We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Underweighting the US using index funds

Options
12346»

Comments

  • Prism
    Prism Posts: 3,847 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I wouldn't say a reduction of 17% is just noise. And if you can manage your own simple, market tracking portfolio, it's free money. Getting better returns from VLS80, than VLS60 isn't free money, it comes with more risk.
    A collection of regional index funds in the desired weights is likely a bit cheaper than an all world index fund assuming there wasn't a significant charge for rebalancing.
  • MX5huggy
    MX5huggy Posts: 7,162 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Prism said:
    I wouldn't say a reduction of 17% is just noise. And if you can manage your own simple, market tracking portfolio, it's free money. Getting better returns from VLS80, than VLS60 isn't free money, it comes with more risk.
    A collection of regional index funds in the desired weights is likely a bit cheaper than an all world index fund assuming there wasn't a significant charge for rebalancing.
    Yes I looked at building VWRL from components. Worked out about half the price 0.11 vs 0.22. The only bit you pay 0.22 for is emerging markets. Could make it marginal cheaper by splitting out the Uk from Europe. In the end decided it was not worth the hassle for my small investment.
  • Alice_Holt
    Alice_Holt Posts: 6,094 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    I want to keep my US equity exposure under 40%. My core + satellite approach is pushing it over that level so is there a way to reduce index fund exposure to the US other than i) VLS, but that shifts the reduced US exposure to the UK rather than spreading it globally, or ii) buying several region-specific index funds? Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) doesn’t seem to be sold in the UK.

          This looks at the historical performance of the US and UK market: 
           https://monevator.com/us-versus-uk-shares/
    Alice Holt Forest situated some 4 miles south of Farnham forms the most northerly gateway to the South Downs National Park.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic

    I want to keep my US equity exposure under 40%. My core + satellite approach is pushing it over that level so is there a way to reduce index fund exposure to the US other than i) VLS, but that shifts the reduced US exposure to the UK rather than spreading it globally, or ii) buying several region-specific index funds? Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) doesn’t seem to be sold in the UK.

          This looks at the historical performance of the US and UK market: 
           https://monevator.com/us-versus-uk-shares/
    The US being an an emerging market over much of the period a fact which easily gets overlooked. 
  • Sebo027
    Sebo027 Posts: 212 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 31 May 2021 at 6:44AM
    AlanP_2 said:
    AlanP_2 said:

    So, what are the advantages of a cap-weighted index fund v an equal weighted index fund which are the most obvious direct comparators?

    You seem to be comparing apples and pears. A cap weighted fund invests across a range of indexes. If you like small and mid caps, it might hold too little of them for your liking – Vanguard FTSE All Cap Index Fund invests (by Morningstar’s allocations) 17% in mid caps and 4% in small caps. An equal weighted product, by contrast, allocates an equal amount to all the companies within a single index, the most typical example being an S&P Equal Weight ETF (XDWE, although Morningstar mistakenly calls it XDEW), where you will invest as much in the smallest S&P constituent as in Apple.

    I don't think I am, as I am talking about comparing at the Index level (I should have made that clearer).

    Your S&P Equal Weight v a S&P market-cap weighted index for example.

    Both are passive strategies (after making the management decision about which to choose) that will track the Index so why is one inherently better than the other?
    OK, gotcha - I misread. It's an interesting question whether there is a theoretical basis for whether S&P500 or S&P500 equal weighted will, costs aside, outperform over time. Not one I can answer. But here is their performance since 2014: cap weighted in blue, equal weighted in red.
    Performance Chart - Portfolio

    Interesting graph. Here's a similar one over a longer period of time:

    Though another important point to note is, for broader indexes, the deviation is less pronounced (see below): 


    Taking, for example, the MSCI World index - I suspect the price of an equally weighted ETF may have slightly higher fees that might level out the 0.24 difference in performance. I also can't find an equal weighting ETF that tracks this index, though admittedly i haven't tried too hard.. 
    See links:
    https://www.solactive.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Solactive-Equal-Weighting-vs.-Market-Cap-Weighting.pdf
    https://www.lynalden.com/equal-weighted-index-funds/

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.