We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Confused by extraordinarily high gas usage
Comments
-
I know that this has been discussed on the forum before and I don't know if there was ever a definitive conclusion, but if they're only putting the central heating on on the timer a couple of times a day and it's cold between times - this may not be the most efficient use of the boiler - working hard to get the house warm a couple of times a day.
As an experiment a couple of years ago, I put the heating on constant and controlled it with the thermostat instead of the timer. The house was warmer generally - and therefore more comfortable - and it didn't use any more fuel than it had before. I can easily make adjustments with the thermostat if I want something different.2 -
[Deleted User] said:A word to the wise. If a meter fault is suspected, then get it checked before a smart meter is fitted. The old meter will then go to a testing lab rather than to the local skip. As many people have found out, it is very difficult to prove a faulty meter if the old meter is not available to be tested.0
-
BooJewels said:I know that this has been discussed on the forum before and I don't know if there was ever a definitive conclusion, but if they're only putting the central heating on on the timer a couple of times a day and it's cold between times - this may not be the most efficient use of the boiler - working hard to get the house warm a couple of times a day.
As an experiment a couple of years ago, I put the heating on constant and controlled it with the thermostat instead of the timer. The house was warmer generally - and therefore more comfortable - and it didn't use any more fuel than it had before. I can easily make adjustments with the thermostat if I want something different.
Overall I think it's a myth that having the heating on constantly is more efficient though.
https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/utilities/energy-saving-myths/
1 -
@Ultrasonic - as I said, I wasn't sure if there was any definitive conclusion or not, only citing my own experience (and yes, I work at home, so am here all day) - the article you linked concluded that it wasn't actually that clear cut, as there are too many variables.
But it might be worth the OP's parents' trying for a few days - just for comparisons sake - so they get a definitive answer for their own situation. It all depends on the age and construction of the property, quality of insulation, what rooms you use, where the rads are sited etc etc.
I didn't think my thermostat worked that well, until my 6'2" son pointed out that at 4'11", I'm totally mis-reading the dial which is nearly 6' off the ground - because of the angles. I see it as 2 degrees warmer than it actually is.0 -
BooJewels said:the article you linked concluded that it wasn't actually that clear cut, as there are too many variables.
.
0 -
Whether is more efficient or not (probably little difference either way) it's certainly nicer to wake up to, and come home to a nice warm house! Rather than sitting around freezing your proverbials off, waiting for the icicles to melt!
1 -
DeletedUser said:Whether is more efficient or not (probably little difference either way) it's certainly nicer to wake up to, and come home to a nice warm house! Rather than sitting around freezing your proverbials off, waiting for the icicles to melt!1
-
BooJewels said:
As an experiment a couple of years ago, I put the heating on constant and controlled it with the thermostat instead of the timer. The house was warmer generally - and therefore more comfortable - and it didn't use any more fuel than it had before. I can easily make adjustments with the thermostat if I want something different.#2 Saving for Christmas 2024 - £1 a day challenge. £325 of £3661 -
JGB1955 said:BooJewels said:
As an experiment a couple of years ago, I put the heating on constant and controlled it with the thermostat instead of the timer. The house was warmer generally - and therefore more comfortable - and it didn't use any more fuel than it had before. I can easily make adjustments with the thermostat if I want something different.
Her courage will change the world.
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.2 -
FreeBear said:JGB1955 said:BooJewels said:
As an experiment a couple of years ago, I put the heating on constant and controlled it with the thermostat instead of the timer. The house was warmer generally - and therefore more comfortable - and it didn't use any more fuel than it had before. I can easily make adjustments with the thermostat if I want something different.
N. Hampshire, he/him. Octopus Intelligent Go elec & Tracker gas / Vodafone BB / iD mobile. Ripple Kirk Hill member.
2.72kWp PV facing SSW installed Jan 2012. 11 x 247w panels, 3.6kw inverter. 34 MWh generated, long-term average 2.6 Os.Not exactly back from my break, but dipping in and out of the forum.Ofgem cap table, Ofgem cap explainer. Economy 7 cap explainer. Gas vs E7 vs peak elec heating costs, Best kettle!0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards