CTS LAW Letter before claim Help needed

Ed30reflex

beamerguy said:

The claim by CST is one MEGA FAKE.

PARKING TICKETS ARE £100 ..... CST HAVE ADDED A FAKE £800 ?

Asking you to pay DRP ?  CST are still totally disillusioned where DRP fit into the picture ?

As DRP simply cannot instruct CST, they became extinct, a DODO SINCE THEIR LAST RUBBISH LETTER was sent to you

You certainly will not be paying DRP


The group thread for CST will help you.  You must respond to CST and do as everyone else has done ....
ASK FOR THEIR LEGAL AUTHORITY TO ADD £800.

AND .... in your case "PROOF THAT YOU OWE DRP £2100"

It will be no surprise that CST never reply to these questions because they have no answers.

No answers means that their claim is wholly unreliable

CST letters' forum group thread

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6166004/cst-letters-forum-group-thread/p1

Thank you Beamerguy! 

I do agree, they are adding a high amount fake money to make me scared and anxious to pay in order for it to be the best price what is disgusting to think a-lot of people who are unaware of these forums and maybe elderly people who have been harassed by things like this.  

Also i didn't understand your 3rd sentence,  I understand that DRP cannot instruct CST and now DRP are ''nobody'' as such however on the letter sent to me it says ''Instructed by ECP'' however my issue is the fact that if instructed by ECP then why are the payment details to DRP and not ECP, and if the payment details are meant to be to ECP and this was a mistake on CTS behalf, then who is gaining the extra £800 of fake money.

After i send my response back to ECP issuing a SAR and explain the reasons such as, grace period, loading unloading, the extra money added, payment to DRP, time of issue / ticket. you believe they will send a letter to attend to court or drop the case at that point. Lastly when sending the SAR to ECP should i inform them i am contacting the DVLA?

Ed30reflex

Redx said:

Ed30reflex said:

Redx said:

Read the newbies FAQ sticky thread near the top of the forum , any reply denies any alleged debt and to place the matter on hold for 30 days pending a SAR reply by the claimant and to allow you to seek debt management advice. You can also add that the Jopson versus Homeguard case takes precedence on loading and unloading cases like this and will be in your defence

Also email a SAR to the DPO at the PPC ( ECP ) and attach a copy of the V5C or 2 recent redacted copies of utility bills as proof of I D under the GDPR law to obtain all your data , do not use your passport or driving licence for this , due to data protection

So 2 jobs to do

Also read the CST letters group thread on here , where dozens of you have had similar letters

Do not fill in those financial forms , do nothing with them !!

Thank you so much!! 

Just one thing, with the forums they have given me, do i send this back to them blank with my letter saying that i am seeking legal advice and do not claim any alleged debt? 

I have seen a email that may be for them, so going to do both routes. 

I said do nothing with them , which means do nothing with them , can't make it any clearer

Yes , use eMail addresses

Confirmed! 

Ed30reflex

Le_Kirk said:

Ed30reflex said:

Just one thing, with the forums forms they have given me, do i send this back to them blank with my letter saying that i am seeking legal advice and do not claim any alleged debt? 

I have seen a email that may be for them, so going to do both routes. 

You do not send the forms anywhere.  You write back refuting their claim and explaining that you are seeking DEBT advice, even though you deny any debt exists and you require them to put the case on hold for 30 days in line with the pre-action protocol for debt claims section 4.2: -

4.2 If the debtor indicates that they are seeking debt advice, the creditor must allow the debtor a reasonable period for the advice to be obtained. In any event, the creditor should not start court proceedings less than 30 days from receipt of the completed Reply Form or 30 days from the creditor providing any documents requested by the debtor, whichever is the later. 

The reply form indicated here could be replaced by your letter/e-mail and does not refer to financial forms that the claimant has sent to you.

just wanted to confirm appreciate the response. 

Umkomaas

Thank you so much for the information regarding the DVLA i did not think of this and also highly doubt they have applied each time to obtain my details. I do not have the logbook as the vehicle sold over a year ago what should i do in my case regarding the DVLA?

Just give them proof of who you are - maybe copy of driving licence, utility bills. To be sure, why not call the DVLA and ask them to confirm the correct process if you have sold the vehicle in question. Horse's mouth .....

Ed30reflex

Great, i am sure a copy of my id / utility bills will do the job as i did make them aware i had sold the car at the time too.  

beamerguy

Ed30reflex i     "It says ''Instructed by ECP'' however my issue is the fact that if instructed by ECP then why are the payment details to DRP and not ECP,"

And that is my point.  Not only are CST faking the amounts, they are also faking who to pay.

