We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Vanguard Lifestrategy fund advice
NanT
Posts: 31 Forumite
Hello I am planning on moving £40k from a cash isa to a S&S isa and investing it in a Vanguard Lifestrategy fund and I intend to add further money to it over the coming years. This will be my first S&S isa. Please correct me if I'm wrong but as I understand it I will pay 0.22% charges whichever platform I use but then there will be additional charges of varying amounts depending on which platform it is.
Which platform would you advise using so that I will pay the least charges overall?
Which platform would you advise using so that I will pay the least charges overall?
0
Comments
-
You won't actually part company with the 0.22% OCF as it's an internal cost paid within the fund (i.e. before results are shown), but you can compare platform costs for your investing profile at comparison sites such as:
1 -
VLS held within Vanguard will cost you circa £15 per quarter with that £40k, but there may come a point when holding VLS elsewhere is cheaper.1
-
You should be aware that the small differences in annual platform charges ( 0.2% for example ) will be > 100 times less than how much the actual fund could go up and down.
Just to put platform charges in perspective.1 -
Albermarle said:You should be aware that the small differences in annual platform charges ( 0.2% for example ) will be > 100 times less than how much the actual fund could go up and down.
Just to put platform charges in perspective.Yes but then over a 50 year investment a 0.20% difference in annual charges could result in around 10% different outcome.So if you can get the investment you want at a lower price why not?2 -
Thanks for the info re. the 0.22% OCF and links to compare costs, looks like Halifax and iWeb are the two cheapest. Any thoughts on on these two platforms?eskbanker said:You won't actually part company with the 0.22% OCF as it's an internal cost paid within the fund (i.e. before results are shown), but you can compare platform costs for your investing profile at comparison sites such as:0 -
My thoughts exactly.Alexland said:Albermarle said:You should be aware that the small differences in annual platform charges ( 0.2% for example ) will be > 100 times less than how much the actual fund could go up and down.
Just to put platform charges in perspective.Yes but then over a 50 year investment a 0.20% difference in annual charges could result in around 10% different outcome.So if you can get the investment you want at a lower price why not?0 -
So if you can get the investment you want at a lower price why not?
I do not disagree, but was just making the point that the investment choice/performance is much more important.
Some newbie investors/posters ( not necessarily this one ) seem to forget that sometimes.
1 -
They're cheap but that doesn't necessarily mean they're the best - what are you looking for? Other criteria for judging platforms would include range of investments offered, customer service, availability of apps/quality of tech, etc, but they're both mainstream products with a reasonable reputation.NanT said:
Thanks for the info re. the 0.22% OCF and links to compare costs, looks like Halifax and iWeb are the two cheapest. Any thoughts on on these two platforms?eskbanker said:You won't actually part company with the 0.22% OCF as it's an internal cost paid within the fund (i.e. before results are shown), but you can compare platform costs for your investing profile at comparison sites such as:1 -
Albermarle said:
I do not disagree, but was just making the point that the investment choice/performance is much more important.
I agree but if they have already decided on the VLS investment then at £40k (and hopefully growing) then it would be cheaper in the long run to pay iWeb's £100 setup charge and only pay the occasional £5 trade. We use iWeb and find them to be good enough but as with all platforms individual experiences can vary.
1 -
A previous poster on another thread added Lloyds to the platform mix. Does anyone have any experience of them Vs iweb?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

