We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Money saving vs life saving
Supersonos
Posts: 1,080 Forumite
in Motoring
The front tyres on my car are looking pretty bald and one of them appears to have a slow puncture. The rear tyres look ok. The car has done 17k miles.
4 new tyres is around £650 but I've read that it's a good idea to move the rear tyres to the front and therefore just buy two new tyres. But at what point is saving money worth the increased risk of an accident?
4 new tyres is around £650 but I've read that it's a good idea to move the rear tyres to the front and therefore just buy two new tyres. But at what point is saving money worth the increased risk of an accident?
0
Comments
-
How much tread's left?
£160+/tyre suggests some fairly serious stuff. What size?0 -
Is your car front or rear wheel drive?Supersonos said:The front tyres on my car are looking pretty bald and one of them appears to have a slow puncture. The rear tyres look ok. The car has done 17k miles.
4 new tyres is around £650 but I've read that it's a good idea to move the rear tyres to the front and therefore just buy two new tyres. But at what point is saving money worth the increased risk of an accident?
You would only move the rear tyres to the front if you had rear wheel drive (as it keeps the grip on the driven wheels).
OR, if you have front wheel drive, move the front tyres to the rear - this one makes more sense as it keeps maximum grip on the wheels that do the work in controlling the direction of the car plus driven wheels.
I am not even sure if the former actually makes sense as the time the tyres need most grip is when in emergency steering on a poor road.
Back to money-saving:
Why do you need new tyres after only 17k miles?
Why are four tyres £650? The last set of 4 tyres I got £150 for cash.
0 -
The theory goes that understeer is far more natural to catch than oversteer, so better tyres on the back mean you're far more likely to simply ease off and tighten the line if you notice grip starting to fail.Grumpy_chap said:
Is your car front or rear wheel drive?Supersonos said:...but I've read that it's a good idea to move the rear tyres to the front
You would only move the rear tyres to the front if you had rear wheel drive (as it keeps the grip on the driven wheels).
OR, if you have front wheel drive, move the front tyres to the rear - this one makes more sense as it keeps maximum grip on the wheels that do the work in controlling the direction of the car plus driven wheels.
I am not even sure if the former actually makes sense as the time the tyres need most grip is when in emergency steering on a poor road.Why are four tyres £650? The last set of 4 tyres I got £150 for cash.
Sub-£40 each? Chinese ditchfinders? Sometimes, extra money is worth spending for a far better product - there's usually decent mid-range brands for not much more than the cheap'n'nasty teflon-cheese-concrete mixtures.
0 -
It's a BMW X1 so I'm guessing rear.Grumpy_chap said:
Is your car front or rear wheel drive?Supersonos said:The front tyres on my car are looking pretty bald and one of them appears to have a slow puncture. The rear tyres look ok. The car has done 17k miles.
4 new tyres is around £650 but I've read that it's a good idea to move the rear tyres to the front and therefore just buy two new tyres. But at what point is saving money worth the increased risk of an accident?
Back to money-saving:
Why do you need new tyres after only 17k miles?
Why are four tyres £650? The last set of 4 tyres I got £150 for cash.
225/45 R19 are the tyres, so for a decent set (Michelin/Hanook etc.) they're £150-170 per tyre.
0 -
X1 is front or four wheel, or was last time I lookedSupersonos said:
It's a BMW X1 so I'm guessing rear.1 -
Well, I've always had front wheel drive and, if the rear tyres wear always put new on the front and moved the old front to rear. Keeping maximum grip on the driven and steering wheels.
Adrian suggests I've been doing it wrong in any case.
The following article seems to support Adrian's advice:
https://www.kwik-fit.com/tyres/information/tyre-rotation
I apologise if my earlier comments were incorrect and caused any confusion - that is just what I've always done, and no garage has ever told me it's not correct
1 -
Are the tyre sizes the same on the front and back? Mine have different sizes and I understand that it is not uncommon these days.Supersonos said:
It's a BMW X1 so I'm guessing rear.Grumpy_chap said:
Is your car front or rear wheel drive?Supersonos said:The front tyres on my car are looking pretty bald and one of them appears to have a slow puncture. The rear tyres look ok. The car has done 17k miles.
4 new tyres is around £650 but I've read that it's a good idea to move the rear tyres to the front and therefore just buy two new tyres. But at what point is saving money worth the increased risk of an accident?
Back to money-saving:
Why do you need new tyres after only 17k miles?
Why are four tyres £650? The last set of 4 tyres I got £150 for cash.
225/45 R19 are the tyres, so for a decent set (Michelin/Hanook etc.) they're £150-170 per tyre.Northern Ireland club member No 382 :j0 -
If it's "X-drive" (4wd), then you really need to replace all four together and rotate regularly to keep wear even either end. Viscous centre diff...
If it's "S-drive", 2wd, then which generation is it?
The original, 2009-2015, was RWD, same platform as the contemporary 3-series. The newer, 2015-on, is a tubby Mini on stilts, so FWD.0 -
You're correct. It's "X-Drive" which I think is BMW's version of all-wheel drive.Sandtree said:
X1 is front or four wheel, or was last time I lookedSupersonos said:
It's a BMW X1 so I'm guessing rear.
(I thought BMW didn't do FWD - thought they championed RWD).0 -
Yeah, same front and back. And now I've realised it's 4WD, probably makes sense to do all 4 tyres. So that's £600-700 gone in one go. And after only 17k miles seems extreme.Money_Grabber13579 said:
Are the tyre sizes the same on the front and back? Mine have different sizes and I understand that it is not uncommon these days.Supersonos said:
It's a BMW X1 so I'm guessing rear.Grumpy_chap said:
Is your car front or rear wheel drive?Supersonos said:The front tyres on my car are looking pretty bald and one of them appears to have a slow puncture. The rear tyres look ok. The car has done 17k miles.
4 new tyres is around £650 but I've read that it's a good idea to move the rear tyres to the front and therefore just buy two new tyres. But at what point is saving money worth the increased risk of an accident?
Back to money-saving:
Why do you need new tyres after only 17k miles?
Why are four tyres £650? The last set of 4 tyres I got £150 for cash.
225/45 R19 are the tyres, so for a decent set (Michelin/Hanook etc.) they're £150-170 per tyre.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards