We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Looking for advice

13

Comments

  • D_P_Dance
    D_P_Dance Posts: 11,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You should complain to  YOUR MP
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • I attempted to send this email to Gladstones:

    ***********************************

    Dear XXXX,

    Thank you for your recent correspondence.

    I note that you have added an unlawful amount to the original PCN of £70.

    Having conducted some research on this matter I can reveal that Judges have dismissed an entire claim because of this.

    Case in point:

    Excel v Wilkinson


    At the Bradford County Court, District Judge Claire Jackson (now HHJ Jackson, a Specialist Civil Circuit Judge) decided to hear a 'test case' a few months ago, where £60 had been added to a parking charge despite Judges up and down the country repeatedly disallowing that sum and warning parking firms not to waste court time with such spurious claims.   That case was Excel v Wilkinson: G4QZ465V, heard in July 2020 and leave to appeal was refused and that route was not pursued.  The Judge concluded that such claims are proceedings with 'an improper collateral purpose'.   This Judge - and others who have since copied her words and struck dozens of cases out in late 2020 and into 2021 - went into significant detail and concluded that parking operators (such as this Claimant) are seeking to circumvent CPR 27.14 as well as breaching the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   DJ Hickinbottom has recently struck more cases out in that court area, stating: ''I find that striking out this claim is the only appropriate manner in which the disapproval of the court can be shown''.

    Please also note the following:

    (a) I am seeking debt advice but I deny any debt and the case must be put 'on hold' for not less than 30 days under the PAP for debt claims 2017.
    (b) I have sent your client a SAR
    (c) also confirm your correct 'address for service' if you've moved and the PPC has two addresses.

    Many thanks.

    ***********************************

    However it bounced as rejected by recipient?

    Should I now resort to posting? Any ideas welcome.

    thanks.
  • Coupon-mad
    Coupon-mad Posts: 155,611 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Don't send that, it is truly pointless and Excel v Wilkinson was recently trumped by VCS v Percy as discussed on other threads.

    That is not what the NEWBIES thread says to send!  Gets you nowhere.
    PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
    CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
    Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
  • Thanks for all your help so far.
  • Thanks for sharing,

    It looks like they are under prosecution.
  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    When you say complain to your MP I'm guessing I should complain to the MP for Portsmouth as I am not based there.

    I did say

    Your local MP, the one for your own constituency !!

    the one you did or didnt vote for who represents you in parliament

    nobody mentioned contacting any other MP

    Parliamentary rules dictate that you must go through your own MP, the others wont deal with you because you are not a constituent voter in their constituence

    so YOUR MP

  • Redx said:
    When you say complain to your MP I'm guessing I should complain to the MP for Portsmouth as I am not based there.

    I did say

    Your local MP, the one for your own constituency !!

    the one you did or didnt vote for who represents you in parliament

    nobody mentioned contacting any other MP

    Parliamentary rules dictate that you must go through your own MP, the others wont deal with you because you are not a constituent voter in their constituence

    so YOUR MP

    You did indeed. I wasn't sure if you were aware of the logistics so I wanted to clarify. Thanks again!!
  • D_P_Dance
    D_P_Dance Posts: 11,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper

    I do not think that much here escapes Read.

    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • What's the easiest way to uncover the details of the land owner?
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.