We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Renewal fee
Comments
-
Whilst the advice that it could take months, if not years for an S21 notice to result in an eviction order is legally correct, could this not make it difficult to rent a new property following an eviction? If the agency/landlord of the new property requests a reference from the previous landlord, it isn't going to be a good one is it?0
-
It depends if the landlord actually wants the tenant out or if it is the letting agent being economical with the truth to generate more money.Some landlords and tenants are not clued in with their rights and obligations relying upon letting agents to 'have the knowledge'.In many cases the landlord will most likely not push for an eviction if it means loosing a reliable tenant and is a bluff by the agent.May you find your sister soon Helli.
Sleep well.0 -
davilown said:Mr_ML said:anselld said:It is not legal.Slithery said:Which country are you in?canaldumidi said:If England/Wales (not sure about the other 2) it's not legal. You could always pay, get the renewal, then reclaim the fee as per the attached guidance.Or as suggested above, simply move to a monthly periodic (rolling) tenancy (see link).Post 4: Ending/renewing an AST: what happens when a fixed term ends? How can a LL or tenant end a tenancy? What is a periodic tenancy?
Thanks for your help. I don't think I can move to an ast:
"If you do not wish to extend your tenancy, we would kindly ask that you inform us as soon as possible to allow time to make the required arrangements to terminate your tenancy, re-market the property and return deposits where applicable. If this is the case, please email your notice to xxx"
I'll tell them that's no legal, let's see their answer.Slithery said:Mr_ML said:davilown said:Mr_ML said:Folks thank you very much again. I'm reading the link now.
My contract finishes on 24th of November and I'd like to sign another year without paying the fee.
I'll update the thread next Monday.
I'd go for a rolling contract for the extra flexibility it gives you. It will be much easier to leave when you want if your circumstances change unexpectedly.MaryNB said:Mr_ML said:MaryNB said:davilown said:Mr_ML said:anselld said:It is not legal.Slithery said:Which country are you in?canaldumidi said:If England/Wales (not sure about the other 2) it's not legal. You could always pay, get the renewal, then reclaim the fee as per the attached guidance.Or as suggested above, simply move to a monthly periodic (rolling) tenancy (see link).Post 4: Ending/renewing an AST: what happens when a fixed term ends? How can a LL or tenant end a tenancy? What is a periodic tenancy?
Thanks for your help. I don't think I can move to an ast:
"If you do not wish to extend your tenancy, we would kindly ask that you inform us as soon as possible to allow time to make the required arrangements to terminate your tenancy, re-market the property and return deposits where applicable. If this is the case, please email your notice to xxx"
I'll tell them that's no legal, let's see their answer.Mr_ML said:davilown said:Mr_ML said:Folks thank you very much again. I'm reading the link now.
My contract finishes on 24th of November and I'd like to sign another year without paying the fee.
I'll update the thread next Monday.The letting agent can only issue an S21 if the landlord agrees. The letting agency wants to to renew so they can charge the landlord more fees. While they cannot charge you as the tenant, they can charge the landlord. It also will cost the landlord a lot of money to find new tenants and as someone else has pointed out, it's unlikely they'll try to get rid of you if you're a decent tenant who always pays their rent.
The agency's wording to you is specifically designed to trick you into giving notice if you don't want to renew because they know it's the only way to get you out quickly. If you refuse to leave it could take months, maybe more than a year with current court backlogs. A landlord agreeing to go down that route if you are a decent paying tenant would be baffling but it is the worst case scenario.I'm back! Big mistake, I signed this:"4.1 payments4.1.5 to pay £150 inclusive of VAT in respect of each extension of the Tenancy. Should any extension or renewal agreement be negotiated or arranged the Renewal Fee is to be paid by the Tenant, even is for any reason the extension is not completed. "I know I should have read my contract ...Anyway, I'm not willing to pay the fee so my only option now is to move to the rolling contract, right?0 -
What they choose to write in their contract is irrelevant, they still can't charge you a fee for this. If they try to I'd remind them of their obligations under the Tenants Fee Act.3
-
The Tenant Fees Act over-rules anything they put in the contract.
