IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including QR codes, number plates and reference numbers.
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Parking charge by UKPC for 'out of hours parking'. Chances of success on appeal

I have received a parking charge for parking during restricted hours - the charge is for parking for less than 15 minutes after 9pm.
I have read the NEWBIE page and technical issues relating to the same. However, I would like to know the impact on any appeal to UKPC and any subsequent appeal I may take forward to POPLA due to the circumstances of my issue.
The notice was given for a car I am the registered keeper of being present on a car park of a retail park (of which Wickes is the main retailer) during a restricted time. There are two or three other retailers there. (I have spoken to Wickes and have been told the car park is nothing to do with them). The notice was sent by post (taking 6 days to get to my house) and relates to a photograph of the car entering and exiting the car park. No windscreen notice was given. The time of the parking 'offence' was after 9PM and all shops were closed.
I have not replied to UKPC and have not given any details of the driver.

My issues are as follows
A) At the entrance to the car park there are several notices which state :-
1) This car park will be locked 30 minutes after the store closes and will reopen the following morning (details of an early opening charge for release of vehicles is also present on the sign) - The car park was open despite the shops being closed for several hours
2) The standard waiver of liability for loss and damage in the car park
3) A 'Maximum 3 hours stay only in the car park. For terms and conditions see signs in car park' This sign is on a tall car park floodlights as you enter the car park and the cameras are mounted on this floodlight. (There are other signs in the car park giving details of terms and conditions in the car park itself)

There are no signs at the entrance detailing a prohibited or restricted time after which there is a parking charge until you enter the car park. (The majority of these signs have no lights near them although some signs are on other other lighting poles). However, by the time you have entered the car park and are able to read the signs the photograph of the car number plate has already been taken and you cannot know the restriction until you are in the car park

B) The notices states that the car was present during the restricted time of between 08.30pm to 07.00am. However, the signs in the car park itself state the 'prohibited time' is between 20.00 and 07.00 - to two times do not accord.

I should add that I am aware my vehicle was there another evening around the same time for a similar period (around 10 minutes) but, obviously not since I receive the notice,

My questions are
Will either of the above points have any bearing on the relevance of any appeal?
At present the 'offer' I have is pay within 14 days and the penalty is £60 rather than £100. Should I appeal to UKCP and lose and then proceed to appeal to POPLA and lose what will the penalty be at that stage. Is it still the £100?
Many thanks in advance for any assistance.
«13

Comments

  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Photogenic
    edited 26 March 2021 at 6:57PM
    There is no Penalty , just an invoice !! I assume you mean UKPC ( not ukcp ), who never comply with POFA ? (Check the NTK PCN for POFA compliance )

    There is no chance of UKPC accepting any appeal , but do so as keeper using the blue text template from the newbies FAQ sticky thread near the top of the forum , after trying plan A ,  , but no blabbing about who was driving , not to anyone

    Your Popla appeal will start with POFA non compliance so no keeper liability

    The rest is extra padding , including no landowner authority and poor and inadequate signage etc , but probably will win on POFA and not get as far as your issues

    However , plan A is your best option , nothing beats plan A

    Anyone who loses at Popla has an implied debt of the full charge , typically £100 , not the discounted bribe of £60
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 41,919 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Photogenic
    If this is a multi-retailer site, there's usually a managing agent who's contracted with UKPC. Check the retail park signage at the entrance, that usually has the MA's name - maybe Jones Lang Lasalle - check it out. 
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • kelfish
    kelfish Posts: 28 Forumite
    First Post Combo Breaker First Anniversary
    Hi guys,
    Thanks for your swift responses. Just to be clear - by Plan A you mean writing to the owner of the land? 
    and the blue text template do you mean the 'one size fits all' first appeal? Is that all is required in the first instance appeal to UKPC?

  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Photogenic
    edited 26 March 2021 at 8:06PM
    Correct and correct , in that order ( owner , or more usually the managing agent or retailers )

    It's people who reveal who was driving to either party who tend to lose money in these cases , clever ones win on a technicality or a good story , so We visited.  We shopped etc , that royal WE gives nothing away
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 41,919 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Photogenic
    Tell us which retail park is involved. We may have records here relating to it. 
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • kelfish
    kelfish Posts: 28 Forumite
    First Post Combo Breaker First Anniversary
    Pinners Brow, Warrington
  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Photogenic
    edited 26 March 2021 at 10:37PM
    kelfish said:
    Pinners Brow, Warrington

    a quick google search shows agents and owner


    there is no parking allowed at the time the vehicle was there, so no contract to park, its forbidding signage, you cannot agree to a contract that forbids the act in the first place, ergo its a penalty or trespass against the driver only

    no parking contract , no consideration

    if UKPC failed to comply with POFA , there is no keeper liability anyway

    Pradera seem to be the owber, JLL are mentioned


  • KeithP
    KeithP Posts: 39,212 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Post First Anniversary
    Wickes helped this guy out when asked...

    CMS Parking Fine - Wickes Warrington


    But that was eight years ago.  :)

  • kelfish
    kelfish Posts: 28 Forumite
    First Post Combo Breaker First Anniversary
    Thanks. 
    Incredibly helpful.
    Sadly the time the vehicle was allegedly present in the car park the shop is detailed as being closed on Google. Wickes cannot confirm that whoever was driving was a customer.
    Sorry I am new to this. What exactly are UKPC are required to do to comply with POFA (Protection of Freedoms Act?) and what have they (or likely) failed to have done?
  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Photogenic
    edited 27 March 2021 at 12:29AM
    please read the newbies FAQ sticky thread, it deals with NTK checking and POFA compliance requirements (the law) - in post 1 you said you had read it, including the technical requirements (so we believed you , why wouldnt we ?)

    make sure you are well prepared for an hour or more to read , learn and understand POFA requirements

    what are they likely failed to have done ? failed on timescales, wording , or both
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 345.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 450.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 237.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 612.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 174.3K Life & Family
  • 250.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.