*Updated* SUCCESS against BW Legal/UK Parking Patrol Office Ltd

Le_Kirk

Nice one!          

beamerguy

Rosa_Klebb said:

So some great news all, I have SUCCESS! 

"The Defendant informed the Claimant on the xxth July 2019, and once again on the xxth April 2020 that there was no repeater signage present.  Therefore, by claiming (after being informed otherwise) that there were repeater signs in the area of the car park where vehicle XXXX XXX was parked, when in reality there was not, as shown by the Claimants own photographs, I believe that the Claimant is now deliberately attempting to mislead the court.  The Defendant can therefore only assume that the case bought by the Claimant is vexatious.  I would therefore ask that the Judge strike out the claim on this basis".

Brilliant news, well done

The question is ... do BWLegal actually know what they are doing, beng a robo-claimer involves little or no Intelligence ..... you have proved that

We will have to live with such incompetence until the new code of practice kicks in
I am certain with a fully independent appeals service that will follow, such rubbish will go into the shredder

Again, well done   

Umkomaas

There you go, success tinged with the disappointment of not being able to get this in front of a Judge who would have, hopefully, ripped the PPC a new one. 

I loved this phrase of yours in the post notifying us of your success.

What a bunch of time wasting cockroaches these people are!

Rosa_Klebb

beamerguy said:

Rosa_Klebb said:

So some great news all, I have SUCCESS! 

"The Defendant informed the Claimant on the xxth July 2019, and once again on the xxth April 2020 that there was no repeater signage present.  Therefore, by claiming (after being informed otherwise) that there were repeater signs in the area of the car park where vehicle XXXX XXX was parked, when in reality there was not, as shown by the Claimants own photographs, I believe that the Claimant is now deliberately attempting to mislead the court.  The Defendant can therefore only assume that the case bought by the Claimant is vexatious.  I would therefore ask that the Judge strike out the claim on this basis".

The question is ... do BWLegal actually know what they are doing, beng a robo-claimer involves little or no Intelligence ..... you have proved that

I'm not sure if it was a Robo Claim as such.  Sure the automated letters of course were and much of their Witness Statement was template stuff, but a good proportion of their Witness Statement was also personalized to my particular case quoting and referencing much of what I'd referred to in my defence.  Their paralegal had put a lot of time and work into it by the looks of it.  I was surprised how much effort they had gone to if I'm honest.  The document was nearly 1/2 an inch thick!  Perhaps they thought they were on to something?  Shame really!

Ironically they did point out that much of my Defence seemed to be a template downloaded from the internet.  Haha!

beamerguy

Rosa_Klebb said:

beamerguy said:

Rosa_Klebb said:

So some great news all, I have SUCCESS! 

"The Defendant informed the Claimant on the xxth July 2019, and once again on the xxth April 2020 that there was no repeater signage present.  Therefore, by claiming (after being informed otherwise) that there were repeater signs in the area of the car park where vehicle XXXX XXX was parked, when in reality there was not, as shown by the Claimants own photographs, I believe that the Claimant is now deliberately attempting to mislead the court.  The Defendant can therefore only assume that the case bought by the Claimant is vexatious.  I would therefore ask that the Judge strike out the claim on this basis".

The question is ... do BWLegal actually know what they are doing, beng a robo-claimer involves little or no Intelligence ..... you have proved that

I'm not sure if it was a Robo Claim as such.  Sure the automated letters of course were and much of their Witness Statement was template stuff, but a good proportion of their Witness Statement was also personalized to my particular case quoting and referencing much of what I'd referred to in my defence.  Their paralegal had put a lot of time and work into it by the looks of it.  I was surprised how much effort they had gone to if I'm honest.  Perhaps they thought they were on to something?  Shame really!

Ironically they did point out that much of my Defence seemed to be a template downloaded from the internet.  Haha!

A lot of what they do and say is copy and paste anyway, simply adapted to your case.

As far as their claim it was from the internet ???   They always include such nonsensical rubbish

Robo claimers fail to understand the facts ... that's what happened to you, your statement (poisoned chalice) was a wake up call which avoided another court spanking

Snakes_Belly

How do they expect a litigant in person to fight their corner without taking some advice from the Internet? It is after all a small claim.

Coupon-mad

Well done! 

Please don’t forget what I posted before, hopefully the Consultation will begin in August given the MHCLG said ‘Summer’:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/78411172/#Comment_78411172

Please, please come back every week to check and make sure your voice - AND YOUR FRIENDS’ AND RELATIVES’ VOICES TOO -  is/are not missed from this final opportunity to take part in the Government Consultation, coming very soon!

Rosa_Klebb

Thanks and will do Coupon Mad.

Rosa_Klebb

Snakes_Belly said:

How do they expect a litigant in person to fight their corner without taking some advice from the Internet? It is after all a small claim.

Exactly.  It is so mindlessly moronic and petty that they are prepared to talk all tough and take someone to court over a £100 parking disagreement.  That said when it comes to actually going to court, and when someone stands up to them, they bottle it!  What a pathetic bunch of Nancy's.

beamerguy

Rosa_Klebb said:

Snakes_Belly said:

How do they expect a litigant in person to fight their corner without taking some advice from the Internet? It is after all a small claim.

 moronic 

A lovely word that fits