Worth asking CST the question.

CST and DRP are bed fellows.  Therefore CST are attempting to support DRP who are joined at the hip
DRP have no legal right to receive any money.

DRP are only circus clowns and CST appear to have joined the circus, 

" Lastly when sending the SAR to ECP should i inform them i am contacting the DVLA?"

Your SAR is for collecting information they hold on you.  No point in alerting them to anything else


CST may well be stupid enough to issue a court claim because it is a lot of money.  It will cost them to do that but ....... immediately they have a problem because to do so, they need to sign a statement of truth which is not true.  A judge could rule contempt of court against them and that is serious

Any claim adding fake amounts will not be reliable and as such you can ask for the case to be struck out for abuse of process and to be awarded costs and as ECP are penalising you for doing your day to day business, unreasonable costs could be awarded as well.


CST are and have always been out of their depth chasing parking tickets and it's a surprise that ECP have even instructed them.  An honest claim is one thing but trying to extort £800 from you is another

Ed30reflex

beamerguy said:

Ed30reflex i     "It says ''Instructed by ECP'' however my issue is the fact that if instructed by ECP then why are the payment details to DRP and not ECP,"

And that is my point.  Not only are CST faking the amounts, they are also faking who to pay.

Worth asking CST the question.

CST and DRP are bed fellows.  Therefore CST are attempting to support DRP who are joined at the hip
DRP have no legal right to receive any money.

DRP are only circus clowns and CST appear to have joined the circus, 

" Lastly when sending the SAR to ECP should i inform them i am contacting the DVLA?"

Your SAR is for collecting information they hold on you.  No point in alerting them to anything else


CST may well be stupid enough to issue a court claim because it is a lot of money.  It will cost them to do that but ....... immediately they have a problem because to do so, they need to sign a statement of truth which is not true.  A judge could rule contempt of court against them and that is serious

Any claim adding fake amounts will not be reliable and as such you can ask for the case to be struck out for abuse of process and to be awarded costs and as ECP are penalising you for doing your day to day business, unreasonable costs could be awarded as well.


CST are and have always been out of their depth chasing parking tickets and it's a surprise that ECP have even instructed them.  An honest claim is one thing but trying to extort £800 from you is another

Top man, your response has really helped going to post office tomorrow and sending all emails today. 

Ed30reflex

beamerguy said:

Ed30reflex i     "It says ''Instructed by ECP'' however my issue is the fact that if instructed by ECP then why are the payment details to DRP and not ECP,"

And that is my point.  Not only are CST faking the amounts, they are also faking who to pay.

Worth asking CST the question.

CST and DRP are bed fellows.  Therefore CST are attempting to support DRP who are joined at the hip
DRP have no legal right to receive any money.

DRP are only circus clowns and CST appear to have joined the circus, 

" Lastly when sending the SAR to ECP should i inform them i am contacting the DVLA?"

Your SAR is for collecting information they hold on you.  No point in alerting them to anything else


CST may well be stupid enough to issue a court claim because it is a lot of money.  It will cost them to do that but ....... immediately they have a problem because to do so, they need to sign a statement of truth which is not true.  A judge could rule contempt of court against them and that is serious

Any claim adding fake amounts will not be reliable and as such you can ask for the case to be struck out for abuse of process and to be awarded costs and as ECP are penalising you for doing your day to day business, unreasonable costs could be awarded as well.


CST are and have always been out of their depth chasing parking tickets and it's a surprise that ECP have even instructed them.  An honest claim is one thing but trying to extort £800 from you is another

Hi Beamerguy,

Hope all is well. 

Just wondering, i have got everything ready to send out now however going through some of the old papers i have built up i just wanted to double check something.

You see how CTS LAW should not be putting the extra £60+ on top, does it change anything that it was the DRP that added the extra money on and not actually CTS LAW, although they are putting a price that is still not correct.

Lastly i found a old letter from CTS LAW saying instructed by DRP so again i have this in paper if i did go court showing that the reason a response was made as this is all false claims and caused nothing but stress and time!

Coupon-mad

They all pretend the add the £60 and it is false, because the parking firm has never paid it.  CST have asked for it and so did DRP, because that's the money that funds and perpetuates the ambulance-chaser-style business model of these parasite firms.  Neither of them charged it.

Ed30reflex

I have sent a response back to ECR & CTS as-well DVLA and DPO as per our discussion. Once I have a response back, I’f I do! I will put the update here incase it helps any one else out.