests.
That day he was driving a low profile and angular car (Cayman), outside lane, and police were in one of their motorway spots measuring from an angle. Seen countless arguements disputing similar over the years, usually to no avail, and various 3rd party tests demonstrating flaws with that equipment - but..... To no avail.
Yes, to win you need to have the evidence and a decent lawyer, go to court and make your case. Pleading with the police won't work, you will have to go to court and it will probably cost you more than the fine anyway.
That's why I said only do it if you have a lot to lose, otherwise just do the speed awareness course and keep your eyes peeled for speed gun scams.0 -
I haven't read all of this as I've been away. But to challenge this you need to prove that the measurement taken by the device the police used cannot be relied upon. What you have in the way of SatNavs or anything else is immaterial. An approved device operated in the correct manner is assumed to be accurate unless the contrary can be proved - and you have to do the proving. Proving your SatNav may be right does not prove the other device was wrong, and that's what you have to do. You will need expert assistance and a good motoring specialist lawyer to present your case and it will cost you £Thousands, which you will not be able to recover even if you are acquitted.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards