BW LEGAL offered without prejudice offer on PCN - help for next steps.

Castle

Umkomaas said:

The WS, apart from the first few paras, is not uploading. 

Of the 85 people of influence listed at Companies House, S Roche doesn't appear to be one of them!

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/01717239/officers?page=2

Not only that but "S Roche" has stated that "Car Park Management Services Ltd" shall be regarded as the creditor; the problem being that it's an entirely different company, (now dissolved).

nosferatu1001

Oh thats hilarious!
So there is no evidence of landowner agreement witht eh Claimant
They can point only to a witness statetement that alludes to there being an agreement, but thats with another company - not the claimant. On the balance of probabilities there is no agreement with the claimant. OP - you need to be REALLY clear on this., Claimnant is xxxx ltd, company number XYZ. Claimants WS claims they have a landholder agreement, trouble is that it is wth CPM Services Ltd, companies house number ABC, an entirely different company. 

kk1223

Castle said:

Not only that but "S Roche" has stated that "Car Park Management Services Ltd" shall be regarded as the creditor; the problem being that it's an entirely different company, (now dissolved).

What do you mean this company is dissolved? The Claimant is Car Park Management Services (CPMS) Ltd.  Do you mean that S. Roche because they have left the (CMPS) out it is different? 

nosferatu1001

Did you google the term? I would have thought it obvious
If something dissolves it is no longer there
A dissolvbed dcompany is dead. It is an ex company.
Of course it is different. CPMS (CPMS) Ltd is NOT THE SAME COMPANY as CPMS Ltd

kk1223

nosferatu1001 said:

Did you google the term? I would have thought it obvious
If something dissolves it is no longer there
A dissolvbed dcompany is dead. It is an ex company.
Of course it is different. CPMS (CPMS) Ltd is NOT THE SAME COMPANY as CPMS Ltd

Hi @no@nosferatu1001 - sorry yes I know what it means. I wasn't clear in my response -- I have done a check on Companies House and seen that they are two entirely different companies.  I will include that in my WS. Thanks for the comment.   

nosferatu1001

Alongside the different company numbers, not just the names. HAMMER that point home

Include an excerpt from CH showing the company is dissolved

DW190

kk1223 said:

Castle said:

Not only that but "S Roche" has stated that "Car Park Management Services Ltd" shall be regarded as the creditor; the problem being that it's an entirely different company, (now dissolved).

What do you mean this company is dissolved? The Claimant is Car Park Management Services (CPMS) Ltd.  Do you mean that S. Roche because they have left the (CMPS) out it is different? 

There you go.

nosferatu1001

We meant in your WS...!

kk1223

nosferatu1001 said:

We meant in your WS...!

Yes I know- I have now included this in my WS, I took a screen grab myself and appended it.  I didn't post it on here another helpful user did. 

nosferatu1001

Ah ok, sorry hadnt spotted! 
Make sure you ask the court to draw an obvious conclusion - they have exhibited a "WS" abouta dissolved company, because the claimant lacks any agreement, and they are hoping the court doesnt spot that the two companies are different.