We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Regrets - London property VS shares


I regret that I've had a large chunk of money in London property instead of the stock market, for the last couple of years.
I should have sold after Brexit but didn't know what to do and hung on through 2017/18 and then the house depreciated in 2019, then covid hit. My rental yield is only 4% after tax and I think I would have made far more in the stock market around 8% at least - in hindsight!
I'm planning to sell the house this year and put the money in shares. But I wish I'd sold in 2017, or even in 2019 at the depreciated values.
Anyone got a similar experience or agree/disagree that Shares > London property? My only positive is that my tenants are lovely and have been there for years and the house has been easy to manage. I am an accidental landlord after moving in with my husband so never wanted to rent property in the first place.
Comments
-
What’s the point in dwelling on this?9
-
Shaztastic3000 said:What’s the point in dwelling on this?0
-
dw4518 said:
Hoping someone would disagree with me and set out some arguments for why the house is a better investment.
The question is what'll happen going forward. If we knew that, we'd be rich.6 -
It’s easy to predict the winner of the 3.40 at Ascot at 4.00.13
-
There's more than just the gross rental yield vs stocks yield - the house may / may not have been better in the end, but just saying make sure you compare the right figures
- property has rental income plus capital gains, vs dividends and gains on stocks
- expenses for each (repairs, agents, gas certs, stamp duty etc vs broker fees on stocks)
- tax (rent @ income tax, property gains @ 18/28%, stock gains @ 10% / 20%)
- leverage - if you had a mortgage, you could get the rent / capital gain on the full value while only investing part of the cash, though also deduct interest cost. could you get a margin loan on a stocks & shares portfolio?
£50k to invest as deposit / 50k mortgage costing 1% interest (=£500). You purchase a £100k house which yields 4% -> £3.5k gain after interest
Note this is simplistic as it ignores tax / fees but shows that the leverage may make one investment have a better or similar overall gain on the amount invested even if the headline yield is much worse.
Then there's the whole unfortunate lack of a crystal ball.. so even if one was clearly better historically, you couldn't have 100% known that beforehand, and doesn't mean the same thing will be better in the future.2 -
Some things to consider:
* It's easy to judge with the benefit of hindsight.
* It's easy to pick the reference class in retrospect. Why is it just "shares" rather than 70:30 (say) stocks:bonds? Why not compare to Bitcoin?
* Much easier to leverage your property than your shares. No-one will lend you hundreds of thousands to buy Vanguard at sub-2% interest! 75% LTV makes the rental yield a lot more attractive.
* Most property owners don't pay CGT, or income tax on the "yield," so it's a better investment for them. The government has deliberately placed landlords at a significant tax disadvantage, in order to encourage owner-occupiers, and you are competing against them when you buy.1 -
Thanks saajan_12, sadly I'm not leveraged as paid the mortgage off in 2018, but agree with everyone's point about not having a crystal ball!
I feel like I know that shares is going to outperform this particular house (given it's already hit the capital appreciation ceiling) hence I'm planning to sell it. I kind of had that feeling in 2018 onwards but sat on my thumb not wanting to make a decision.0 -
Thanks Salemicus, hehe I do use the "why don't I compare to bitcoin" argument to make myself feel better. But I never would have bought bitcoin, whereas I had thoughts about selling the house.
0 -
dw4518 said:
I regret that I've had a large chunk of money in London property instead of the stock market, for the last couple of years.
I should have sold after Brexit but didn't know what to do and hung on through 2017/18 and then the house depreciated in 2019, then covid hit. My rental yield is only 4% after tax and I think I would have made far more in the stock market around 8% at least - in hindsight!
I'm planning to sell the house this year and put the money in shares. But I wish I'd sold in 2017, or even in 2019 at the depreciated values.
Anyone got a similar experience or agree/disagree that Shares > London property? My only positive is that my tenants are lovely and have been there for years and the house has been easy to manage. I am an accidental landlord after moving in with my husband so never wanted to rent property in the first place.
Tracker funds are possibly more stable and long-term yield stable returns.
I personally prefer property/funds to shares but depends on your strategy, age, motivation etc.
In the past i had a sharesave plan which yielded great returns but did not sell and now dropped in value so all assets do fluctuate.
1 -
With the benefit of 20/20 hindsight I should have kept my property in the Central Belt and let it out instead of selling it when I moved to the North East. C’est la vie.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.9K Spending & Discounts
- 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards