We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Civil Enforcement ANPR Letter
Comments
-


Issue date 9/7/20210 -
I can't see anything about Protection of Freedoms Act, date was 28 June 2021, issue date 9 July 2021Umkomaas said:In terms of the CEL NtK, does it anywhere in the letter (often the back page, sometimes among all the guff on Hire/Lease Vehicles) make reference to the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Schedule 4) para 9(2)(f)?
Also, please provide the date of the parking event and the Date of Issue of the NtK as shown on it.1 -
One day too late-issue date of Friday 9th July is deemed to have been received on Tuesday 13th July, (today!); which is the 15th day after the parking event.R3y2727 said:
I can't see anything about Protection of Freedoms Act, date was 28 June 2021, issue date 9 July 2021Umkomaas said:In terms of the CEL NtK, does it anywhere in the letter (often the back page, sometimes among all the guff on Hire/Lease Vehicles) make reference to the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Schedule 4) para 9(2)(f)?
Also, please provide the date of the parking event and the Date of Issue of the NtK as shown on it.2 -
So I can challenge on that basis alone?Castle said:
One day too late-issue date of Friday 9th July is deemed to have been received on Tuesday 13th July, (today!); which is the 15th day after the parking event.R3y2727 said:
I can't see anything about Protection of Freedoms Act, date was 28 June 2021, issue date 9 July 2021Umkomaas said:In terms of the CEL NtK, does it anywhere in the letter (often the back page, sometimes among all the guff on Hire/Lease Vehicles) make reference to the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Schedule 4) para 9(2)(f)?
Also, please provide the date of the parking event and the Date of Issue of the NtK as shown on it.0 -
You can certainly be assured that that Notice to Keeper is not capable of holding the keeper liable for anything that the driver may have done. Is that what you mean?R3y2727 said:
So I can challenge on that basis alone?Castle said:
One day too late-issue date of Friday 9th July is deemed to have been received on Tuesday 13th July, (today!); which is the 15th day after the parking event.R3y2727 said:
I can't see anything about Protection of Freedoms Act, date was 28 June 2021, issue date 9 July 2021Umkomaas said:In terms of the CEL NtK, does it anywhere in the letter (often the back page, sometimes among all the guff on Hire/Lease Vehicles) make reference to the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Schedule 4) para 9(2)(f)?
Also, please provide the date of the parking event and the Date of Issue of the NtK as shown on it.2 -
No, I mean on the basis of Castle's comment about being one day too lateKeithP said:
You can certainly be assured that that Notice to Keeper is not capable of holding the keeper liable for anything that the driver may have done. Is that what you mean?R3y2727 said:
So I can challenge on that basis alone?Castle said:
One day too late-issue date of Friday 9th July is deemed to have been received on Tuesday 13th July, (today!); which is the 15th day after the parking event.R3y2727 said:
I can't see anything about Protection of Freedoms Act, date was 28 June 2021, issue date 9 July 2021Umkomaas said:In terms of the CEL NtK, does it anywhere in the letter (often the back page, sometimes among all the guff on Hire/Lease Vehicles) make reference to the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Schedule 4) para 9(2)(f)?
Also, please provide the date of the parking event and the Date of Issue of the NtK as shown on it.0 -
Yes that's exactly what I meant.R3y2727 said:
No, I mean on the basis of Castle's comment about being one day too lateKeithP said:
You can certainly be assured that that Notice to Keeper is not capable of holding the keeper liable for anything that the driver may have done. Is that what you mean?R3y2727 said:
So I can challenge on that basis alone?Castle said:
One day too late-issue date of Friday 9th July is deemed to have been received on Tuesday 13th July, (today!); which is the 15th day after the parking event.R3y2727 said:
I can't see anything about Protection of Freedoms Act, date was 28 June 2021, issue date 9 July 2021Umkomaas said:In terms of the CEL NtK, does it anywhere in the letter (often the back page, sometimes among all the guff on Hire/Lease Vehicles) make reference to the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Schedule 4) para 9(2)(f)?
Also, please provide the date of the parking event and the Date of Issue of the NtK as shown on it.
With the NtK being late, it is incapable of transferring any driver's liability to the keeper.
But please don't think that will stop CEL blundering on.2 -
Aah, ok. This is all new to me, you're all being so helpful, thank you!KeithP said:
Yes that's exactly what I meant.R3y2727 said:
No, I mean on the basis of Castle's comment about being one day too lateKeithP said:
You can certainly be assured that that Notice to Keeper is not capable of holding the keeper liable for anything that the driver may have done. Is that what you mean?R3y2727 said:
So I can challenge on that basis alone?Castle said:
One day too late-issue date of Friday 9th July is deemed to have been received on Tuesday 13th July, (today!); which is the 15th day after the parking event.R3y2727 said:
I can't see anything about Protection of Freedoms Act, date was 28 June 2021, issue date 9 July 2021Umkomaas said:In terms of the CEL NtK, does it anywhere in the letter (often the back page, sometimes among all the guff on Hire/Lease Vehicles) make reference to the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Schedule 4) para 9(2)(f)?
Also, please provide the date of the parking event and the Date of Issue of the NtK as shown on it.
With the NtK being late, it is incapable of transferring any driver's liability to the keeper.
But please don't think that will stop CEL blundering on.1 -
So , the basics are
No POFA warning to the keeper on the NTK
Outside the 14 day deadline under POFA for keeper liabilityNo parking contract on offer as it's forbidden signage at night , due to being permit only at night
Use the blue text template , appealing as keeper , no blabbing about who was driving
Add an extra line to state that
The PCN fails to comply with POFA under timescales and wording , so no keeper liability , so cancel the PCN forthwith or contact the Driver ( who shall not be named )3 -
Brilliant, thank you so much for your adviceRedx said:So , the basics are
No POFA warning to the keeper on the NTK
Outside the 14 day deadline under POFA for keeper liabilityNo parking contract on offer as it's forbidden signage at night , due to being permit only at night
Use the blue text template , appealing as keeper , no blabbing about who was driving
Add an extra line to state that
The PCN fails to comply with POFA under timescales and wording , so no keeper liability , so cancel the PCN forthwith or contact the Driver ( who shall not be named )1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards