DCB Legal on behalf of Highview Parking - Advice on Defence for Claim

Redman2186

Not sure why I put the POFA 2012 as a Spoiler  - Has quite a nice effect though!!

Redman2186

Umkomaas said:

You'll get a very fast response, but it won't be what you are looking for. They will send you a pro forma to complete asking whether or not you were the driver and requiring copies of your passport or driving licence as proof of ID. Don't send copies of those.  You will then need to take this up with the ICO.  Read other Highview/CP Plus/Group Nexus threads to understand this ploy and what others have done.   This won't be a quickie!

I might just jump pre-empt them and reach out to ICO in advance stating that I'm aware of request from Group Nexus for unjust forms of ID in order to provide SAR and that I'd like their advice - can then just forward on directly to Group Nexus to let them know.

Redman2186

All that is needed is a copy of your V5 .... this confirms the information they have already otherwise they could not have contacted you. Plus a redacted copy of a utility bill

I sent a redacted mortgage letter with initial email - lets see what they come back with. I guess my immediate concern was that I'd hit a blackhole where they didn't even have an autoresponse to say, we have your email we will get back to you in 10 days

Umkomaas

Redman2186 said:

Umkomaas said:

You'll get a very fast response, but it won't be what you are looking for. They will send you a pro forma to complete asking whether or not you were the driver and requiring copies of your passport or driving licence as proof of ID. Don't send copies of those.  You will then need to take this up with the ICO.  Read other Highview/CP Plus/Group Nexus threads to understand this ploy and what others have done.   This won't be a quickie!

I might just jump pre-empt them and reach out to ICO in advance stating that I'm aware of request from Group Nexus for unjust forms of ID in order to provide SAR and that I'd like their advice - can then just forward on directly to Group Nexus to let them know.

They won't.  The ICO have significantly bigger fish to fry than piddling parking charge issues and they won't accede to and execute action on speculative requests. Why would they?

beamerguy

Redman2186 said:

All that is needed is a copy of your V5 .... this confirms the information they have already otherwise they could not have contacted you. Plus a redacted copy of a utility bill

I sent a redacted mortgage letter with initial email - lets see what they come back with. I guess my immediate concern was that I'd hit a blackhole where they didn't even have an autoresponse to say, we have your email we will get back to you in 10 days

Yes, ask the ICO using the points above 
Nexus is an unknown quantity.  I don't think the ICO would ever suggest sending such sensitive material, they of all people know the dangers

Redman2186

Umkomaas said:

They won't.  The ICO have significantly bigger fish to fry than piddling parking charge issues and they won't accede to and execute action on speculative requests. Why would they?

Fair point

Redx

You can ask the ICO for advice , but better to then report Nexus after 2 failures to provide the data due to their ludicrous requests

I would have provided 2 or 3 forms of I D with your wife's name , address and date unredacted , including a copy of the claim form as the clincher as one of them

Paragraph 5 seems a lot better now

Redman2186

Redx said:

You can ask the ICO for advice , but better to then report Nexus after 2 failures to provide the data due to their ludicrous requests

Yes agree - I'll play their games

I would have provided 2 or 3 forms of I D with your wife's name , address and date unredacted , including a copy of the claim form as the clincher as one of them

I have a slight problem with the Claim Form - My Wife tore it into 6 pieces thinking it was another scam letter - It has been sellotaped back together - Lucky she mentioned it as doing it.

Paragraph 5 seems a lot better now

Thanks

Redx

Ha ha , she is not the only person to make that mistake , we have seen worse , although why anyone would destroy legal papers from a government office is beyond us. DVLA , HMRC , DWP , all legit government agencies , as are HM courts

Default CCJ with 6 years of credit rating issues follow those actions in many cases , which cannot be fixed

beamerguy

Redman2186 said:

I have a slight problem with the Claim Form - My Wife tore it into 6 pieces thinking it was another scam letter - It has been sellotaped back together - Lucky she mentioned it as doing it.

So funny, of course these daft claims deserve such action

When you win, you will get a letter from the court ..... ask your wife to frame it