2 -
I'm back! Big mistake, I signed this:"4.1 payments4.1.5 to pay £150 inclusive of VAT in respect of each extension of the Tenancy. Should any extension or renewal agreement be negotiated or arranged the Renewal Fee is to be paid by the Tenant, even is for any reason the extension is not completed. "I know I should have read my contract ...Anyway, I'm not willing to pay the fee so my only option now is to move to the rolling contract, right?1
-
Mr_ML said:I'm back! Big mistake, I signed this:"4.1 payments4.1.5 to pay £150 inclusive of VAT in respect of each extension of the Tenancy. Should any extension or renewal agreement be negotiated or arranged the Renewal Fee is to be paid by the Tenant, even is for any reason the extension is not completed. "I know I should have read my contract ...Anyway, I'm not willing to pay the fee so my only option now is to move to the rolling contract, right?
They are liars, trying to get money out of you, and probably out of the landlord too.
Since 1 June 2020 it has been illegal to charge renewal fees, no matter what you might have signed. (Just so you know, in this kind of contract situation, they are a business so should "know better" than you as a non-business person, so no judge will take their side when they have tricked you into agreeing to pay something illegal.)
https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/private_renting/letting_agent_fees_for_tenants
They also probably want to get you onto a fixed term contract so they can charge the landlord a big fee now. When I was renting, I looked at the LA's terms for landlord fees and they charge the landlord their management fee upfront for the whole length of the contract. So if I'd signed for 12 months, the LA would have charged the landlord their % of the whole year's rent right away. If I'd stayed on rolling, they would only have charged the landlord each month as it went along. So no surprise the LA kept telling us all that fixed 12 month contracts were the only option...
2 -
Gavin83 said:What they choose to write in their contract is irrelevant, they still can't charge you a fee for this. If they try to I'd remind them of their obligations under the Tenants Fee Act.canaldumidi said:The Tenant Fees Act over-rules anything they put in the contract.Robbo66 said:I'm back! Big mistake, I signed this:"4.1 payments4.1.5 to pay £150 inclusive of VAT in respect of each extension of the Tenancy. Should any extension or renewal agreement be negotiated or arranged the Renewal Fee is to be paid by the Tenant, even is for any reason the extension is not completed. "I know I should have read my contract ...Anyway, I'm not willing to pay the fee so my only option now is to move to the rolling contract, right?gingercordial said:Mr_ML said:I'm back! Big mistake, I signed this:"4.1 payments4.1.5 to pay £150 inclusive of VAT in respect of each extension of the Tenancy. Should any extension or renewal agreement be negotiated or arranged the Renewal Fee is to be paid by the Tenant, even is for any reason the extension is not completed. "I know I should have read my contract ...Anyway, I'm not willing to pay the fee so my only option now is to move to the rolling contract, right?
They are liars, trying to get money out of you, and probably out of the landlord too.
Since 1 June 2020 it has been illegal to charge renewal fees, no matter what you might have signed. (Just so you know, in this kind of contract situation, they are a business so should "know better" than you as a non-business person, so no judge will take their side when they have tricked you into agreeing to pay something illegal.)
https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/private_renting/letting_agent_fees_for_tenants
They also probably want to get you onto a fixed term contract so they can charge the landlord a big fee now. When I was renting, I looked at the LA's terms for landlord fees and they charge the landlord their management fee upfront for the whole length of the contract. So if I'd signed for 12 months, the LA would have charged the landlord their % of the whole year's rent right away. If I'd stayed on rolling, they would only have charged the landlord each month as it went along. So no surprise the LA kept telling us all that fixed 12 month contracts were the only option...
"Good morning,Thank you for your email,
We have this agreement down as a NHA which is a company let. This means that the fee is chargeable and would be required before we can proceed with the renewal.
Many thanks"
Thanks again.
0 -
So they are claiming this is a Non-Housing Act let because it is a company let.* how is the contract described?* is the property provided to you as in any way related to your work? eg are you an agricultural worker provided with accomodation by your employer?They may simply be trying to circumvent the Housing Act by sayig it is not an AST, or it may genuinely not be an AST. We would need more information.See
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.7K Life & Family
- 256.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards