We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Wall collapse- neighbours fault?

Options
2»

Comments

  • Section62
    Section62 Posts: 9,753 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Twopints said:

    Er, yes, that's how walls usually work, they have to be supported by plants, not by bricks and mortar  :#
    Folks might be surprised.

    http://rootlok.co.uk/vegetated-wall-system

    Roots can damage traditional walls, but equally roots can be used to lock structural elements together.

    Exactly how any wall gains its strength and stability can vary over time.
  • stuart45
    stuart45 Posts: 4,850 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I've repaired and rebuilt a lot of masonry walls, especially stone, damaged by Ivy. Once it's got well established and grown into the centre of the wall and wrecked the joints it's removal is a waste of time without a rebuild. Always best to get rid of it while it's still on the surface.
  • Section62
    Section62 Posts: 9,753 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper

    Get the point about the ivy but lets not pretend it added to the structural integrity of the wall.
    It might have damaged the motar joints over time, but it could be argued that the ivy was binding the wall together prior to collapse, and that removal of the ivy was the immediate cause.

    The bricks have fallen onto your side which would suggest the force came from her side of the boundary.
    Pressure from behind - or pulling from the front - could cause the bricks to fall in that direction.

    I'd suggest that the ivy being removed and the collapse of the wall being simultaneous makes a strong case that pulling on the ivy was likely a significant contribution the the collapse.


    No matter. The wall appears to have a ground retaining function, so whoever is responsible for the wall is now responsible for replacing it with something suitable to restore that function.

    If not set out in the property deeds, the owners of the two properties need to agree how the responsibility should be split, or let a court decide.  The cheapest overall approach would be to come to some kind of agreement without the need for legal action.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.