We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Scammed
Options

Lolls79
Posts: 4 Newbie

Looking for some advice. I've recently been a victim of a HMRC scam and they have taken from me over £8000. My bank can't refund any of the monies, so now im left gutted and heartbroken. Does anyone know or tjar could advise where I can seek advice next in relation to getting this money back.
0
Comments
-
you will need to provide more details if you want suggestions over where to go next
As you have posted on the Coronavirus support thread rather than the Cutting Tax board, is this something to do with SEISS or similar?
there was a recent thread on the Cutting Tax board, is your case similar to this https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6273595/hmrc-asking-me-to-repay-from-a-rebate/p1
You may be better posting the story on the Cutting Tax board2 -
1
-
Sorry lolls79. You should report the scam to ActionFraud, but they will not do anything about it. I'm afraid you are not going to be able to get this money back.
I would suggest that you write to your MP because the banking system could be changed to avoid this - the problem is with overseas payments - once the money goes off shore the trail is lost. If the money has to remain on shore for 90 days there would be time for your fraud to be reported to your bank, the money traced and recovered. Evidence would be needed as to the source of money that was being sent off shore it it were to leave earlier than 90 days. I would also make it a rule that you can only send half of the money in the account, and the other half is locked up for 90 days in case the money sent abroad was stolen. These ideas would have a massive impact on international trade, but it would also create opportunities for banks to sell services to avoid the impacts while still protecting consumers.The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.1 -
tacpot12 said:Sorry lolls79. You should report the scam to ActionFraud, but they will not do anything about it. I'm afraid you are not going to be able to get this money back.
I would suggest that you write to your MP because the banking system could be changed to avoid this - the problem is with overseas payments - once the money goes off shore the trail is lost. If the money has to remain on shore for 90 days there would be time for your fraud to be reported to your bank, the money traced and recovered. Evidence would be needed as to the source of money that was being sent off shore it it were to leave earlier than 90 days. I would also make it a rule that you can only send half of the money in the account, and the other half is locked up for 90 days in case the money sent abroad was stolen. These ideas would have a massive impact on international trade, but it would also create opportunities for banks to sell services to avoid the impacts while still protecting consumers.6 -
tacpot12 said:Sorry lolls79. You should report the scam to ActionFraud, but they will not do anything about it. I'm afraid you are not going to be able to get this money back.
I would suggest that you write to your MP because the banking system could be changed to avoid this - the problem is with overseas payments - once the money goes off shore the trail is lost. If the money has to remain on shore for 90 days there would be time for your fraud to be reported to your bank, the money traced and recovered. Evidence would be needed as to the source of money that was being sent off shore it it were to leave earlier than 90 days. I would also make it a rule that you can only send half of the money in the account, and the other half is locked up for 90 days in case the money sent abroad was stolen. These ideas would have a massive impact on international trade, but it would also create opportunities for banks to sell services to avoid the impacts while still protecting consumers.0 -
GeordieGeorge said:tacpot12 said:Sorry lolls79. You should report the scam to ActionFraud, but they will not do anything about it. I'm afraid you are not going to be able to get this money back.
I would suggest that you write to your MP because the banking system could be changed to avoid this - the problem is with overseas payments - once the money goes off shore the trail is lost. If the money has to remain on shore for 90 days there would be time for your fraud to be reported to your bank, the money traced and recovered. Evidence would be needed as to the source of money that was being sent off shore it it were to leave earlier than 90 days. I would also make it a rule that you can only send half of the money in the account, and the other half is locked up for 90 days in case the money sent abroad was stolen. These ideas would have a massive impact on international trade, but it would also create opportunities for banks to sell services to avoid the impacts while still protecting consumers.The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.0 -
tacpot12 said:Sorry lolls79. You should report the scam to ActionFraud, but they will not do anything about it. I'm afraid you are not going to be able to get this money back.
I would suggest that you write to your MP because the banking system could be changed to avoid this - the problem is with overseas payments - once the money goes off shore the trail is lost. If the money has to remain on shore for 90 days there would be time for your fraud to be reported to your bank, the money traced and recovered. Evidence would be needed as to the source of money that was being sent off shore it it were to leave earlier than 90 days. I would also make it a rule that you can only send half of the money in the account, and the other half is locked up for 90 days in case the money sent abroad was stolen. These ideas would have a massive impact on international trade, but it would also create opportunities for banks to sell services to avoid the impacts while still protecting consumers.7 -
MattMattMattUK said:tacpot12 said:Sorry lolls79. You should report the scam to ActionFraud, but they will not do anything about it. I'm afraid you are not going to be able to get this money back.
I would suggest that you write to your MP because the banking system could be changed to avoid this - the problem is with overseas payments - once the money goes off shore the trail is lost. If the money has to remain on shore for 90 days there would be time for your fraud to be reported to your bank, the money traced and recovered. Evidence would be needed as to the source of money that was being sent off shore it it were to leave earlier than 90 days. I would also make it a rule that you can only send half of the money in the account, and the other half is locked up for 90 days in case the money sent abroad was stolen. These ideas would have a massive impact on international trade, but it would also create opportunities for banks to sell services to avoid the impacts while still protecting consumers.
Believe me, if someone had stolen £8,000 from you, you wouldn't give a stuff about international trade.The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.1 -
What about Joe Bloggs buying from abroad?
No business is going to wait 90 days for their money.4 -
A debate on a possible solution for the future, however contentious, is irrelevant to OP. Now that the main banks have introduced CoP (confirmation of payee), what did OP put in as the transferee's account name (I am assuming we must have a bank transfer here)?
If it wasn't HMRC, why did OP make the transfer? If it was HMRC, why did the banks allow such an account to be opened?7
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 256.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards