Read the full story:
'Share Centre LISA customer? Transfer to a new provider now if you don't want your savings moved to OneFamily and invested'
We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
MSE News: Share Centre LISA customer? You'll be moved to OneFamily shortly & any cash auto-invested
MSE_Petar
Posts: 382 MSE Staff
Share Centre Lifetime ISA customers will see their accounts transferred to OneFamily in July, while any cash currently held will be automatically invested. If you don't want to move to OneFamily or have your savings automatically invested, you need to request a transfer to a new provider as soon as possible.
Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply.
Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply.
0
Comments
-
I wonder if this is what EQi LISA customers have to look forward to.It would have been nice to see a mention in the article about the problems over-40s are having finding a S&S LISA provider that will let them transfer their LISA. Despite it being permitted for someone over 40 to open a LISA for the purpose of transferring, most providers refuse to accept applications from anyone over the age of 40, which is essential to the transfer process. This seems to be a case of "computer says no" rather than coherent policy.1
-
I would assume EQI customers will be the same if ii had acquired the LISA part of the business, though reading through the emails from EQI it seems it wasn't acquired so hopefully EQI will continue to manage these accounts, but more likely offloaded to One Family.masonic said:I wonder if this is what EQi LISA customers have to look forward to.It would have been nice to see a mention in the article about the problems over-40s are having finding a S&S LISA provider that will let them transfer their LISA. Despite it being permitted for someone over 40 to open a LISA for the purpose of transferring, most providers refuse to accept applications from anyone over the age of 40, which is essential to the transfer process. This seems to be a case of "computer says no" rather than coherent policy.
I am in the situation you explain the above, over 40 and I would be unable to move the account due to no one accepting transfers in, to then be ported to One Family with only a choice of two funds none of which appeal to me with no way or moving the account would be pretty disgraceful, maybe a complaint should be filed to the ombudsman.
Just shows how shows how poor the market is for these LISA accounts. If you over 40 it's a case of tough luck, zero competition and no say or if you don't like it the only option is to close the account and be penalised0 -
Tugboat said:
I would assume EQI customers will be the same if ii had acquired the LISA part of the business, though reading through the emails from EQI it seems it wasn't acquired so hopefully EQI will continue to manage these accounts, but more likely offloaded to One Family.masonic said:I wonder if this is what EQi LISA customers have to look forward to.It would have been nice to see a mention in the article about the problems over-40s are having finding a S&S LISA provider that will let them transfer their LISA. Despite it being permitted for someone over 40 to open a LISA for the purpose of transferring, most providers refuse to accept applications from anyone over the age of 40, which is essential to the transfer process. This seems to be a case of "computer says no" rather than coherent policy.I see you've queried this in the EQi thread, so will respond there to avoid taking the thread too far off topic.
I can understand the lack of popularity given the low contribution limits and extra overheads, such as bonus claims. Each provider should be free to make a commercial decision about whether to offer them. The issue around transfers is separate to that, however. Providers are inconveniencing one small group of customers, while going to the trouble of offering the same service to others. This is not about a commercial decision, it is about a flaw in their operations. It is the sort of thing that could be sorted quite easily with some good old MSE pressure.Tugboat said:I am in the situation you explain the above, over 40 and I would be unable to move the account due to no one accepting transfers in, to then be ported to One Family with only a choice of two funds none of which appeal to me with no way or moving the account would be pretty disgraceful, maybe a complaint should be filed to the ombudsman.
Just shows how shows how poor the market is for these LISA accounts. If you over 40 it's a case of tough luck, zero competition and no say or if you don't like it the only option is to close the account and be penalisedThe over 40 group will be growing larger over time. At some point providers who wish to continue offering LISAs will need to act. Better for them to do so sooner rather than later.Alternatively, the Government needs to plan for these products becoming obsolete as more providers withdraw from the market, such as converting them to S&S ISAs.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 245.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards