We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Metal clad extension

Tim11111000111
Posts: 54 Forumite

I'm looking at buying a house. One thing that is putting me off is that the current owner had an extension done, and it is clad in what I consider to be a fairly hideous corrugated metal (see photos). In Scotland, so we have seen a Home Report already which describes it as "The wall construction to the extension cannot be confirmed. The extension is clad externally with a corrugated metal material, and the walls appear to be below 250mm thick."
Anyone have experience of this? My main question is how easy would it be to remove the cladding and replace it with something more aesthetically appealing? As a last resort we could just paint it to make it slightly more attractive - unless that is a big no-no for some reason?


0
Comments
-
You're right - That is one ugly extension. Would have been alright in an industrial setting, but not residential.Replacing the cladding with something easier on the eye shouldn't be too difficult - I'm assuming there is some form of studwork underneath. The walls being less than 250mm thick would suggest a wood frame construction (SIPs ?). Stripping off the cladding would give you a chance to confirm this.Any information available from the local council planning portal ?Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
Erik Aronesty, 2014
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.1 -
FreeBear said:You're right - That is one ugly extension. Would have been alright in an industrial setting, but not residential.Replacing the cladding with something easier on the eye shouldn't be too difficult - I'm assuming there is some form of studwork underneath. The walls being less than 250mm thick would suggest a wood frame construction (SIPs ?). Stripping off the cladding would give you a chance to confirm this.Any information available from the local council planning portal ?
I've found the planning application/building warrant on the local planning portal but can't find any details beyond it was approved and a Certificate of Design was issued. It was done in 2015 so I guess the more detailed supporting docs are no longer available.
0 -
FreeBear said:You're right - That is one ugly extension. Would have been alright in an industrial setting, but not residential.Replacing the cladding with something easier on the eye shouldn't be too difficult - I'm assuming there is some form of studwork underneath. The walls being less than 250mm thick would suggest a wood frame construction (SIPs ?). Stripping off the cladding would give you a chance to confirm this.Any information available from the local council planning portal ?Tall, dark & handsome. Well two out of three ain't bad.1
-
How on earth did they ever get permission for that monstrosity !
0 -
I think another layer of nicer cladding can be added on the top of the existing one.
0 -
Tim11111000111 said:FreeBear said:You're right - That is one ugly extension. Would have been alright in an industrial setting, but not residential.Replacing the cladding with something easier on the eye shouldn't be too difficult - I'm assuming there is some form of studwork underneath. The walls being less than 250mm thick would suggest a wood frame construction (SIPs ?). Stripping off the cladding would give you a chance to confirm this.Any information available from the local council planning portal ?
I've found the planning application/building warrant on the local planning portal but can't find any details beyond it was approved and a Certificate of Design was issued. It was done in 2015 so I guess the more detailed supporting docs are no longer available.
Also, yes, that is pretty hideous. I expect it could be replaced or another layer of something more attractive added over the top.0 -
If it was me, I would assume a rebuild of the entire structure as part of my personal valuation of the house. If you assume that there is a brick wall, its going to be single skin, or its a cheap timber frame with the cheapest cladding they could manage. I'd run a mile.
2 -
Metal framed extensions such as the OPs are very common where I live, although they do not generally have a metal covering, more often wood.There are four with a two-minute walk from where I live.0
-
pmartin86 said:If it was me, I would assume a rebuild of the entire structure as part of my personal valuation of the house. If you assume that there is a brick wall, its going to be single skin, or its a cheap timber frame with the cheapest cladding they could manage. I'd run a mile.I'd assume that you have no experience of the last 15-20 years of building technology.My house has less than 250mm walls and it wasn't cheap by any stretch of the imagination. The future doesn't sit with cavity wall construction and it should have moved on already.The extension has been signed off, so it's fairly safe to assume that it will be of a recognised standard. The thing with modern builds is that the outer skin is decorative and interchangeable. It's almost
like a phone cover.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
3 -
sevenhills said:Metal framed extensions such as the OPs are very common where I live, although they do not generally have a metal covering, more often wood.There are four with a two-minute walk from where I live.The vendor must know what it is.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards